Apple Denied Request to Ban Tax Protestors From Its Stores in France

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by MacRumors, Feb 23, 2018.

  1. MacRumors macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]


    The High Court of Paris on Friday denied Apple's request for an injunction that would have blocked activist group Attac from protesting at the company's retail stores across France, as it has been doing for the past several months.

    [​IMG]
    Attac activists protesting at an Apple Store in France via Libération

    The order states that the mere presence of protesters at Apple's stores in France, without violence, vandalism, or customers being blocked from entering the premises, is not enough to justify limiting the group's rights to freedom of expression and freedom of peaceful assembly protected by human rights laws in Europe.

    The court added that Attac acted in accordance with the European Union's Statutes of the Association, and defined the protests as a matter of public interest. Apple has been ordered to pay 2,000 euros to cover Attac's legal fees, according to the order, which was earlier reported by French website MacGeneration.

    Attac is a voluntary association that has been accusing Apple of corporate tax evasion in Europe, in line with the European Commission ordering Ireland to recover around 13 billion euros in back taxes from the iPhone maker in 2016. Apple and Ireland have denied the accusations and are appealing the decision.

    Apple previously said it has "a long tradition of supporting individuals and groups that peacefully express their opinions," but it accused Attac's activists of "vandalizing shops and endangering the security of staff and customers," which it finds unacceptable, according to court documents obtained by The Guardian.

    During a stunt at an Apple store in Aix-en-Provence last November, for example, activists painted "pay your taxes" on the glass windows. Attac also gathered in front of the High Court of Paris last week with Stormtrooper costumes and Star Wars-themed signs that equated Apple to the evil Galactic Empire.

    [​IMG]
    Apple CEO Tim Cook equated to Darth Sidious via Sol Trumbo Vila?

    Attac has a different view. In a blog post published today, the association said it is "defending the public interest" with "non-violent citizen actions," and it has previously called its actions "festive and good-natured."

    Apple has yet to comment on today's decision, and it's unclear if it will exercise other legal options in its fight against Attac.

    Note: Due to the political nature of the discussion regarding this topic, the discussion thread is located in our Politics, Religion, Social Issues forum. All forum members and site visitors are welcome to read and follow the thread, but posting is limited to forum members with at least 100 posts.

    Article Link: Apple Denied Request to Ban Tax Protestors From Its Stores in France
     
  2. RCS31, Feb 23, 2018
    Last edited: Feb 25, 2018

    RCS31 macrumors 6502

    RCS31

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2013
    Location:
    Looking for a place of freedom and rationality
    #2
    I'm all for freedom of speech and the right to protest but this is vandalism, I also find these protesters to be a bunch of moral high grounders. They don't know what's actually happening behind the scenes.
     
  3. justperry macrumors G3

    justperry

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2007
    Location:
    In the core of a black hole.
    #3
    Not relevant, fact is you have freedom of speech in Europe, glad the judge denied Apple's request.
     
  4. indychris macrumors 6502

    indychris

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2010
    Location:
    Fort Wayne, IN
    #4
    Hey, if Tim is going to continually play the moral protest game himself, then what's good for the goose...
     
  5. gaximus macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2011
    #5
    Wouldn't they just need to prove that their not "peaceful protests". Just need to get pictures or video of the vandalism
     
  6. dannyyankou macrumors 604

    dannyyankou

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2012
    #6
    I’m conflicted on this. I believe in free speech, but if these protesters are disrupting service and affecting sales, I feel like Apple has the right to tell them to leave.
     
  7. Noctilux.95 macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2010
    Location:
    LA
    #7
    Tim is very liberal when it comes to social freedoms but extremely right wing when it comes to protecting his money. Its nice to have it both ways, huh Tim?
     
  8. miniroll32 macrumors 65816

    miniroll32

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2010
    #8
    And Apple would never take the moral high ground, would they?
     
  9. SWC macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2004
    #9
    So in France its ok to vandalize private property as long as you claim that it is in peaceful protest. Got it.
     
  10. Orlandoech macrumors 68040

    Orlandoech

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2011
    Location:
    Salt Lake City, UT
    #10
    Couldn't agree more. It's pathetic. Anything to protect his $ and his shareholders, unless those views are in any way, shape, or form conservative.
     
  11. QCassidy352 macrumors G4

    QCassidy352

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2003
    Location:
    Bay Area
    #11
    It’s mind boggling to me that “freedom of speech” could be construed to allow a bunch of jackasses to disrupt business in a privately owned establishment. In the US, these morons would be facing trespassing and vandalism charges, and rightfully so.

    Edit: after rereading, it’s unclear to me whether they were in the stores or on the public sidewalk, which makes ALL the difference. If they were outside, then they’re fine. If inside, arrest ‘em. The vandalism is a crime either way.
     
  12. Saipher macrumors demi-god

    Saipher

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2014
    Location:
    CA
    #12
  13. justperry macrumors G3

    justperry

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2007
    Location:
    In the core of a black hole.
    #13
    So, if I understand correctly you find painting on a window "vandalising", guess what, you can wash that off in no time.
     
  14. wigby macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2007
    #14
    It's also pretty easy to get protesters to act violently when you physically remove them from a space.
    The problem Apple faces is that they also allow and encourage other forms of non-violent protest in their own stores (at least in the U.S. they have). So Apple wants to pick and choose their causes but that opens them up others to get into the door.
     
  15. dan9700 macrumors 68000

    dan9700

    Joined:
    May 28, 2015
    #15
    Activists are a cult that are a bunch of sheeps that just protest for the sake of it, morons
     
  16. AJ5790 macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2016
    Location:
    Phoenix
    #16
    You also have freedom to vandalize businesses?
     
  17. radiology macrumors 6502

    radiology

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2014
    Location:
    Westlake, OH
    #17
    Sweet! Freedom of speech prevailed! Isn’t Apple all about that these days?
     
  18. QCassidy352 macrumors G4

    QCassidy352

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2003
    Location:
    Bay Area
    #18
    No, actually, it doesn’t, at least under US law. In the US, a business (and any private entity) absolutely can engage in viewpoint discrimination. Perhaps France has some kind of “equal time” for private entities - I don’t know.
     
  19. Glmnet1 macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2017
    #19
    I'm pretty sure you would call it vandalizing if it was done on your windows, no matter how easy it is to wash it off.
     
  20. paulvee macrumors regular

    paulvee

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2003
    Location:
    NYC
    #20
    What a well-thought out, nuanced, intelligent statement.
     
  21. Gorms macrumors 6502

    Gorms

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2012
    Location:
    UK
    #21
    Mentioned this last time there was an article on it. You don't step on the French's right to protest. Mostly because it just won't work. You can take them to court and the judge will take one look at you, one look at the protesters, tear off his wig, tie you up, and start waving a placard too.

    It's a beautiful thing.
     
  22. bruinsrme macrumors 603

    bruinsrme

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2008
    #22
    I would imagine you would simply shrug it off, break out the cleaning goods you had to purchase and clean up someone else’s act against your property.
    Or would that be different
     
  23. AppleFan91 macrumors 65816

    AppleFan91

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2012
    Location:
    Indy, US
    #23
    Interesting. I know they’d lose in the US for writing on the windows. That’s considered vandalism. Easy to wash off? Sure, but it’s still vandalism
     
  24. tigres macrumors 68040

    tigres

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2007
    Location:
    Land of the Free-Waiting for Term Limits
    #24
    so they can legally paint on Apple's property?
     
  25. tkukoc macrumors 65816

    tkukoc

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2014
    Location:
    Wish I Was In Space!
    #25
    I'm all for free speech but painting stuff on someone's windows isn't ok. Do your speeches and chants, have signs but painting those signs on property you don't own.. ah that's craziness.

    Wonder how many of those people have Apple products on them or at home? lol
     

Share This Page