No, I see it to be as being pretty accurate. Most of the ignorant/childish comments that I've seen on the net seem to come from supposed regular users to tech journalists who are windows users and have never even used a mac for an extended period of time.Isn't that a bit of a childish remark? No wonder PC users see us as snobbish.![]()
erm no offense mate but aesthetics like many other things are subjective. only because you deem it visually superior doesn´t change the world for us. but we´re all freeyou know ubuntu slaughters OSX for visual aesthetics.
Earlier in the thread some were discussing EFI-X. I have a friend who owns a single core PowerMac G5 and he can't afford a Mac Pro. He does a lot of Final Cut work and needs a speed boost. I told him an iMac would be faster than what he currently has but a Mac Pro would probably be better for his needs. He simply can not afford $2500+. I mentioned an alternative, installing OS X on a Windows based system using x86/EFI-X. I also mentioned Pystar, which as I no longer live in NYC I can not be there to do the work for him.
My question is, if he were to consider a Pystar system (which I realize is a gamble as they are currently in court), do they allow software updates from Apple? I realize OS X Leopard comes preinstalled but my concern is if he were to update the system will it break the EFI-X? I checked Pystar's site and couldn't find anything. Thanks!
"its still a hyundai" >> this says you cant see past a brand name
Earlier in the thread some were discussing EFI-X. I have a friend who owns a single core PowerMac G5 and he can't afford a Mac Pro. He does a lot of Final Cut work and needs a speed boost. I told him an iMac would be faster than what he currently has but a Mac Pro would probably be better for his needs. He simply can not afford $2500+. I mentioned an alternative, installing OS X on a Windows based system using x86/EFI-X. I also mentioned Pystar, which as I no longer live in NYC I can not be there to do the work for him.
My question is, if he were to consider a Pystar system (which I realize is a gamble as they are currently in court), do they allow software updates from Apple? I realize OS X Leopard comes preinstalled but my concern is if he were to update the system will it break the EFI-X? I checked Pystar's site and couldn't find anything. Thanks!
Let me give you examples:
GAMES:
Console : Put Disc in and Play
PC: Where is the driver, oh **** it won't play cos it does not meet sys spec, take it back to store and argue the toss to get refund.
Mac: Mac owner are rich enough to buy a console ;-)
Mobile Phones
RIM: How do i set up email, oh i have to pay RIM, oh no never envisaged that. What I need an enterprise? - quick call Spock! Need to get a geek to set up email ouch.
iPhone: Easy set-up even my granny can do it. Cool People.
Computer:
PC: Buy spend hours configuring it, tweak it every day, download latest virus updates before you even start. Oh **** forgot to by Office grrrr. Geek
Mac: Buy, start and use. Cool People - that get things done.
Mobile Phones
RIM: How do i set up email, oh i have to pay RIM, oh no never envisaged that. What I need an enterprise? - quick call Spock! Need to get a geek to set up email ouch.
iPhone: Easy set-up even my granny can do it. Cool People.
You miss his point. If you have a PC that is not capable of doing what you want it to do, than it's a waste of money. But this goes for a MAC also.
Your examples really are terrible. Maybe in the world of an Apple obsessed fanboy life really plays out like that. The real world isn't quite so inept at getting non Apple stuff to work though.
I have an iPhone myself, but guess what? The President of the United States swears by his RIM Blackberry phone. Maybe he spends less time trying to be one of the "cool people" like your granny and spends more time getting real stuff done? Think different. Don't think retarded.
do you have any idea of freaking slow USB transfer is off a canon rebel xti? let alone any other model of camera?
lets see your "USB" port outperform my SDHC reader in my Asus laptop when taking pictures off a camera
not everyone has the luxury of dicking around waiting for 8GB transfers to happen.
And I know several musicians, with actual recording contracts, who laugh at those who suggest they use Macs with Logic Pro.
On every system I've run OS X and had it crash on, I've had Windows be 100% rock solid stable on the same system. No faulty hardware, just a faulty built-in OS.
Restarting 14 times a day? Hmm. Yeah, definitely an exaggeration.
Pulling directly off the card in Windows with any app in Windows takes well less than 1/4 of the time it takes to pull the pictures off the camera via USB using any method in OS X.
You conveniently left out (unless you didn't know) that the President of the United States is a Mac user and so is his whole family and is actively setting up the White House with Mac computers, he wants Windows out of the White House and congress due to security reasons.
"A PC is no bargain when it doesn't do what you want"
That's really funny. Because over 90% of the world uses Windows computers to get things done. Does nobody want that?
No wonder apple fanboys act the way they do, this guy does the same thing! lol
I am so tired of the gaming and car analogy comments.
Sure Honda builds ok cars, but I'd still rather have a BMW 750 or a Range Rover (yeah yeah say what you will). I love my Rover.
I guess some people who are confined to buying commodity goods, would always feel uneasy about those who buy higher-end goods.
I know he uses a Mac but it doesn't really have any bearing on the point I was arguing against. What machine you, or the President, or I choose shouldn't matter. If he used a PC I wouldn't think anything less of him. It's just a tool to get a job done.
I was arguing against this misguided notion that somehow the world is completely crazy when you step outside of Apple. Oh no, it's a RIM phone! Call Spock over, how do you get this to work? Hey, why not just use the iPhone instead? My granny uses it and it's cool! That type of thinking I just don't buy into.
You can't use the video card under OS X though. It defeats the purpose.Your logic is quite interesting. Nearly all gaming on the Mac is done under Windows. You can install a Windows-only graphics card in a Mac Pro and then use it when you boot into Windows. Is that surprising?
You can't use the video card under OS X though. It defeats the purpose.
Who would buy a Mac Pro just to run Windows?
Please tell me you've done some research into this.Nobody. There are, however, people who prefer OS X but use Windows strictly for gaming. Want to play a PC game? Log into Windows. Anything else? Log back into OS X.
Up to four PCIe graphics cards can be installed in the Mac Pro, correct? Why not keep one in for OS X and another for Windows gaming?
Please tell me you've done some research into this.
LOL is that a joke?
that just shows how underpar OSX is for scaleability.
with OSX is doesnt "JUST WORK"