Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
We can argue semantics all day but the fact remains that all Apple had to do was give the iPhone parity with the Mac in terms of app installations and all it's litigation problems would evaporate. Instead it continues to fight the wording of the law by hiring developers in so much bureaucracy that if Apple were a country we'd call them a nanny state.

It's like it somehow trusts Mac users to be smart enough to manage things but somehow thinks iPhone owners need babysitting?! As an iPhone user I'm frankly insulted.
 
Except: you don’t.

Sideloading on iOS has existed - and been officially offered by Apple - for almost 15 years.
It was no problem at all, when it benefitted Apple in iPhones being adopted by large enterprises.

They just contractually prohibited it from being used for distribution to end users.

Except you do, you have no idea how different using it for enterprise is or the steps involved to be able to use it for enterprise. Very different things.
 
If you use someone’s property, you need to compensate them for that using they ask.
The problem arises when someone being able to ask any price (or business term) free from competitive pressure.

Except you do, you have no idea how different using it for enterprise is or the steps involved to be able to use it for enterprise. Very different things.
Wrong.

I’ve downloaded and installed enterprise apps myself.
On my own, personal (non-supervised/non-MDM enrolled) device.

It is literally as easy opening a web site, downloading an app and confirming to install it
Just have to trust the developer in the Settings app (this could be more user-friendly, but that’d only be a “cosmetic” change of the dialogue, nothing about the innards of the system).
I linked to Apple’s instructions above.

It was very eye-opening.
 
Last edited:
As an EU citizen, I would be in favour of the EU stopping all this nonsense about opening up Apple's ecosystem and forcing Tim Apple to make RAM and SSD upgradable in Macs instead.
Apple can sight "design requirements" needed their RAM and SSD... "risk of overheating/fires/thermal load".

Or they could go the ink jet cartridge route and add chip checks to disallow third party or selected Apple approved ones.

you know the upgrade route isnt viable before purchasing.
if you dont like it, buy something else.
no one is forcing you to choose Apple products.

go look on AliBaba for USB drives "$30 for 64TB" and then half the reviews are how slow the memory is, incompatible, only 57MB... and someone who buys this and installs it will blame Apple. :)

buy a cheap external drive is usually the answer to high internal drive costs.
 
As an EU citizen, I would be in favour of the EU stopping all this nonsense about opening up Apple's ecosystem and forcing Tim Apple to make RAM and SSD upgradable in Macs instead.

Whoa! Tickle my senses why don't ya!
This is a tough choice, I have to admit!

The RAM/SSD gouging is beyond frustrating.
 
We can argue semantics all day but the fact remains that all Apple had to do was give the iPhone parity with the Mac in terms of app installations and all it's litigation problems would evaporate. Instead it continues to fight the wording of the law by hiring developers in so much bureaucracy that if Apple were a country we'd call them a nanny state.

It's like it somehow trusts Mac users to be smart enough to manage things but somehow thinks iPhone owners need babysitting?! As an iPhone user I'm frankly insulted.
That’s not something Apple wanted. And it will fight tooth and nail for what it believes.

The DMA is poorly written and the goalposts keep changing. And be reminded it’s an opt in business relationship with Apple. Nobody has a gun to anyone’s head to force them to become a developer.
 
Plenty of competition.
It’s a de facto duopoly - in which the App Store does not directly compete with the Play Store and vice versa.
Oh, and they have basically the same terms, conditions and pricing.

Just because you and the EU doesn't recognize it doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
What is stopping Apple from raising their commission rate to 40% or 60% tomorrow (absent alternative stores/purchasing options)? And what’s stopping them from doing it in collusion with Google?

Especially since their commissions aren’t transparently communicated to consumers - but absorbed by developers.
 
It’s a de facto duopoly - in which the App Store does not directly compete with the Play Store and vice versa.
Oh, and they have basically the same terms, conditions and pricing.
And Android is completely open, and no third party store has gotten the Play Store to reduce its rates or change its conditions, which highly suggests the rates and conditions are actually competitive.

What is stopping Apple from raising their commission rate to 40% or 60% tomorrow (absent alternative stores/purchasing options)?
It would push developers to stop developing for Android and develop for the competitors. If Apple's rules are as stifling to developers as you claim, the only thing keeping them on iOS is that they make money. Raising the commission would harm that and reduce the incentive to develop for iOS, because Apple and Android actually do compete despite your protestations otherwise.
 
Funny, while trying to defend Apple you've still managed to concede their shockingly petulant nature (as can be seen in every bizarre public statement they've made about this), and how much value they really place on "doing what's right for consumers" as opposed to protecting their ~80% App Store margins or 90%+ Safari (Google search deal) margins.
Exactly, the only thing Apple ever tries to protect is its profits. Pure greed under the guise of protecting the consumer.
 
So given that macOS is the 2nd most popular desktop operating system (behind Windows), let’s not pretend that iOS has only a small minority market share. 😉
Under your theory, all of the antitrust actions that applied to Windows should have applied to Apple with 10% of the market because Microsoft and Apple had a "duopoly" in the 1990s. I think we all realize why that's ridiculous. It may be slightly less ridiculous when Apple has 28% of the market, but it's still ridiculous.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.