Well then, it seems that you do not know from experience, that with Photoshop on a Mac, you can have one monitor with a zoomed view while having another with a 1 to 1 image updating in real time. With Photoshop in Windows, you can only use multiple monitors to arrange your tools inside of one of them, while your main images are all relegated to living inside of the other - ONE monitor at a time, and all the tiling options in the world doesn't really help this.
Sounds neat. Again, its too bad OS X doesn't properly support multiple displays.
Gotta love how that unified menubar works across multiple displays, huh?
iMacs, Minis, and Pro's utilize OS X's multi-display capabilities just fine - no hacking necessary.
Never had the problems you speak of with portables such as the MBP.
Well, let's see. If I have a MacBook with a built-in display and I want to use an external display I have to do either one of a couple of things to get it to use ONLY the external display. One way being opening the system, hitting the power button, then closing it real fast before the display kicks on. Then it will boot to the external display. The other way being booting up normally, connecting the display, sleeping the system by closing the lid, and then waking it up with an external keyboard and mouse.
With Windows I connect the display, the first time it detects it it asks me if I want to extend, clone, or use the external display only. I click what I want and from that point on Windows always remembers my settings. So I can boot normally and it will automatically switch to the display, or I can plug the display in while I'm using the system and it will automatically switch over to my preferred settings.
The best part is that Windows automatically detects and sets the optimal display resolution and refresh rate. In OS X I have to set it manually.
Some HDTVs are 1366x768. No option for that in OS X. In fact, all of the times I've connected my MacBook to a 720p HD set, there hasn't even been an option for 1280x720! Only 1280x768. Funny enough, if I boot into Windows it will see what resolution needs to be set and set it. I can even manually type in 1366x768 in Windows and it will properly set it, pixel perfect.
Again, you know this from experience? I use both ProTools and Logic Pro - Logic Pro happens to handle MIDI and synths much better.
And I know several musicians, with actual recording contracts, who laugh at those who suggest they use Macs with Logic Pro.
Stability? HAH!! While everyone around me was restarting 14 times a day, defragging once a week, and suffering through BSOD, I was more productive using OS 9 on a scale of two to one. If you have OS X crashing the way you claim that you do, either you have a hardware/RAM problem or you are running it with some heavily corrupt system files.
Its funny how you say my system has hardware problems after mentioning the BSOD. BSOD is caused by driver/hardware issues

OS X crashing is caused by OS X being unstable.
On every system I've run OS X and had it crash on, I've had Windows be 100% rock solid stable on the same system. No faulty hardware, just a faulty built-in OS.
All versions of Mac OS prior to OS X had co-operative multi-tasking. That means that anything trying to run in the background had the life sucked out of it and full system resources were dedicated to the "in focus" app. You know how you can encode a movie in iMovie in the background while continuing on with whatever you want otherwise in OS X? Yeah, Windows has been doing that since the mid 90s

If you tried something like that on any Mac OS before OS X that process would crawl to a halt and practically never finish until you brought the app back into focus.
Restarting 14 times a day? Hmm. Yeah, definitely an exaggeration. So is the "defragging once a week" comment. Defragging takes less time than it does for OS X to recover from a kernel panic + repairing permissions.
And all others, when frayed, would not be? I have over six Magsafe chords, none which exhibit the slightest appearance of fraying.
http://store.apple.com/us/product/MA938LL/A?fnode=MTY1NDEwMQ&mco=MjE0ODI1Nw
http://store.apple.com/us/product/MA538LL/B?fnode=MTY1NDEwMQ&mco=MjE0ODI1MA
Theres quite a few people there who would like to disagree with you.
You know its bad when MagSafe is the only power adapter that requires support documents to tell users how to "properly" use it
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1453
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1630
You'd think something so "innovate" and safe would be simple plug and play.
Exactly. That is why I pull the images off the card directly onto the hard drive. iPhoto is slower because it sorts and arranges the photos while it imports - This can be done after the images are loaded onto the HD.
How does it sort the photos exactly? All it does is organize them, by default, by date taken. Exactly what Windows and Windows Photo Gallery do. Windows and Photo Gallery do it in mere seconds compared to iPhoto's minutes. Pulling directly off the card in Windows with any app in Windows takes well less than 1/4 of the time it takes to pull the pictures off the camera via USB using any method in OS X. You can thank the lack of a card reader and Apple's poor USB support for the snail-like speeds.