No one deserves that much pay. And don't say "whatever the market will bear" because that's just masturbation with money.
Yay missed the /s it seems“Only worth $1.5 billion.” This isn’t rich now?
You really believe that Tim Cook has managed to pull the wool over the eyes of a majority of people except for yours?It hit me this morning, if Tim Cook's Apple wasn't so afraid of third-party Science & Technology, 1/3 of the General Public here in the States might NOT be as well !
To my knowledge, Tim Cook's Apple has NEVER ONCE recommended OR promoted ANY App in their "curated" iOS App Store that represented a Significant Engineering Accomplishment !
Cook may have fooled his Board & most so-called Pro Stock Analysts, but (probably) few who have paid close attention the past 4-5 years.
I give the guy a D- grade.
He could have done so much more than just prop-up the company's stock !
Why should it be? He's not getting free money. He's getting compensated for how much he produces for the company he works for. Just like an investor gets revenue based on the performance of the stock he invested in.It isn't well deserved, it's outrageous, just like most CEO pay is. The fact that some thing this is OK is pretty sickening
For a guy who comes from a very ordinary family and who has not founded and built up his own company, this fortune is quite extraordinary.“Only worth $1.5 billion.” This isn’t rich now?
You really believe that Tim Cook has managed to pull the wool over the eyes of a majority of people except for yours?
I think that is the sign of a sincere CEO. I used to work for a major...(fortune 100) finance corporation, the CEO at the time only took a salary of $1m. The rest of his income was to be based on stock values...if the stock and company did well. he made more. If it did worse, he made less. Tim has brought Apple to be one of the highest (if not the highest) valued corporations.I agree but I still think he is underpaid. Should earn more.
I agree with you. It pretty much comes to a love and hate-type relationship. In this world... you can't make everyone happy.I think that is the sign of a sincere CEO. I used to work for a major...(fortune 100) finance corporation, the CEO at the time only took a salary of $1m. The rest of his income was to be based on stock values...if the stock and company did well. he made more. If it did worse, he made less. Tim has brought Apple to be one of the highest (if not the highest) valued corporations.
Face it, honestly not everybody likes Apple, but they don't have to and if they don't there are other choices...as with every other product and service in life. Don't like one brand of car? pick a different one. Don't like one brand of coffee? pick a different one. Buy/use what makes you happy. No one company is EVER going to please ALL it's customers.
Or he doesn't have any expenses at all?I'm sure his expenses are high.
Good for Elon! deserved.
Worth every cent , if anything he’s underpaid
That is completely true. As the CEO, you want to oversee a company that produces/creates good product that your customers want, but also maintain the company at the expected level that the shareholders and board of directors...if not, you will be removed pretty quickly.Whilst even I pause when I read numbers like this, at the end of the day, the remuneration packages at this level isn't so much for what work/effort you did, but rather the outcomes/results you produced. Given most of the remuneration is in the form of long term incentives/equities which vest over time, his role as CEO is in alignment with the interests of shareholders who at the end of the day, are the ones paying for him. If he wasn't producing results in line with what shareholders wanted, particularly the institutional/proxy houses, they'd vote him out or against the remuneration packages pretty quickly. The other flip side is that this equity awards may not even vest for any number of reasons, or if they do, they may end up being worth a lot less than what was initially disclosed due to the way share based payments work and are accounted for... thus introducing some degree of risk for the executive, and alignment of principal/agency.
This is coming from someone who used to work in the field of accounting for/reporting executive compensation. I'm not saying I necessarily agree with the reasonableness of the amount, but I acknowledge that comparing CEO remuneration packages which is based on shareholders willing to pay for it and expecting a result vs. an employee who is compensated for their time, is always going to appear excessively imbalanced.
Last I checked, this country was a capitalist country and always has been...going back to the beginning days. Vanderbilts, Rockefellers, etc....and if you start complaining about capitalists, you will be labeled as "socialist"Capitalism at its finest. Good work, Tim.
Anyone want to do the math on how much more Zuk gets compared to Meta...musil🤣 employees ? or how much the pharma CEO's get paid compared to their employees?Anyone want to do the math on how much more he gets compared to the median income provided by Apple?
Probably more than is announced....giving to charity should be anonymous, otherwise it's showing off. Also people that need to receive the charity should not be made to feel bad as they might have just fallen on a bad situation.I always look up to people who achieve this success but must admit reading this is quite sickening when you think about all the people struggling out there.
I wonder what he does for charity?
Bobby Flay reportedly makes nearly $2 million every year. Vanity Fair reported that the Emmy-award-winning chef can earn upwards $100,000 for a single appearance on a show.I agree that, in general, CEO compensation in the US is crazy. However, there are tons of examples of whacky compensation. There are people on Wall Street that make insane amounts of money doing nothing more than trading other peoples money, and often doing worse than the broader indices. There are athletes that make crazy $$. The highest paid California employees are college football coaches. The list goes on and on.
At least Apple makes an actual product, and that's something.
Because he falls into the same tax rate chart as does every person in the country.He must lose half that sum in tax I would think. If not, why not?
Well we know how much Elon Musk is going to be paying for taxesBecause he falls into the same tax rate chart as does every person in the country.