Super religous people should not open public businesses. Become a priest or something.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple CEO Tim Cook Speaks Out Against Indiana's 'Religious Freedom' Law
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Super religous people should not open public businesses. Become a priest or something.
What are these external factors? Shock treatment? If you don't want your very limited words on this to be twisted, tell us more about what you believe. External factors ffs. Alien abduction? Ignorance can only get you so far.
The Nazis saw themselves as Aryan (first race), but I used the term to define the Germanic Race, which included both light and dark hair in its various tribes.
Until they all die out. Not my idea of evolutionary success.
Unhealthy childhood relationships with females for one, sexual abuse amongst other things.
I wouldn't say that but it clearly shows sexual behaviour is influenced by genes.
Yeah, that's true, when I see another woman's exterior, I have the tendency to admire it, and in some cases become sexually aroused. Like every other lesbian, bi/pan woman.
The external factor being that women are sexy to us.
If you are referring to our evolving into hermaphrodites, that's not the same thing as being non-productive.
Congrats you have now become the same as those who came up with that silly law.
Intolerant.
----------
Way to be tolerant of others. Good job!
When i see two sexy slutty pumpkins kissing ... well you get the idea
The only thing I'm thinking is how to join in 
The 'establishment clause' does not allow for the passing of any law that recognizes a religion. ANY religion.
The Establishment Clause is a limitation placed upon the United States Congress preventing it from passing legislation respecting an establishment of religion. The second half of the Establishment Clause inherently prohibits the government from preferring any one religion over another; which tends to allow for a greater harmony amongst all of the many denominations in the United States. While the Establishment Clause does prohibit Congress from preferring or elevating one religion over another, still it does not prohibit the government's entry into religious domain to make accommodations for religious observances and practices in order to achieve the purposes of the Free Exercise Clause.
Since many religions DO support gay marriage, and have no issues with gays, the State if Indiana directly supported a religion by passing this law therefore violating the establishment clause.
Either way, the State on Indiana just did what Sharia Law would have done. They have segregated a portion of our current society for the removal of their rights. There is nothing constitutional about that.
Listen, I'm not a fan of gays, or gay sex, but since I am not the former, and don't engage in the later, I really don't have a say in it.
Marriage is a merger, a 'legal construct', the legal joining of two lives, for legal benefit to each person in said merger.
I've known many gay couples that have been together for tens of years, and put many of the heterosexual marriages to shame. When we get into deciding if someone loves another person well enough to merit the award of marriage, many heterosexual marriages would be nullified.
Heck, Newt Gingrich is on his, what, third wife, maybe forth? Rush Limbaugh is on his fourth, and was arrested for attempting to smuggle hundreds of Viagra tablets to a country known for their marketing of young boy to rich men for sex.
So, try to say that gay marriage devalues 'traditional marriage'. You don't have a damn solid leg to stand on.
And 'traditional marriage' isn't even the same as it was in those much lusted after 'biblical times'. It's been redefined many times.
Indiana, and potentially Alabama, are departing on a dangerous course. Incorporating hatred, intolerance, and bigotry, is no way to run a state, or a country. Well, unless you want to install Sharia Law in the United States.
Because if nothing else I say sinks in, think about what could be next.
Making smoking illegal? Drinking? (Oh, they can think of doing that again, especially if hatred and bigotry are installing in state laws and constitutions) Extramarital sex? Sex toys? Walking with anyone not related, or married to a woman?
Sound familiar?
Be careful...
And in a family of 6 kids that I mentioned before where these is no favourite child or no sexual abuse, how could there be a gay child? You wanted to see acceptable analysis that homosexuality is not genetics but offer very little to prove your own argument. You've pretty much said that anything could be the reason, but not genetics. You're not a real doctor, are you?
Aryan people are from the India and Iran nothing like what germans looked like.
As for the Gay people on a island with lesbians they would do just fine. I'm sure they would find a way to get pregnant because gay people do adopt children. They would probably be more successful than a bunch of christians trapped on an Ilsand
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/12/why-are-there-gay-men_n_1590501.html
I didn't say our future is going to be non-productive. I'm saying that evolution doesn't say it has our back. What happens happens. If we develop what we need to survive or we die off because of not being able to survive in environment, it's evolutions call. We don't have a backroom deal with it.
You mean, of course, hypocritical intervention.
Yes, evolution will decide. Either removal of the cause, or hermaphrodites will be the new species. But that is then, this is now - with all its perversion.
Maybe it's something else..... ooh the suspense. Maybe it was the aliens afterall.
Good reason as any since we have no real proof of it either just like any religion you can think of.
I mean a man not having to put his penis into a woman for a baby to be born. If 90% of babies are born gay in the future, it might mean a trip to the shops to get a bottle of some dudes finest so that another gay, healthy and active member of society can be born. It might even be a better way to go, but that's for another discussion.
Its not genetic. There is no hard proof to date. I know all gays want this as its holy grail from them. Sorry.
You're prepared to accept alien abduction over genetics. Is your name Karl Pilkington?
Practically every relationship I've had with a woman has been unhealthy. They are always after our essence...
And I'm a man.
Sex is only dirty if you are doing it right...
Group Capt. Lionel Mandrake: Uh, Jack, Jack, listen... tell me, tell me, Jack. When did you first... become... well, develop this theory?
General Jack D. Ripper: [somewhat embarassed] Well, I, uh... I... I... first became aware of it, Mandrake, during the physical act of love.
Group Capt. Lionel Mandrake: Hmm.
General Jack D. Ripper: Yes, a uh, a profound sense of fatigue... a feeling of emptiness followed. Luckily I... I was able to interpret these feelings correctly. Loss of essence.
Group Capt. Lionel Mandrake: Hmm.
General Jack D. Ripper: I can assure you it has not recurred, Mandrake. Women uh... women sense my power and they seek the life essence. I, uh... I do not avoid women, Mandrake.
General Jack D. Ripper: [somewhat embarassed] Well, I, uh... I... I... first became aware of it, Mandrake, during the physical act of love.
Group Capt. Lionel Mandrake: Hmm.
General Jack D. Ripper: Yes, a uh, a profound sense of fatigue... a feeling of emptiness followed. Luckily I... I was able to interpret these feelings correctly. Loss of essence.
Group Capt. Lionel Mandrake: Hmm.
General Jack D. Ripper: I can assure you it has not recurred, Mandrake. Women uh... women sense my power and they seek the life essence. I, uh... I do not avoid women, Mandrake.