Compatibility is a mess that might leave you unable to boot into OS X without removing the other card. Even then you might have to swap around the video cable since OS X will default to stock video card.For those of us who have no idea why this idea isn't decent could you please explain?
Please tell me you've done some research into this.
Compatibility is a mess that might leave you unable to boot into OS X without removing the other card. Even then you might have to swap around the video cable since OS X will default to stock video card.
I don't want to be the one swapping video cables or removing a card each time I want to reboot my system into another OS.
So no, it doesn't just work dropping in a secondary Windows-only card unless you plan on just running Windows and hoping you can get back into OS X. It can be tough finding the right display with multiple digital inputs.
40 PCI-Express 2.0 lanes are available and can be controlled somewhat using the Expansion Slot Utility.PCIe slots 1 and 2 are x16.
Slots 3 and 4 are x4.
As long as there's actual physical room (i.e. some cards have huge heatsinks) why on earth wouldn't that work? 😕
40 PCI-Express 2.0 lanes are available and can be controlled somewhat using the Expansion Slot Utility.
All four slots are mechanically/physically 16 lanes though and the chassis can accept a full length card. What's the point of this information though?
Apple should be doing responding using things like this:
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-10222213-37.html
PCI-Express 2.0 is backward compatible with 1.1 and 1.0. The signaling will still be limited by your slowest link in the chain though. Be it the chipset and motherboard or the video card itself.Had to make sure Apple wasn't using some weird, non-standard voltages or something else that would create compatibility issues with other graphics cards. I admit it, I don't know a whole lot about this...apparently it's not as straightforward as it seems.
Apple should be responding with things like this:
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-10222213-37.html
Agreed...however, I would have expected MUCH HIGHER ratings from Apple since they own the hardware, OS, and very likely the apps people are calling in for help.
80% is pretty sad (in my opinion) for a company who makes the whole darn thing...and for a company who claims "it just works"...well, it doesn't work (obviously) and if 20% of your upset customers still give you a bad grade on the tech support call, that's even more an embarrassment.
Although I feel all computer companies pretty much stink at Tech Support, the PC vendors of the world rarely get good ratings because each vendor (Dell, HP, whoever) may only "support" certain items. Of course you can pay for additional "coverage" like Microsoft Office tech support through Dell. But overall nobody is going to spend a lot of time trying to help you. Great example: My dad called Comcast the other night because his MS Outlook was failing to send a message. Comcast immediately told him to call Microsoft. I'm surprised Comcast didn't tell him to call Dell.
It's usually just a finger pointing game. I'm a techie and I hate calling any tech support because I am keenly aware of their inabilities.
Anyway, the Support business is a tough business to make friends and get good marks...people are calling in mad (do you ever call Tech Support happy?) and there's a 30% chance (or higher) that at the end of the call the end user is unhappy about what the fix was (deleting something, losing data, reinstalling, long hold times, long time to fix, dropped call, uninstalling/disabling something else to fix the initial problem, bring the computer in, send out a tech rep to replace a part, etc). So when they get that wonderful "would you like to participate in a survey?" from Biff the Sr. Tech Lead (who likely can't deduce why his Christmas tree lights aren't on), the end user is foaming at the mouth ready to give a nasty review.
-Eric
They are jealous of my gorgeous Mac, that's why.
So let me get this, 80 percent satisfaction ratings is sad, which other companies has such high ratings, if Apple's ratings is sad, then what do you call the likes of Dell and HP.
So let me get this, 80 percent satisfaction ratings is sad, which other companies has such high ratings, if Apple's ratings is sad, then what do you call the likes of Dell and HP.
Too many - the PC users - have told they agree with the adds: Macs are too expensive... the computer price: yes, a little more expensive, but with better software, with better configurations, better looks but specially, and that is the REAL PLUS: the OS. And not only because of how well it works, but because of something Windows has failed ALWAYS: viruses.
this is something all the PC users most agree: they most spend time and money, and even data lost - and sometimes, in the worst scenario, they may need to spend on a new computer - becuae of viruses. I have used Macs for 17 years, and I have never spent a dime, and therefore not a second because of a virus problem. Even before, thus it never was turned on, I had Norton Antivirus installed... but just because it was part of the Norton System Works, that I used just to keep the computer in optimal conditions, just for defragmentation. And now from some years 'till now I don't even use that kind of software any more, in fact there is no Norton for Macs anymore, because of the little you could need it.
Just that fact is a great advantage, a great save of money.
How many time, data and money a PC user could have spent in 17 years???.... and maybe even they had to change their computers, or at least some components!
Apple should be responding with things like this:
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-10222213-37.html
Can you explain why Apple also leads in iphone user satisfaction rates, and with ipods too or are their competitors in those fields also not providing unifying solutions so no comparisons can be made.
<yawn>...Here's another poorly-written rambling of how great Macs are...take it to another thread.
Apple has competitors in the iphone and ipod fields?
They probably lead in user satisfaction rates b/c they're the only ones that make iphones and ipods....
Maybe.
Apple has competitors in the iphone and ipod fields?
They probably lead in user satisfaction rates b/c they're the only ones that make iphones and ipods....
Maybe.
LOL so it's unfair for us to compare Apple with poor little Dell. Can you explain why Apple also leads in iphone user satisfaction rates, and with ipods too or are their competitors in those fields also not providing unifying solutions so no comparisons can be made.
Did you see in the article that this was the first time such a Survey gap existed (66% vs. 80%)?...and that it might be due to Vista's launch? And if you were to read in between the lines there, why are the hardware manufacturers getting bad marks for Microsoft's not-so-good operating system?
Dude, I'm not going to write a book on this topic. My points stand. You are generalizing my comments (and thanks for not quoting anything in particular).
If you want to hold a 9 hour seminar on this topic, invite me and the industry to it.
So, you've never had any problem with any virus on a PC, do you?... congratulations, you're the first one I know!! 😀