OK, and your point is? Tim Cook was choosen by Steve try to remember that.
Senator, You are no Jack Kennedy
OK, and your point is? Tim Cook was choosen by Steve try to remember that.
I wonder what he would make of the way Apple is run today and how Apple constantly fails to innovate year after year?
This "rememberence" of the day Steve died is so wrong. If they wanted to pay proper tribute, celebrate his birthday. He should be remembered for how he lived, not how he died.
The next person who thinks of excusing Cook's dismantling of a once proud company on the grounds that "Steve was unique" needs to keep such thoughts to themselves. When you voluntarily take over the reigns of a company like Apple, you have an obligation to continue its tradition of excellence. Appeasing Carl Ichan and watch band enthusiasts alone doesn't cut it. The Apple looks polished on the outside for now, but it's rotting at the core.
There are others who are capable of following in Steve's footsteps. Apple would honor him best by replacing Cook with such an individual.
Actually I'd love to know what he would have thought of the decision to abandon Apple's previous loyal base of creative professionals. He wasn't one to keep products around if they were unsuccessful and he wasn't a very sentimental guy, but would he have wanted to keep the halo effect of being the choice of creative professionals?
I don't know.
I'm in two minds about this. I can appreciate why people are concerned about Mac hardware updates.
But abandoning Apple's creative pros? While dropping Aperture was regrettable, Logic Pro X is hands-down the best DAW on the market; and as it happens, cheaper than almost all of them. FCPX had a rocky start, but it's really improved.
That slip away from professionals started under his reign, so, I don't think he would care much. Watch many of his old keynotes, he was more into bringing high end technology to the masses, something they still do today, despite the cloud of negativity that surrounds Apple these days.Obviously he would take one look at things and say "This is ****!"
Actually I'd love to know what he would have thought of the decision to abandon Apple's previous loyal base of creative professionals. He wasn't one to keep products around if they were unsuccessful and he wasn't a very sentimental guy, but would he have wanted to keep the halo effect of being the choice of creative professionals?
I don't know.
The retina MacBook Pro and new iMacs run them just fine actually. You just have to order the higher spec models with i7 and faster graphics to make them work their best. This is just like you had to do back in the days of the G4, G5, etc.But Apple don't offer any decent hardware to run those apps on.
THIS I genuinely do miss. However, people are crazy to think that Apple would be that much different if he were alive today. Mistakes were made while Steve was alive and they're still being made today.
Tim Cook doesn't have the same energy/charisma as Steve and that's why it's his stage presence that I miss most.
For so long, people accused Apple users of caring more about aesthetics than real computer power. Now that Apple have an in-house chip with double the single-core performance of the competitor, people start moaning about things like bezels.
But hey, I guess 'innovate' means different things to different people.
yep.He would have fired everyone running Apple if he saw the **** they we're doing.
But Apple don't offer any decent hardware to run those apps on.
I wonder what he would make of the way Apple is run today and how Apple constantly fails to innovate year after year?
Do you remember the iPhone 4?iOS wouldn't be a laggy mess on a brand new iPhone in 2016 if Steve were still around. I miss his presentations too but his absence at Apple is obviously notable with the dip in quality over the past few years. I cannot remember anyone being so complacent with their devices like we are today when he was at the helm.
Yes, Steve had his faults and he laid some eggs as well, but I think overall, his vision, and ability to push people to do extraordinary things is unmatched. True that often resulted in people in getting burnt out, but I think it created many great products.Do you remember the iPhone 4?
Sorry, but no, not everything was perfect under his reign either. People also have a real short term memory when it comes to Apple overall.
Do you remember the iPhone 4?
Sorry, but no, not everything was perfect under his reign either. People also have a real short term memory when it comes to Apple overall.
I couldn't agree more.Yes, Steve had his faults and he laid some eggs as well, but I think overall, his vision, and ability to push people to do extraordinary things is unmatched. True that often resulted in people in getting burnt out, but I think it created many great products.
Actually no I am not.I remember the 4 vividly, yes, as it was my first iPhone and what made me fall in love with Apple. I know you're referring to the whole "antennagate" issue though, which I didn't find an issue at all and found it to be overblown. But you're talking about a specific hardware flaw (which was later mostly fixed by software), not how original and great the device itself was.
You're right. We should also do away with President's Day, Memorial Day, MLK Day and any mention of people who have changed the world, but have died. No sense in paying homage to people who are no longer alive.
Eeeeeehhh... there's a bit of a storm around here about Apple not updating their Macs. But in the portables at least, the newer Intel quad-core i7s aren't really that great. In fact, even the new mobile Xeons have less grunt than the current gen sitting in the 15" rMBPs. So we'd be just as unhappy if Apple released new MacBook Pros with a lower benchmark than the previous gen.
Plus if Apple were to update them, at best we'd be looking at 5% more CPU power, while impacting Apple's cost as a result. Not to defend or make excuses for them, but it's not all that bad.
The Mac Pro? Well crumbs, Apple need to get their cheeks together about that. Should have a Xeon E5-2679 sitting in that.
The retina MacBook Pro and new iMacs run them just fine actually. You just have to order the higher spec models with i7 and faster graphics to make them work their best. This is just like you had to do back in the days of the G4, G5, etc.