Apple is all for removing features, ports and making everything more slim and reduced battery run time. Their REAL political views are probably the same.
Which sound like Apple has been true to Steve Job's vision all along.Apple is all for removing features, ports and making everything more slim and reduced battery run time. Their REAL political views are probably the same.
As for diversity, Apple "has a lot of different people from a lot of different places" and is "accepting of people everywhere" which has led Cook to believe that the company has something unique to offer in conversations about diversity, which is also tied to the company's views on human rights and one of the reasons why Cook spoke out on recent U.S. immigration policy that saw children separated from their parents, which he called "inhumane." "Ultimately, that is what human rights are, treating people with dignity and respect," he told Lashinsky.
While Apple is quick to speak out on policies surrounding immigration, diversity, human rights, and similar topics, Cook clarified that Apple does not "get into politics."
They absolutely have the right to donate, support and speak out for any cause that suits them. AS PRIVATE CITIZENS.
IMO, one underlying issue we have in the US is that people with money - corporate exec's, actors, athletes, etc. - have a platform to share their opinions and beliefs that is beyond the common person, and this is a great example of that.
And that those of certain races/ethnicities/religions/genders should have rights superior to those of other races/ethnicities/religions/genders.
These CEO's think the USA can keep bringing in a million LEGAL immigrants a year, and a million ILLEGAL immigrants a year, while also bringing in hundred of thousands of "REFUGEES" a year, most of which take huge amounts of government assistance and are mostly low wage workers, while still selling their 1000 dollar hardware...
These CEO's absolutely don't care about the country, once this country is ruined, they will just go to another country and sell their product. But rude awakening CHINA WILL NOT SELL NON-CHINESE PRODUCT! So if that's their master plan, good luck.
[doublepost=1529985033][/doublepost]
I'm not saying this in a sarcastic manner, but do you really think Tim Cook lives in a "diverse" neighborhood?
These CEO's think the USA can keep bringing in a million LEGAL immigrants a year, and a million ILLEGAL immigrants a year, while also bringing in hundred of thousands of "REFUGEES" a year, most of which take huge amounts of government assistance and are mostly low wage workers, while still selling their 1000 dollar hardware...
These CEO's absolutely don't care about the country, once this country is ruined, they will just go to another country and sell their product. But rude awakening CHINA WILL NOT SELL NON-CHINESE PRODUCT! So if that's their master plan, good luck.
[doublepost=1529985033][/doublepost]
I'm not saying this in a sarcastic manner, but do you really think Tim Cook lives in a "diverse" neighborhood?
Strong CEO there. I applaud him for speaking up on these issues.
It's certainly wearing on me these interviews. So many now about the same thing. It's fine, what he's standing for is fine, nothing against the message, I just want the CEO of a tech company to talk a little bit more about technology.
The line is often nonexistent when the average person sees the leader of a company donate to a candidate. They automatically assume the company’s position is that of the CEO’s.They're private citizens. Why shouldn't they.
Tim’s political views don’t really hold much weight with me.
The line is often nonexistent when the average person sees the leader of a company donate to a candidate. They automatically assume the company’s position is that of the CEO’s.
That makes him a strong CEO? Seriously? What about business acumen? Does that not matter anymore? Taking a stance on social issues is more important than properly running your business? He really needs to mind the store. Cook credibility is dwindling.
They're private citizens. Why shouldn't they.
No one is saying they can't donate as private citizens. The point being made is that when those private citizens are the top decision makers at a company, saying the company doesn't donate is only technically correct.
So do employees from every other company in the country. So what? That doesn't mean the company itself is in the middle of it.
[doublepost=1529981947][/doublepost]
He's playing the middle ground, which is exactly what needs to happen in his role.
[doublepost=1529982025][/doublepost]
As someone who's been on these boards since 2014, certainly you know the answer to that because Apple has given you a timeframe multiple times now, and it's not this month. It's been discussed in forums and articles on this very site. Do you want an unfinished product? Or one that's rushed to market? Or do you want them to move the schedule forward even though you've been informed for the last year that it's targeted for 2019?
And that statement carries even less weight with everyone else here.
[doublepost=1529988772][/doublepost]
This “CEO” is certainly the worst that could have happened to Apple. The proof his only interest is politics is his manipulation of the words meaning, trying to convince us there’s a difference between “policy” and “politics”. With this, he’s adding insult to injury. His comments are so manipulating that I don’t know if it’s worse to have him as Apple CEO or as a politician. Maybe it’s better he stays as Apple CEO... I prefer to lose Apple rather than more important things in the world. The sad thing is that when he ruins Apple, he will jump into a political career anyway. Sigh, evil has to exist (*).Cook clarified that Apple does not "get into politics”
These CEO's absolutely don't care about the country, once this country is ruined, they will just go to another country and sell their product. But rude awakening CHINA WILL NOT SELL NON-CHINESE PRODUCT! So if that's their master plan, good luck.
What about the 6+ year old Mac mini?
What's the problem now? Why are they not updating macs?
Other computer manufactures update regularly 1-2times per year. Apple used to but now they don't, it's a joke.
This “CEO” is certainly the worst that could have happened to Apple. The proof his only interest is politics is his manipulation of the words meaning, trying to convince us there’s a difference between “policy” and “politics”. With this, he’s adding insult to injury. His comments are so manipulating that I don’t know if it’s worse to have him as Apple CEO or as a politician. Maybe it’s better he stays as Apple CEO... I prefer to lose Apple rather than more important things in the world. The sad thing is that when he ruins Apple, he will jump into a political career anyway. Sigh, evil has to exist.
Look Tim? You’re talking about politics. All the time. Your tricks pretending to deny it don’t work. This “CEO” cannot open his mouth without going directly to the offtopic/political section of the forums.I honestly can’t remember the last time Tim Cook spoke about the Mac with the passion that he does about politics.