Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
So no LLM SIRI from Apple itself
The company isn't capable of it
They wasted too much time doing dumb stuff like re-inventing the wheel with Swift and all of their system frameworks instead of working on more important things. They'll probably never be able to catch up.

I don't like this at all. Google is a tracking hound, and Apple should know better.
I believe it's a copy of Google's model running on Apple's own server hardware. Google's model is open source and free, I run it on a Windows box with a beefy graphics card using LMStudio.
 
That’s it then, Siri off.
My main use of Apple Intelligence has been writing tools.

If HomePods will become google ear then I’m unplugging them. 😤
 
I don't understand people sometimes. There is no using Gemini without Google getting some data in return. Unless Apple is cutting a pretty massive check for a version that runs exclusively on Apple private cloud compute.

What drives ML development is data so people expecting Google to not have access to the data you provide by using their product are living in lala land.
But it’s not going to be Gemini, it’s Siri/Apple Intelligence that’s using Google’s models instead of Apple’s. Apple is reportedly paying a billion dollars a year for this. It is going to run on Private Cloud Compute, not Google’s servers.

I don’t understand why people think this deal means that they’re just going to put Gemini on iPhones and call it Siri.
 
lol.. Google 1 billion dollar contract with apple is unlawful.. it's all good.... here's a 100 billion contract for ai.... that google pays apple.. That also includes search lol
 
Was hoping for OpenAI to win this somehow. I find ChatGPT to be far more context aware, across different chats. It also seems (or maybe I have just trained it better to) ask clarifying questions and state its assumptions, whereas Gemini just barrels forward with a confident answer even if it's wildly off.
 
The EU will force Apple to offer several LLMs to choose from just as they did with browsers, search engines, or app stores.
While that makes sense on the surface, the EU will likely run into a massive technical wall here. There is a fundamental difference between a 'surface-level' integration (like the current ChatGPT opt-in) and the core 'Apple Intelligence' architecture.

The core models are baked into the OS to handle private data retrieval (on-device processing, semantic indexing, etc.). That isn't something you can just 'swap' with a toggle without breaking how the entire OS communicates with itself. If Apple offers a choice screen, it will be for the external queries—similar to how you choose a default Search Engine in Safari—but the foundational system-level AI is an architectural fixture, not a modular app.
 
Because people have a huge emotional investment in Apple exceptionalism. Any suggestion that Apple has had to be pragmatic when solving a complex problem by partnering with other companies rattles that precious little construct.

Notice how the boilerplate response lately is always "well, Apple should do [x] themselves, then." Which is unmoored from the reality of how increasingly deep and wide challenges are solved. Apple gave Nü Siri the ol' college try. It went nowhere. If anything, they should've realized it was a lost cause far earlier.

More broadly, Apple in general lately waits far too long to abandon stupid or failed ideas. The advantage of their deep, deep pockets is not pouring endless money on go-nowhere efforts, but rather the freedom to walk away and use someone else's better ideas instead.
No, people are complaining because Google is the enemy of all human individuality.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: cateye and com.B
As long as I can keep it 100% disabled, idgaf
Today’s iPhones cannot be turned off, that choice was taken away from us.

Once Gemini is integrated into iOS the same thing may apply.

Those who assume they have full control over their iPhone are fantasizing.
 
Good to know. Waiting to see how Apple Intelligence will improve over the coming months. Expecting Apple to talk more on Siri/AI/Apple Intelligence at WWDC.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mganu
It still boggles my mind that Apple launched Siri in 2010, spent 15+ years baking it into iOS, and somehow ensured it remained completely pants.
 
1. it’s Siri/Apple Intelligence that’s using Google’s models instead of Apple’s.
Combined with...
2. Apple is reportedly paying a billion dollars a year for this.

I don’t understand why people think this deal means that they’re just going to put Gemini on iPhones and call it Siri.
Because the math doesn't make sense if you take #1 and #2 together. There is no way Google agrees to give Apple access to their model and its backing dataset for a mere $1B/year unless there are other benefits that Apple will provide in return. Either Apple are paying several (ie, hundreds) of times more than what is being reported, or Apple are providing something else to Google (and we know Google is interested in only one thing).
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrSnirf
• FFS Buy perplexity already‼️
Totally this. It's quite unlike Apple to not buy an LLM that is already established and instead partner with Google. I guess in their head its the same as having Google as the default search engine? (which it totally isn't!). I have an iPhone 13 mini, so I probably won't get it anyway, but I hope there is an option to just use good old dumb Siri (who straight out blanks you if it can't help), rather than a Gooogle AI verison.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.