nei dont have calculator.Okay, let’s phrase this for someone unwaveringly in-line with Apple’s vision: does Apple want the iPad to be considered a computer, yes or no?
nei dont have calculator.Okay, let’s phrase this for someone unwaveringly in-line with Apple’s vision: does Apple want the iPad to be considered a computer, yes or no?
somebody will do rm -rf so not secure anymore 😇For some functions the ipad can be considered to be a computer replacement with IOS roots.
Okay, let’s phrase this for someone unwaveringly in-line with Apple’s vision: does Apple want the iPad to be considered a computer, yes or no?
Okay, let’s phrase this for someone unwaveringly in-line with Apple’s vision: does Apple want the iPad to be considered a computer, yes or no?
The iPad is a computer, regardless of whether people want to acknowledge it as such.
It’s also an alternative, rather than a replacement for the Mac, which makes sense, because this means that users have a choice between two distinct computing experiences depending on their needs.
The iPhone is NO MORE THAN a fancy computer !
Unfortunately, most who own one don't know the difference between DRAM & NAND Flash Storage !
I didn’t ask whether any of you consider the iPad to be a computer, I asked specifically if Apple wants it to be considered a computer.
Too many in here don't seem to grasp what general computing is. What are our everyday devices we need to get a myriad things done.
An Xbox is pretty specifically for games. An oven is for cooking food. Is an iPhone just for making calls? Is it locked down to just that? No. It can install software to do anything your heart desires. It is a general computing device. It needs to be open. I hope the congressmen see through to this.
Trying to jump through hoops to somehow "define" the iPhone/iPad as being less than a general purpose device is just making excuses.
Okay Mr. Congress. Start with Google, Facebook and Amazon...then take on Apple. Should be 5-10 years at that point.1.) AAPL has a Complete & Total Stranglehold on "App Discovery" in their "curated" iOS App Stores around the world !
2.) AAPL "Plays Favorites".
Both are easy to prove !
New Law, that will illustrate both to the General Public, will begin to be drafted (by Congress) shortly AFTER today's Hearing !
The General Public will begin to hear-about the details 1-3 weeks from now.
I don't expect much, if anything, out of today's Hearing.
Let the "Trust Busting" begin ! ...
A doctor giving you a lifesaving surgery, depending on their iphone, doesn't need to know the difference.The iPhone is NO MORE THAN a fancy computer !
Unfortunately, most who own one don't know the difference between DRAM & NAND Flash Storage !
Correction. Android is the dominant platform. Windows screwed itself over and should have taken on android.So you're all for unchecked capitalism then? Alright.
iOS and Android are the two dominant platforms. They both deserve scrutiny.
But Apple won't allow Netflix to even tell you that's an option. Apps could provide a 15%/7.5% discount which would simultaneously save both users and developers money. Apple would take their 30%/15% cut from people who do sign up through the app because they value using Apple's payments, or don't know any better. But Apple wants to force everyone into the latter choice, for obvious reasons.
This is the key point of the whole issue that everyone keeps missing. It's not about whether 30% is the right number, it's about a) not even allowing apps to tell users that they have options for where to sign up that might be cheaper, and b) not allowing third party apps access to all the functionality that Apple's own apps enjoy. The latter is the key difference between Apple and other stores like PlayStation.
That's your problem. At the end of the day, developers are complaining that they don't have a choice to bypass the 30% / 15% Apple fee which is false because they do. Now you can make a good case that it's wrong that Apple doesn't allow Netflix to let users know, within the app itself, that users can sign up on Netflix's website for cheaper. I would agree that. But regarding the scenario that you described, which is exactly how it works by the way, I have no issue with it.it's so mind-boggling that I don't even consider it to be rational.
I agree and this is wrong and should be changed.But Apple won't allow Netflix to even tell you that's an option.
Xcode 12 — which has this year’s SDKs for macOS Big Sur, iOS/“iPadOS” 14, watchOS 7, and tvOS 14 — allows you to deploy back to iOS 9 if you want.Don't say I didn't have to update because we are forced to update iOS because the App Store forces all future apps updates to be compiled on the latest Xcode that only runs on the latest iOS version.
What if MacOS had the same restrictions in regards installing apps?
That's a business decision, not a law.They are collectively the dominant platform. Nobody thinks of just Android. Nobody releases on just Android.
But not in the App Store, just locally. Right?Xcode 12 — which has this year’s SDKs for macOS Big Sur, iOS/“iPadOS” 14, watchOS 7, and tvOS 14 — allows you to deploy back to iOS 9 if you want.
When macOS, Windows, iOS, and Android all eventually and inevitably follow the trend and disallow freedom to install apps outside a curated store, let’s just all accept it and use the excuse “well you could always go linux”