I kind of agree, but at this point one has to look around at how our government is spending the money that it does get and think perhaps it's not the worst thing in the world for Apple to sit on that cash after all.
That's not how taxes work!
I kind of agree, but at this point one has to look around at how our government is spending the money that it does get and think perhaps it's not the worst thing in the world for Apple to sit on that cash after all.
Cheating is cheating, it's intent. You can legally cheat in sport....still cheating. Cheating is not about legal or illegal. You can cheat on your partner.....legally you are fine....is when people defend cheats, that says a lot.... look at historic sporting events plenty of examples of blatant cheating that the laws allowed and cheaters exposed....
Pure greed is when you publically support and preach social and moral issues and yet your company avoids taxes that would help fund those initiatives. Usually something the rich talk about to make themselves feel better about each other and yet pay less % in taxes than everyone else cause they have access to lawyers so find loopholes for them, and the concept of paying thier share is so foreign to them.
Feel free to have a conversation with someone on average salary about the loopholes they use.....they will give you blank looks, as the vast majority of the population complies to paying thier taxes with the intent of the law.
I was shocked that there wasn't an emoji in sight! I was surprised (for the first time in many years) to see them going back to discreet graphics cards. It's a step in the right direction, hopefully whatever replaces the Mac Pro won't be a pile of fail. I can't see the iMac Pro changing the minds of pros all by itself. We don't like all in ones. I also think they missed the point a bit. They seemed to be focusing on extreme power....which isn't really all the pros want. A top end i7, GTX 1080ti, 64/128GB RAM, and fast storage would be a nice entry level pro Mac for like the $1,899-$2499 range. $5k+ misses the mark. Tim just doesn't understand his customers....that's what it all comes down to. Steve understood the pro market a lot better. Most graphics houses aren't going to shell out $5k for a single desktop. It's nuts.What did you think of the Keynote on Monday? Was it disappointing as you thought it would be with all the new hardware and iOS 11?
[doublepost=1497126868][/doublepost]Yikes! This guy is leading Apple? Sounds more like a campaign speech. Poor Apple :<
Apple CEO Tim Cook today delivered the 2017 commencement address at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
![]()
Cook first reflected on his inability to figure out what the purpose of his life is, while poking fun at Windows PCs in the process. For context, Cook briefly worked at former PC maker Compaq in early 1998 prior to joining Apple.Cook's search eventually led him to Apple in 1998, when the company was flirting with bankruptcy and struggling to survive.
Tim Cook appears around 7:00 mark
Working with Apple co-founder Steve Jobs, Cook said he eventually learned "life's biggest and most important question" being "how can I serve humanity?"Cook concluded his speech by saying he's "optimistic" in the next generation's own journey to serve humanity.Cook toured the MIT campus on Thursday. "So impressed by MIT students and faculty who are finding new ways to tackle the world's biggest challenges," he tweeted. "Thanks for sharing your work!"
Article Link: Apple CEO Tim Cook Pokes Fun at Windows PCs in Commencement Address at MIT
Oh give me a break. You clearly have no understanding of the financial realities around manufacturing these products. Does anyone make their computers or smart phones or other gadgets here in the US? No. But somehow Apple is the only bad guy? People gripe about current iPhone prices. What do you think a US-made iPhone would cost? Are you willing to put your money where your mouth is and actually pay 3x, 4x, 5x more for that product? Of course you're not. You'd rather just complain and making thinly veiling homophobic remarks on a forum.
Not again. Sigh. How many times do I have to post on this forum that I was making the usual disgruntled taxpayer poke at the government? It's not meant to be taken seriously as a dissertation on taxation and economics. Doesn't anyone read through a thread anymore? It was a snark.That's not how taxes work!
Microsoft is coming for you Apple - and you're to blind to see it.
Everybody's frustrated with Apple.
Timmy needs to get fired.
I'm not frustrated. I don't know any owners of Apple products that are frustrated.
Devastating to watch Mac sales plummet. We need real innovation like 30-day battery life, Blu-ray, 8K display, 5 TB drive, all in a light and thin aluminum body for only $600.
The iMac Pro should be $1,000 AT MOST. I can build a PC with the same specs for less than the crazy $5,000 they are asking for. HomePod should be $50.
Until then I am voting with my wallet and proudly giving my money to real innovative artists like Samsung and Asus. They DESTROY everything Apple makes.
Seek the company of people with higher standards.
I was shocked that there wasn't an emoji in sight! I was surprised (for the first time in many years) to see them going back to discreet graphics cards. It's a step in the right direction, hopefully whatever replaces the Mac Pro won't be a pile of fail. I can't see the iMac Pro changing the minds of pros all by itself. We don't like all in ones. I also think they missed the point a bit. They seemed to be focusing on extreme power....which isn't really all the pros want. A top end i7, GTX 1080ti, 64/128GB RAM, and fast storage would be a nice entry level pro Mac for like the $1,899-$2499 range. $5k+ misses the mark. Tim just doesn't understand his customers....that's what it all comes down to. Steve understood the pro market a lot better. Most graphics houses aren't going to shell out $5k for a single desktop. It's nuts.
To answer your question....it was not as disappointing as I expected....but I think I enjoyed it more thinking it would just be an emoji festival and seeing some good change. Though I not yet convinced of Apples recommitment to the pros.
Now that there is funny. Thanks for the laugh.
[doublepost=1497129968][/doublepost]
I'm not frustrated. I don't know any owners of Apple products that are frustrated. The only place I see this so called frustration is on these negative "tech" web sites.
Apple makes great products that millions of people enjoy using - they consistently get the best marks in consumer satisfaction and customer service.
I enjoy all of my Apple products and have made a little money as an Apple stockholder. Timmy is not going to get fired for leading the company into more financial success year after year.
Don't believe everything you read. "everybody's....." is almost always wrong.
Not sure about greed but you've definitely defined hypocrisy. But you're never a hypocrite, right?
Not again. Sigh. How many times do I have to post on this forum that I was making the usual disgruntled taxpayer poke at the government? It's not meant to be taken seriously as a dissertation on taxation and economics. Doesn't anyone read through a thread anymore? It was a snark.
It's funny how the iPad only gets more useful the more they make it like a Mac. It's good they finally realized that a giant iPhone isn't good enough to get real work done.I was was actually shocked how Much hardware was announced. I didn't see that coming. I think the iPads were the main focus with iOS 11. The specifications were fairly impressive as well.
I liked the iMac Pro. I think it will offer a separation for those who need the extra power and the space gray looks sharp. I look forward to seeing what the Mac Pro will offer in the future.
Overall, I thought it was decent keynote. The amount of hardware announced was somewhere around $34,000 with the upgrades and specifications.
I think it will be interesting to see where Apple leads in the Pro category. I do think it's important to remember that core demographic as you mentioned and they have a place for their work needs as well.
Clearly you haven't touched a Windows machine OR a Samsung phone, and certainly not anytime recently if likely ever. You take all those. Good for you.Not even close. Your "PC" would be running Windoze which is a nightmare, and Samsung phones are STILL horribly laggy in 2017. I'll take my Mac, iPhone, iPad, and Apple Watch that all run like the wind and all work together without headaches.
Not even close. Your "PC" would be running Windoze which is a nightmare, and Samsung phones are STILL horribly laggy in 2017. I'll take my Mac, iPhone, iPad, and Apple Watch that all run like the wind and all work together without headaches.
Not even close. Your "PC" would be running Windoze which is a nightmare, and Samsung phones are STILL horribly laggy in 2017. I'll take my Mac, iPhone, iPad, and Apple Watch that all run like the wind and all work together without headaches.
Forbes? Ha. That has-been magazine hates Apple. Anyone objective knows that. They've never published a pro-Apple article. If there's a negative point of view to be had, you can rest assured those D list journalists will find it.
Ballmerization?
Did Microsoft produce a whole new programming language like Swift under Ballmer?
Did Microsoft develop a custom SoC architecture under Ballmer?
Did Microsoft develop its own custom processors under Ballmer?
Did Microsoft launch a world-wide mobile payment system under Ballmer?
Did Microsoft pay out over $70B to developers under Ballmer?
Give me a break.
[doublepost=1497071189][/doublepost]
Haters gonna hate. Small minded people with little lives whose daily highlight is crying about Apple's supposed lack of innovation on a tech forum. Wah! Wah! Wah!
Anyone who isn't completely blind knows that Apple has been extremely innovative under Cook. They've done some great work on custom chips, battery tech, and power management. They've produced an entirely new programming language. They've launched the most successful wearable to date. Every one of their corporate acquisitions has paid off, unlike the Nokia deal as you pointed out. Cook isn't a visionary but he's doing a great job leading the company.
So you're Apple's Nick Burns!Forbes? Ha. That has-been magazine hates Apple. Anyone objective knows that. They've never published a pro-Apple article. If there's a negative point of view to be had, you can rest assured those D list journalists will find it.
Ballmerization?
Did Microsoft produce a whole new programming language like Swift under Ballmer?
Did Microsoft develop a custom SoC architecture under Ballmer?
Did Microsoft develop its own custom processors under Ballmer?
Did Microsoft launch a world-wide mobile payment system under Ballmer?
Did Microsoft pay out over $70B to developers under Ballmer?
Give me a break.
[doublepost=1497071189][/doublepost]
Haters gonna hate. Small minded people with little lives whose daily highlight is crying about Apple's supposed lack of innovation on a tech forum. Wah! Wah! Wah!
Anyone who isn't completely blind knows that Apple has been extremely innovative under Cook. They've done some great work on custom chips, battery tech, and power management. They've produced an entirely new programming language. They've launched the most successful wearable to date. Every one of their corporate acquisitions has paid off, unlike the Nokia deal as you pointed out. Cook isn't a visionary but he's doing a great job leading the company.