With the crayon colours of both iOS 7 and the alleged new phones, it looks as though Apple is focussing on the prepubescent and adolescent markets.
I thought Apple does not need feedback? Apple knows better what we need. Jobs once quoted Henry Ford: If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses.Apple is intentionally leaking information to judge market reaction to their ideas. It is free and a great way of getting feedback.
I would actually prefer it if they started doing 3.5 again. I much prefer the iphone 4 size to the 5
I was hoping Apple wouldnt fall into the trap that all phones must have huge screens. I have friends/co-workers who have the SGS3 and SGS4 and those things are HUMUNGOUS!! Way too big. I think 4-4.25" is a great size for a phone. If fits in your hand and pockets comfortably, is easy to use, and still big enough to show you the proper information on the screen in an easy to read manner.
I dont know what I'll do if Apple goes to these huge sizes too. Guess I'd keep my iphone 5 until it absolutely quit working. No way I want a big phone.
Ultimately I think there are many factors that determine what phone someone chooses. My wife was die hard iPhone and looked at my skyrocket and said she would never get a phone that big. Famous last words. And with no commentary from me (we went in to get the iPhone 5 for her) she (on her own) picked up the HTC One X and really liked it. And even commented that the phone didn't feel big, heavy, etc. One use case doesn't = all. And I am not implying that at all. But it happens. And no - it wasn't because she couldn't afford an iPhone. Or was coerced by a salesman, and several other things some people on here like to assert.
If anything, I think a 4" and a 5.7" would make more sense.
4" for those who want a pocket sized, one handed use smartphone. This is the iPhone I would buy because I want something that easily slips in my trouser pocket and is unobtrusive.
5.7" for those who want a micro-tablet. This is the device you'd buy if you were more concerned with larger text and images. This would, I guess, be popular with women who carry handbags, for instance, and so don't need to worry about pocket friendliness.
I feel like anything in between would be a neither/nor device. Neither small enough to be pocket sized and one handed or large enough to enable anything more than you can do on a smaller device.
I thought Apple does not need feedback? Apple knows better what we need. Jobs once quoted Henry Ford: If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses.
4" is fine... 3.5" was better... anything over 4"+ and you will be having the Samsung & Android boys cheer.
It is not larger, it's just longer. Please save me the technicalities of what larger truly means to anyone that loves to argue the point.
Finally! Choice! I'd love a 5.7 screen, hardly use my smartphone for calling, it's my portable mini computer.
BTW if they wait until late 2014, their market share will drop even more. Get these larger iphones out later this year.
Bigger Screen
Better Battery Life
Ultra Thin Design
PICK 2![]()
Excellent news on screen size, I'd buy the 5.7" on launch.
And the pocket argument is BS. I have an ipad mini and that (barely) fits in my pocket. A 5.7" phone will be just fine.
These are my favorite kind of Apple rumor threads. All of the negative spin/disgust/hate for Samsung's bigger screens get to show here because this is one of the earliest, more tangible rumors about iPhone meaningfully jacking up the screen size. Generally, you'll get the sentiment: some interested/excited but most beating it down as stupid, never happen, and so on. It seems it's hard to go from having to beat down every "I like Samsung's/HTC/etc bigger screens" comments to embracing a rumor of bigger screens in an Apple iPhone.
What usually happens? If the rumor pops up a few more times and gains strength, the sentiment starts getting hedged, meaning those so passionate about the stupidity, etc of this rumor starts moving toward the middle just in case it happens.
Then, if it does happen- if Apple rolls out larger screens- some of these very same people so passionately against the idea now will be gushing about the "best iPhones ever", "shut up and take my money" and so on. Samsung/HTC, etc bigger screens iPhones will still be "useless", "stupid", "ripoffs" but one of the big arguments against them will no longer be that they are "way too big", "who wants a phablet", etc.
Much dead-horse beatings such as pocketablity ("I want a phone that fits in my pocket"), one-hand utility ("I want to be able to touch any part of the screen with one hand") and so on will just evaporate if Apple rolls out direct competitor bigger-screen phones. Recall how similarly (negative) passionate some were when the early rumors of the iPhone longer-but-not-wider screen starting coming out. Here we go again.
Personally, given the relatively huge successes Samsung and others are having with screens bigger than 4 inches, I think it makes perfect sense for Apple to go there. Just because Apple didn't do it first doesn't mean they can't roll with what a good chunk of the market actually wants. This is Apple; it is what they do: they spin competitor differences as negative right up until Apple adopts whatever it is themselves and then it's the "best thing ever" (look up Apple flip flipflops for many such examples: remember "who want's video on an iPod?" and a whole host of others).
In my own case, my hands are way too big for the iPhone screens to date (and my pockets are plenty big enough for a screen with a diagonal measurement increase of upwards of even 2 inches). I'd love to see such options from Apple. Those happy with 3.5 or 4 shouldn't have the bigger screens forced upon them, but those hungry for bigger screens while sticking with the rest of the Apple benefits can get what they want too. Everyone involved can win with such options.