Can’t wait for the keynote. Pissing myself laughing at various highly-paid executives stumbling about wearing skiing goggles will certainly enrich my life!
This is brilliant.If it can pull off holographic projected FaceTime conversations I’ll buy it instantly.
They'll reveal these while playing this in the backgroundCan’t wait for the keynote. Pissing myself laughing at various highly-paid executives stumbling about wearing skiing goggles will certainly enrich my life!
This is definitely going to happen. It’s only a matter of time. Remember the members of the The Jedi High Council? This is the one feature I’m looking forward to the most.This is brilliant.
Can you imagine seeing somebody in some form of 3-D dimension? Ultimately, I do think this is where it will lead, is specific features like this. Loads of potential here.
Smartphones and tablets have pretty much plateaued, improvements are only incremental at this point. Tech companies are desperate for the next big thing to grab consumers' attention (and $$$). VR/AR is not it imo but who knows what will happen in a few years time.I hate all of these tech companies trying to ram VR down our throats like it’s something we actually need lol.
Definitely. Same thing happened circa 2014 prior to the Watch unveiling. “The wrist is an area of great interest to us”This language shift is definitely not accidental, and it probably means that an announcement or preview isn't too far off.
At an estimated $3,000 a pair the number of buyers is limited. Very limited.despite reading all of the articles and rumors on this thing, I have NO idea what to expect in real world use lol. I am very excited though.
I think this is going to be really cool and compelling… whenever they decide to reveal it.
That $3,000 figure is a deliberately planted red herring.At an estimated $3,000 a pair the number of buyers is limited. Very limited.
As someone who is about to get an iPhone 13 pro max I hope its not worse than my 11 pro (which is pretty good IMO)The LiDAR sensor often gets in the way of taking acceptable photos. If the intended subject is behind a window (such as through a car or plane window), the phone frequently gets totally confused about where to focus and seemingly tries to focus on the glass. Many photos have been missed due to this.
That’s why I don’t care about hardware. Just the 1TB on my 13, that’s all I care about.I've been very under whelmed by having LiDAR on my iPhone. I've tried Apps supporting it and they're ok but nothing that makes me feel that the LiDAR is a must have feature. I wouldn't miss it if it was dropped. What percentage of iPhone owners would?
Tim's comment:
makes me think that we're paying for hardware on our iPhones to allow Apple to nurture an early AR App eco-system.
$7999 for 1TB iSeeTheFuture$2500 for 32GB iSee.
$3500 for 128GB iSee More.
$4500 for 256GB iSee Usable.
If the rumours are true, especially the MacBook Pro level computational power then it can’t cost less than 2k base MBP 14. 2.5k seems like the minimum possible price and 3k looks good. Think of it as a MacBook with 2-3 high quality screens, plus some extra VR specific features. For 3k it’s an amazing value proposition. People buy MBP 16 just because that want a big screen. I see no reason why people won’t buy those glasses just because they want multiple good screens.That $3,000 figure is a deliberately planted red herring.
Just as when the original iPad was rumored to come in at $800 or $1,000 or whatever the figure it was — and instead dropped in our laps at $500.
The Apple AR/VR set will start at, say, $1,500 and everyone will be so amazed at how “inexpensive” it is, they'll rush to buy it! Yet, unlike the iPad, they won't find it a magical device with amazingly diverse uses…
But cognitive dissonance will set in and they'll hype their purchase, anyway, talking about how fantastic, incredible,,and “innovative” it is!
The hardware may definitely be on MBP level but I guess most consumers see AR/VR headsets as a novelty/gimmick. On the other hand, you can do real work (and make money) on a MBP here and now. It's not only the hardware, it's what you can do with it that justifies the price tag.If the rumours are true, especially the MacBook Pro level computational power then it can’t cost less than 2k base MBP 14. 2.5k seems like the minimum possible price and 3k looks good. Think of it as a MacBook with 2-3 high quality screens, plus some extra VR specific features. For 3k it’s an amazing value proposition. People buy MBP 16 just because that want a big screen. I see no reason why people won’t buy those glasses just because they want multiple good screens.
Unless of course apple will do something stupid, like not permitting to run mac apps on it. Then I agree, 3k is a hard sell.
All the trusted and reliable sources/leakers suggest Apple is working on a headset and glasses. They all come to the same conclusion - "We don't know what it can do but we do know it's going to be colossally expensive". They priced the headset at around $3000. I'd be surprised if its any less than 2K.