It's not the matter of "how hard one works", it's the level of responsibility he is being compensated for. But I agree, if this practice is sickening than what some sports figures and entertainers get paid and are worth could also be considered sickening.
Yes, those inequities of pay are
also sickening.
As for level of responsibility, I would argue that executives don’t face anything near the same level of potential consequences for their so-called level of responsibility.
If an upper management exec or CEO screws up, they usually blow it off as “market forces”, pass the blame to an underling, or, at worst, get asked to step down by the board, often getting a golden parachute to further cushion their soaring off on a lateral career change to a similar-income job.
Or they can retire, zero harm done to their ability to pay bills, own multiple homes & luxury cars, care for family, etc. They literally face zero risk and therefore zero consequences for their so-called “great responsibility”. There’s nothing at stake.
Look what happened to actual executives Apple (and other companies) pushed out over PR embarrassments. They’re still better off than the rest of us.
An Apple Store employee, a UI designer, copywriter, IT department/helpdesk, etc. employee... they have a
lot more to lose (sometimes everything) if someone decides they’ve messed up and fire them for it (or just decide their position is no longer “necessary”, and eliminate their job to further the profit margins at the top).
Non-executive workers face serious consequences. Their whole lives are at stake. They’re far more likely to be at risk of being unable to pay utilities bills, mortgages, taxes, insurance, healthcare, vehicle maintenance, childcare, groceries, etc.
With great responsibility should also come great potential consequences for actions, but consequences seem to be one of the things the executive class are immune to via their vast wealth.