if you dont like how Apple behaves then buy something else. that's simple really. alternatives exist...Apple deserves to be fined. It isn't a very ethical company to say the least, I'm not sure if any large American company is then again.
if you dont like how Apple behaves then buy something else. that's simple really. alternatives exist...Apple deserves to be fined. It isn't a very ethical company to say the least, I'm not sure if any large American company is then again.
The EU is only acting to bolster its walletIt is a cheap shot to claim that the EU is acting unfairly against Apple, given that the EU is acting in the interests of EU consumers.
Except: you don’t.
Sideloading on iOS has existed - and been officially offered by Apple - for almost 15 years.
It was no problem at all, when it benefitted Apple in iPhones being adopted by large enterprises.
They just contractually prohibited it from being used for distribution to end users.
Why the EU should never receive anything other than a phone that makes callsexcept the rules keep changing...
The problem arises when someone being able to ask any price (or business term) free from competitive pressure.If you use someone’s property, you need to compensate them for that using they ask.
Wrong.Except you do, you have no idea how different using it for enterprise is or the steps involved to be able to use it for enterprise. Very different things.
Apple can sight "design requirements" needed their RAM and SSD... "risk of overheating/fires/thermal load".As an EU citizen, I would be in favour of the EU stopping all this nonsense about opening up Apple's ecosystem and forcing Tim Apple to make RAM and SSD upgradable in Macs instead.
I purchase Apple products for their walled garden ecosystem. Vetted software and all that. If I wanted third party software, I would've bought an android.
Android exists and competes fiercely for developers and users.The problem arises when someone being able to ask any price (or business term) free from competitive pressure.
at this stage I think Apple would be well within their rights to sell Android OS devices in EU or fork the iOS and not add new features for EU phones. see how long before residents complain and vote out those making these demandsWhy the EU should never receive anything other than a phone that makes calls
As an EU citizen, I would be in favour of the EU stopping all this nonsense about opening up Apple's ecosystem and forcing Tim Apple to make RAM and SSD upgradable in Macs instead.
But the Apple App Store does not compete with Google Play for app transactions.Android exists and competes fiercely for developers and users.
But the Apple App Store does not compete with Google Play for app transactions.
They have separate user bases (with barriers to switch between the two).
That’s not something Apple wanted. And it will fight tooth and nail for what it believes.We can argue semantics all day but the fact remains that all Apple had to do was give the iPhone parity with the Mac in terms of app installations and all it's litigation problems would evaporate. Instead it continues to fight the wording of the law by hiring developers in so much bureaucracy that if Apple were a country we'd call them a nanny state.
It's like it somehow trusts Mac users to be smart enough to manage things but somehow thinks iPhone owners need babysitting?! As an iPhone user I'm frankly insulted.
iOS has somewhere between 10x and 20x the number of users than MacOS. It is completely valid to think that a system that works well for a smaller, more technical user base isn't appropriate for a larger, less technical one.What desktop or laptop computer do you use?
It’s a de facto duopoly - in which the App Store does not directly compete with the Play Store and vice versa.Plenty of competition.
What is stopping Apple from raising their commission rate to 40% or 60% tomorrow (absent alternative stores/purchasing options)? And what’s stopping them from doing it in collusion with Google?Just because you and the EU doesn't recognize it doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
And Android is completely open, and no third party store has gotten the Play Store to reduce its rates or change its conditions, which highly suggests the rates and conditions are actually competitive.It’s a de facto duopoly - in which the App Store does not directly compete with the Play Store and vice versa.
Oh, and they have basically the same terms, conditions and pricing.
It would push developers to stop developing for Android and develop for the competitors. If Apple's rules are as stifling to developers as you claim, the only thing keeping them on iOS is that they make money. Raising the commission would harm that and reduce the incentive to develop for iOS, because Apple and Android actually do compete despite your protestations otherwise.What is stopping Apple from raising their commission rate to 40% or 60% tomorrow (absent alternative stores/purchasing options)?
Of course I did, a Sabrent Rocket Xtrme 2 TB.buy a cheap external drive is usually the answer to high internal drive costs.
Exactly, the only thing Apple ever tries to protect is its profits. Pure greed under the guise of protecting the consumer.Funny, while trying to defend Apple you've still managed to concede their shockingly petulant nature (as can be seen in every bizarre public statement they've made about this), and how much value they really place on "doing what's right for consumers" as opposed to protecting their ~80% App Store margins or 90%+ Safari (Google search deal) margins.
So given that macOS is the 2nd most popular desktop operating system (behind Windows), let’s not pretend that iOS has only a small minority market share. 😉iOS has somewhere between 10x and 20x the number of users than MacOS
Under your theory, all of the antitrust actions that applied to Windows should have applied to Apple with 10% of the market because Microsoft and Apple had a "duopoly" in the 1990s. I think we all realize why that's ridiculous. It may be slightly less ridiculous when Apple has 28% of the market, but it's still ridiculous.So given that macOS is the 2nd most popular desktop operating system (behind Windows), let’s not pretend that iOS has only a small minority market share. 😉