Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
[url=http://cdn.macrumors.com/im/macrumorsthreadlogodarkd.png]Image[/url]


Exploring an observation initially made by iOS hacker @planetbeing, Shoutpedia notes that Apple has mysteriously begun censoring the word "jailbreak" in the U.S. iTunes Store. While not all mentions of the word are affected, the vast majority of them across all content types are currently being censored to "j*******k".

Image


Apple has long objected to the jailbreaking process, which opens up iOS devices for installation of apps from non-Apple approved sources and other system tweaks. But it is unclear what the company is trying to achieve with its iTunes Store censoring, which affects such content as Thin Lizzy's song and album of that name and an episode of the The Roy Rogers Show from the early 1950s.

Image


The censoring appears to only affect the U.S. iTunes Store at the present time, but it has been in effect for over eight hours now.

Article Link: Apple Censoring 'Jailbreak' in U.S. iTunes Store Listings

This is a sensationalist article, is entirely needless, and serves no end other than providing an avenue for even more needless forum banter.
 
Not Censorship

Apple has not "censored" anything. In the US, only congress is prohibited from censorship. What Apple has done is make a business decision. And is we do not like it, we can shop elsewhere.
 
This is a sensationalist article, is entirely needless, and serves no end other than providing an avenue for even more needless forum banter.

Yes,you are right. We should only have articles that can nurture our blind worship to Apple.
 
Ridiculous ^^

Still I guess it's mostly somebody updating a dictionary of forbidden words but still...

It's quite laughable, in general, that we hide words of vocabulary simply because they represents things that some close minded people wish we wouldn't speak about.
 
That's because at Apple, jailbreak is a dirty word :)
 
Last edited:
Apple has not "censored" anything. In the US, only congress is prohibited from censorship. What Apple has done is make a business decision. And is we do not like it, we can shop elsewhere.

I see nowhere in the definition of censorship that it applies only to government. Let's call a spade a spade...Apple's act of replacing letters in 'jailbreak' with asterisks is censorship. They are suppressing what they deem to be unacceptable.
 
Apple has not "censored" anything. In the US, only congress is prohibited from censorship. What Apple has done is make a business decision. And is we do not like it, we can shop elsewhere.
If only Congress was allowed to censor, then it would follow that what Apple is doing isn't censorship. However, I don't see how Congress being prohibited from censoring proves Apple isn't censoring things.

In any case, putting aside the broader civil rights issue of censorship, isn't the technique of beeping out spoken words or covering them with **** called censoring? Like songs released in censored and uncensored versions? So Apple adding **** to certain words they find provocative would be censoring.
 
This strikes me as a mistake. Like, someone was working on code to find the word hidden in app store descriptions and messed it all up somehow.

I dunno, that seems unbelievable, but so does "they did this on purpose." Not sure what's going on here.

I think so too.
 
How is this any different than the profanity filter on this site??!!

In my opinion any kind of filtering is hypocrisy!
 
Nothing to see here folks.

Just some graveyard shift junior-level iTunes Store content editor being a little sloppy with the banned words list editor.

I am unsurprised to see a legion of people here who have little understanding of the Bill Of Rights and what "freedom of speech" means related to constitutional law, something covered in a high school civics class.

Of course, underage MacRumors commenters are off the hook (and yes, there are lots) but any American adult here should know what the Bill of Rights' "freedom of speech" really means and who it refers to.
 
My guess is that they probably meant to limit this is APPS but inadvertently applied the censor to music as well. Now I'm wondering about movies and TV.

Tony

Tony is right.... This had to be intended for apps (even so, I can't imagine why) but is clearly a mistake for music and movies.
 
Apple has not "censored" anything. In the US, only congress is prohibited from censorship. What Apple has done is make a business decision. And is we do not like it, we can shop elsewhere.

Apple has not "censored" anything. [wrong]
In the US, only congress is prohibited from censorship. [wrong]
What Apple has done is make a business decision. [probably wrong]
And is we do not like it, we can shop elsewhere.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.