Yale, Harvard, Princeton, MIT, Cornell. Those are just off the top of my head.
Plenty in NYC alone! You are forgetting that NYC is the other great media city.
All liberal places.
You're welcome.
Yale, Harvard, Princeton, MIT, Cornell. Those are just off the top of my head.
Plenty in NYC alone! You are forgetting that NYC is the other great media city.
New York film schools pale in comparison to LA. Everyone in media knows this. New York has great film programs if "art" is your goal, but everyone knows that LA is where it's at if you want a job in the industry.
And no, what happens in California can't be replicated elsewhere. If that were true, we'd see other states driving the US economy, but we don't.
http://www.lamag.com/culturefiles/california-carrying-american-economy-right-now/
I fail to see how CO2 which is not a poison and is easily converted into O2 by anything that contains Chlorophyll is 100% evil? Sure we may need to limit it but I think we also need to look at the whole thing and maybe it's a combination of an explosive population's needs/wants/desires and the Earth not being able to support that many people.
It's a multi-pronged approach and maybe instead of encouraging people to have 2, 3, 4+ kids we encourage them to have 0 or 1 to get population under control? That will take care of both - less people means less drain on the Earth's resources, less carbon used, etc.
You are HILARIOUS. NOTHING CA DOES CANNOT BE REPLICATED ELSEWHERE!!! PERIOD, END OF STORY! Citing LA Magazine about how CA is carrying the economy is like quoting NY Magazine about how great NY is.....
Yes!! 5 days out from WWDC and Cook is focusing on this??In other news, Apple customers urge Tim Cook to focus on Apple.
You don't see the irony that they are asserting NY can help replace CA? You know, NY, the bastion of ultra-conservatism.New York film schools pale in comparison to LA. Everyone in media knows this. New York has great film programs if "art" is your goal, but everyone knows that LA is where it's at if you want a job in the industry.
[/QUOTE]Yale, Harvard, Princeton, MIT, Cornell. Those are just off the top of my head.
Plenty in NYC alone! You are forgetting that NYC is the other great media city.
Your mistake is thinking CA is the epicenter of the USA. It's not - nothing they do or make can't be replicated elsewhere.
So now you are backpedaling - first it was nobody and now it's Far More?
You don't see the irony that they are asserting NY can help replace CA? You know, NY, the bastion of ultra-conservatism.
Mike
Yea but they included the game-winning, "period, end of story!" In CAPS. Bolded! Doesn't that always mean you won the debate?Oh, I see the irony. I'm just pointing out that they are flat wrong and anyone who works in the industry knows that New York schools can't hold a candle to LA schools especially in terms of getting a job in the industry after school.
Yea but they included the game-winning, "period, end of story!" In caps. BOLDED! Doesn't that always mean you won the debate?
Mike
SHHHHHHHH! We don't talk about that.Good decision. Climate change is a political money grab. You can't predict the weather for my neighborhood but you want me to believe you can predict it for the entire planet. There is no evidence that man is causing climate change. The climate changes on its own. We didn't populate the earth until the end of the last ice age. What caused the change then?
The keynote's written for them. They practice in the 1-2 days leading up to it, if I'm not mistaken, then read the prompter for a couple hours and it's done.Stay out of politics Tim and worry about the keynote next week.
I have no idea. They're opinions to help out people that are not able to help themselves. Why would I raise it with MR? It's simply not an issue for me. Again, I know my requirements and can easily come to my own purchase decisions.
Moving goal posts? Just responding to your assertions.
Good decision. Climate change is a political money grab. You can't predict the weather for my neighborhood but you want me to believe you can predict it for the entire planet. There is no evidence that man is causing climate change. The climate changes on its own. We didn't populate the earth until the end of the last ice age. What caused the change then?
The keynote's written for them. They practice in the 1-2 days leading up to it, if I'm not mistaken, then read the prompter for a couple hours and it's done.
That's not a very logical argument. The planet needs water to support life, but too much water would be catastrophic as well. It's a finely tuned system, and we're in the process of screwing it up with greenhouse gases. This isn't in dispute, it's just a fact.I'm more worried about the toxic particles the come from fossil fuel run vehicles than some naturally occurring molecule like CO2 which the earth needs to even support life on this damn planet.
MH01 said:So be honest his much better as the latter...his presentation at the keynotes can put people with insomnia to sleep
There's no debate among experts, only among quacks, conspiracy theorists, the uneducated, and cynical politicians. The science is settled.There is no settled scientific consensus. Earth has been hotter than now before Mankind set foot on it and it has gone through ebbs and flows of heating and cooling.
Blaming the carbon boogeyman is nonsense. You can just as easily plot the population explosion in the 20th and 21st centuries as the cause...
Good decision. Climate change is a political money grab. You can't predict the weather for my neighborhood but you want me to believe you can predict it for the entire planet. There is no evidence that man is causing climate change. The climate changes on its own. We didn't populate the earth until the end of the last ice age. What caused the change then?
The environment isn't political. We all live in it.
Apple is pursuing a way to avoid increasing costs of scarcity of natural resources by reclaiming items from eWaste/consumer discards.
Apple's costs could rise, so ultimately Tim is showing his concern for Apple as well.
He doesn't have to stay out of politics. He's a US citizen and can say whatever he wants. And since he's the head of one of the wealthiest corporations in the world, what he says is newsworthy.
Particulate matter drives smog at high enough levels; that's the correct term.yes Climate Change is natural, at some point the Sahara will be green again as it was thousands of years ago but that does not mean that we are not speeding up the whole process. with that logic humans could just sit around doing nothing about anything at all because "it will happen anyway". yes we all die at some point but that does not mean i want to live in air pollution like china at old age
i live in the city with the worst air pollution in all of Germany (Stuttgart) but people do not care because they cannot yet "see" the pollution. I bet if we had smog instead of particulate matter (is that the correct term?) people here would be more open to leave their cars at home. however humans are stupid and selfish so unless something has an impact on your own well being and only when it is too late we change