Good one. We all know Musk is in charge
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple CEO Tim Cook Will Attend Trump Inauguration
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
That's why I said what I said. This type of stuff should not be taught in schools. Unfortunately there's far too many that feel this sort of ideology needs to be promoted at all costs, hence the indoctrination currently infesting schools/ciriculum. In cases such as that, the government needs to step in, protect children and put a stop to it.
He also said he didn't want his kids to "Grow up in a racial jungle" but Trump's the bigot.
Says who? Who has the right to say this should or should not be taught in schools? Gay people exist. Tim Cook is one of them. If we can't say it's OK to be gay to kids, then they'll feel like they have something wrong with them if they are indeed gay (because after all, gay people are born gay).
There are direct correlations between reducing resources for non-straight kids and an increase in suicides.
While some people take things too far with their rhetoric, there are some valid concerns about some specific material and parents should ultimately have more control and oversight over their kid's education.
However, if parents are abusive to their gay kids, they absolutely should have CPS come after them.
Last edited:
He also pushed the War on Drugs with Strom Thurmond and helped cause the very problems he's been pretending to rectify for the past 4 years regarding criminal injustice done to victims of abuse.
Of course there should be moderation. Drag shows don't belong in schools for example. But don't dehumanize a gay kid and tell them that they're "other" because they aren't straight. That's ridiculous. Plus, one parent shouldn't have the right to dictate to another child how they should learn. That's when the "parents' rights" movement goes sideways. Parent A has a right to have control over Child A's learning, but Parent A doesn't have a right to control Child B's learning.
Here in Florida, the "specific material" thing was something though. Once books were allowed to be banned by request of an adult, it was discovered many adults who didn't even have kids attending school or were childless were the ones making requests. Then liberals joined in and had Christian books removed from schools as they were also considered offensive. It was all a farce. Eventually Governor DeSantis admitted his book ban law went too far.
So when Child A B and C are in school, and Parent A complains about the curriculum, that will affect Child A B and C equally. What happens to the rights of Parent B and Parent C?
That's not true at all. The original curriculum for Child B and Child C were taken away by Parent A.
It is true. In your scenario you mentioned nothing about it being taken away or having it changed. You said Parent A made a complaint. That's all. Parents B & C can also make complaints or offer support in favor of the current curriculum. It (I would assume) would then go to a school board for review, public comment etc and only then would changes (if any) would be enacted.
If nothing changes and Parent A is still pissed then they can remove their child (as can Parents B & C) from the school and go to another school, or homeschool.
That's fair. I feel the adequate policy here would be to have an alternative curriculum for the parents of kids who are offended by LGBTQ books. That way their children are taught the way they want, and they don't force their will on the other students and parents who could care less about the penguin character in the book being gay, for example.
And it’s official. All silicone valley bend the knee to trump. Let’s now make America great again 💕
I also hope the next 2 years Google to stop hiding conservative news from its searches…… let’s see also improvements there too.
I also hope the next 2 years Google to stop hiding conservative news from its searches…… let’s see also improvements there too.
I installed the Chrome Trump news blocker which seemed to work pretty well, but it and others like it are already being pulled by Google.
What was it called when they did that for Obama and Biden? Let me guess, liberation fee? 😄
Everything silicon valley and the left does is virtue signalling. From the stupid watch bands to the rainbow colored logos once a year. The more virtue we put out there the worse things get. Thankfully a lot of that is finally getting pulled back with the retraction many corporations are doing with DEI initiatives.
Lazy response. Such as?
That's not true. Take a look at Martha's Vineyard. People were there waiting to receive them with... Oh wait, never mind. 😄
You left the most important part out from that 51 year old case. They were not found guilty.
They settled the lawsuit, which they were not required to acknowledge discrimination but the settlement was still described as the Trumps failed and neglected to comply with the Fair Housing Act and they had to change their practices.
The guy is almost 80, way past retirement. He had a huge incentive to campaign for President, to pardon himself and avoid jail. From some of the news clips I saw of Trump during his campaign he seemed very tired, slurring speech, mispronouncing words, and perhaps behaving loopy because he was so tired.
Yes, I don’t like Trump. He wants to put 25% tariffs on Canada…for what? He claims because there is a trade surplus in Canada’s favour (when Americans have a much larger population and you buy a lot of energy and resources from Canada) or because he has this really stupid ignorant concept he can use economic force to make Canada a 51st state (by far the dumbest thing he has uttered so far). The tariffs could also simply be collateral damage on Canada because the actual target is China; put tariffs on Canada and Mexico to soften the tariffs blow on China. China's trade surplus with the US is enormous compared to Canada and China has 1,100 million more people compared to the US.
Last edited:
No, the slurred speech and mispronounced words are because he's an imbecile. Nothing to do with tiredness.
In Europe we have a name for this behavior….corruption.
That have it in the US too but the first 10 characters are silent.
We have cronies in the Uk, not saying for a second that we're even remotely close to the word perfect, (in fact I'm not even sure I should use that word in the same discussion as the word Trump).
But what I see/hear happening in the states truly boggles my mind.
I watched a film called Dark Water, (has Mark Ruffalo - it's worth a watch), last night and what large corporations do in full view of the powers that be is truly shocking.
Huh, evidence?? Why??
No need anymore! This is a new era!
Anyone can say everything he/she wants, without a shred of evidence. Well, as long as it supports the new oligarchic system ofcourse. Or does that go both ways?
You can say anything you want...no moderation! Hurray!
Saddening , criminal and stupid.