I dont really agree with you, but they are much more valid concerns as to why Apple could fail than their SJW stance on things.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple Debuts Limited Edition Mickey Mouse Beats Solo 3 Wireless Headphones Created in Collaboration With Disney
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
I dont really agree with you, but they are much more valid concerns as to why Apple could fail than their SJW stance on things.
Companies won’t let you discuss politics at work?
What the heck are you talking about?
Oh for sure. Apple's disingenuousness about . . . well, pretty much most things is laughable. The fact that people defend them or buy into the BS marketing speak they spew is strange.
Apple is a multinational corporation whose goal is to maximise shareholder profit. They do that buy making overpriced widgets that they have marketed very, very well. Their goal isn't to improve your life or relationships or help the planet. "Apple" is not creative. If some of those things happen as a side effect of them making vast sums of money, well, they can leverage that to sell us more crap.
I love my MBP, but it is just a computer.
Apple is a multinational corporation whose goal is to maximise shareholder profit. They do that buy making overpriced widgets that they have marketed very, very well. Their goal isn't to improve your life or relationships or help the planet. "Apple" is not creative. If some of those things happen as a side effect of them making vast sums of money, well, they can leverage that to sell us more crap.
I love my MBP, but it is just a computer.
I literally laughed out loud reading your comment.
They are absolutely ugly.
[doublepost=1539933990][/doublepost]Maybe had they designed them better, people might buy them. It literally looks like they took some mickey mouse stickers and put them on some grey beats.
People will buy them. Just because you and I don’t like the design doesn’t mean people won’t buy them.
Not to sound curt, but have you had a "real" job before? discussing politics is typically against company policy.
My professional real job in financial services has no such policy.
However, it's common sense to use candor around such discussions. I wouldn't discuss politics in front of customers, I wouldn't get into real debates with others at work, etc. But my immediate seating area of 5-6 coworkers all feel the same way. So we can talk openly as we see fit unless there are outsiders around, then we do reign it in on our own.
Mid range sucks, depth of sound sucks, otherwise, they may be the best at whatever price point. I don’t compromise on sound, on budget: yes.
The B&O Beosound H7 is the reference, whatever your dimishing post is trying to approve.
Let me sound provocative and surprising as you apparently seem to be triggered by: I love the Beats X, and can really recommend them. It’s a good product for its price, and has a nice auditive spectrum, good bass. Downside is the wireless phone application is not all that impressive, but heck... to complain about that might be a little too provocative.
[doublepost=1540496802][/doublepost]
Besides: nothing audio is ever objective.
Besides the besides:
My subjective statement on these is not so provocative as the different reviews one may find on the net.
Google for reviews and read a few of them, and you will not find bad reviews for the overall product, but you will find pretty many reviews that mention the sound being not so impressive.
The sound is the most important for me, maybe not for others, and it is the only thing I said: the sound sucks, if you know how things CAN sound...
If you compare to the earpods, sure...
Let me provoke a little more:
These ear phones are extremely comfy, good looking and have excellent Bluetooth pairing. Just sad that ... the sound is not on par.
Sigh...
You're wrong, and you couldn't demonstrate it even more than you just did if you tried.
https://www.innerfidelity.com/content/time-rethink-beats-solo2-excellent-measurements-page-2
There's the measurements, so go ahead and argue with what the science of it actually is - something that has no bias and cannot lie. Then get your ears checked.
As for your statement. They are not in line with any review you'll find on the net, and haven't been in line with any review you'd find on the net since the Solo 2 came out in 2014, which is what I said. You'll only find baseless comments like yours making statements based on the headphones Monster released under this brand name, not of any recent product.
On your statement on the mid-range, the science proves you wrong... it has the most natural midrange and the best vocals in the 2-300 dollar range.
The Solo 2's were regarded as reference cans for mid-range on-ear sealed headphones. The B&O H7s are not anywhere on that map for upper-range on-ear sealed, lagging way behind Sennheiser Momentum, HD 25/26, Focal Spirit Pro's & Classics, Shure SRH, amongst others. There's a huge difference there.
What’s your point, really?
I at least express a personal opinion. These are my ears. I don’t give a flying fart about anything you throw at me, mister.
If you cannot live with that, well no worries for me, but spare me your BS.
People that read in a proper way, have no more potential irritation with my post, other than think: “well, that dude has his opinion. I got mine, or I haven’t.”
Just ignore me, man. Vomit on someone else, please.
Adios!
The point is, your comment is FOS. You never touched them, not a single time. You tried to sound edgy based on things you saw other people say on the interwebs, you admitted as much by telling me to "google it". Yet you were even wrong on that. You fell flat on your face. Run along now, you're dismissed.