You got that right, when the top of the line New Mac Pro and rMBP 15 is sporting 3 year old hardware (CPU/GPU!), they don't even get the small improvements right!Not always about perception,but sometimes just common sense. What has Tim Cook brought to the table that's excelled?
Apple Pay? Nope.
Apple Watch? Nope.
Apple Music? Nope.
Everything else has been ridiculously small improvements over someone else's inventions.
You're totaly right.And Jobs never felt the need to appear on tv/speak with Cramer to try to prop the stock up. Jobs just followed the advice of Paul McCartney and "Let It Be"©![]()
We all know that was what made Apple great. So the question is: Is Tim incapable of emulating Steve, or is he just choosing not to?Not that I dislike Tim but I miss Jobs, he was uncompromising in his vision and that's what made Apple what it is/was.
Tim Cook is desperate. Prepare for the usual talking points, "Apple is as innovative as we've ever been", etc. But running Apple is like being the Governor of California. It is almost impossible to do well, unless you are someone like Steve Jobs.
Without someone like him at the helm, Apple will be unmanageable. The problem isn't that Tim Cook is a bad CEO (I don't think he is). I just think that Apple requires a very unique individual at the helm. Unfortunately that kind of person is 1 in 6 billion (give or take).
Tim: It's true, Jimmy. May I call you Jimmy? We've run out of ideas at Apple and our computer line up
is a prehistoric, over priced, steaming pile of junk. But we've got plenty of money to buy people
and companies who still have great ideas. Our innovative and magical vision is to throw lots of money
against the wall and see what sticks with our hordes of ever obedient and oh so pliant iSheeple.
Can I interest you in an amazing watch band? No?
Jimmy: Wooooooooooooooo
"We remain optimistic about China", "Incredible market opportunity", "We care about creating amazing products", "Incredible product pipeline", "Incredible customer satisfaction numbers", "Incredible team", "Strong US$"...-ish
... Incredibly easy to predict what he will say. Boring, even.
But he is right, you know.
Tim: It's true, Jimmy. May I call you Jimmy? We've run out of ideas at Apple and our computer line up
is a prehistoric, over priced, steaming pile of junk. But we've got plenty of money to buy people
and companies who still have great ideas. Our innovative and magical vision is to throw lots of money
against the wall and see what sticks with our hordes of ever obedient and oh so pliant iSheeple.
Can I interest you in an amazing watch band? No?
Jimmy: Wooooooooooooooo
SJ put all of his passion and soul into building products that people loved. Tim Cook seems to be more concerned about stock price these days.
![]()
You mean an arrogant ass with an absolute vision? Jobs was a you know what alright, but good God did he have vision and was a hell of a salesman and spin doctor.
But he was also a perfectionist.
I don't hold Cook anywhere near Jobs, Jobs was entertaining to watch despite what you thought of him, Cook is someone you would boo of the stage he's so utterly dull, and the rest aren't much better either. Ive should just never be allowed to speak in a product video, unapologetically plastic!
But who would replace Cook?
The CEO is responsible to the board for delivering ROI to the shareholders. You do that by envisioning and launching game changing products in the tech space. Cook is a failure as a CEO.
So like I said then. But who would you have replace him?
Foreign cash can buy companies, just can't be repatriated to the original firm!That cash is stuck overseas and if repatriated would take a 35% haircut due to taxes.
Not that I dislike Tim but I miss Jobs, he was uncompromising in his vision and that's what made Apple what it is/was.
I feel like they need a more tech-oriented guy at the top. Cook is a numbers guy and is tremendous at that, but I feel like he doesn't use the products enough to be critical of them when they are less than they could be.
Wouldn't mind seeing what someone like Craig Federighi (SVP of Software Engineering) would come up with if given control. Or maybe bring back Avie Tevanian.
It could be a lot worse, I don't see what the guy has done wrong. We have more choice under Cook, bigger iPhone's for a start, and since job died Apple has grown. They have had one bad quarter and everyone is over reacting, they made 10 billion in profits and sold more iPhone's than any other company can probably dream of for one quarter.