Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Same here, I have a 64GB CF in the wife's car and a 128GB SD in mine, both 5th gen Video, so much simpler than trying to connect my phone each time. Sometimes, I'll even take it out of the car and PLUG a set of headphones in and listen, give's you a certain nostalgic feeling, like listening to vinyl.

I take it with me when I'm walking now. I'm convinced the sound quality is better than the iPhones and I really love not being bothered by notifications all the time.

Plus I'm listening to music I haven't heard in a long long time!

It's fun again to listen to music.
 
Just a question to anyone saying they use the shuffle at the gym. Why not put music on your Apple Watch ? Which would in fact be better because it's wireless. This is probably why Apple is doing it as well.

There's a big price difference between a shuffle and an Apple Watch.

I dont own a shuffle but I know alot of people who loved it for gym workouts/runs because of the size, convenience, simplicity and low cost.

Alot of people still prefer wired headphones as well because of the simplicity (lack of charging, no turning on/off, pairing issues, etc) and the cost (sound quality wise you still get way more bang for your buck).

The shuffle was the ultimate workout music player because of all those reasons. You could clip it virtually anywhere on your outfit and forget about it because of its' size and they only cost $49 to replace.

Never owned one but I always saw the specific value of it and definitely see how a certain group of people could be very disappointed by this.
 
Last edited:
I have many fond memories buying my first iPod. It was a 2006 silver 2nd gen iPod shuffle with 1gb of storage. I payed around 60 dollars for it and I was in 2nd grade. I am surprised the shuffle lasted as long as it did before discontinuation. In fitness scenarios the Apple Watch has essentially replaced the Suffle and Nano in terms of portability.
 
Ignorance is becoming of you for labeling the Apple Watch a "Dud", when it Clearly isn't. But you likely already knew that when you interjected a snark comment about Cook into the equation.

Edit: A quick glance at Your previous posts also disparages against Cook as well. So, it's not just about the Apple Watch, you're just using this as leverage.

Not leverage. The watch is invisible in the real. The discontinued iPods were useful to many.

Comment about Cook is not snark. Apple lacks innovation. Popular items are discontinued in an attempt to force sales of things that people may not be as enthusiastic about. If you like the watch that's good. Others like something different.

Killing off the MBA 11 was obviously an attempt to force sales of the portless MB with the weird keyboard. Buy all that if you like it.

BTW watchbands are not innovation.
 
I still have my 2GB 2nd Gen Shuffle. Don't use it much anymore, but I will keep it for posterity as it was the very first Apple ANYTHING I ever bought. As an 18-year Microsoft stack software developer, I was very much anti-Apple in my earlier years... but I was curious enough to try the Shuffle out, which I bought for $35 used on eBay over 10 years ago. That turned out to be the "gateway drug"; which also led me to buy a 4th-Gen Nano, and then eventually, an iPhone 4 in 2010.

Today I have an iPhone 7 (256gb), an iPad Air 2 (128gb), a 4th-Gen Apple TV (64gb) and an Apple Watch Series 2.

All because of the iPod Shuffle.
 
Just a matter of time I suppose.

I find it more troublesome that yet again this fits into a longer trend - that of Apple emphasizing the profit margins by jacking up the average selling price by any and all means possible. The thinking seems to be "Why sell 49$ iPods when we can sell 199$ iPods?" Or "Why sell 499$ Minis when we can sell 4999$ iMac Pros?"

Apple of the early 00's was far more of a reasonably priced premium than a luxury brand. Now, a decade later with nMP, the Watch Editions and the projected pricing of the upcoming iPhone 8, there's very little doubt that the company is aiming to be just the latter.

End of an era, in more ways than just one.
 
I still remember saving my money from my first job and buying a shuffle. My first ever Apple product, has a tiny 1GB.

Still have it in the box, with all the stuff.

Used the hell out of it until I was given an iPod nano years later (still have in the box).
 
  • Like
Reactions: dan110 and SusanK
Fudge. I bought a Nano last year to replace my old one that died for running. Now I'm going to buy an extra iPod or two because there isn't really another compact, high quality, reliable, music player in the market.
 
About time. Apple Watch made both redundant, and entry point for Sport is low enough that why would you need the dedicated player - especially if you use it for fitness.
 
STEVE JOBS IS ROLLING IN HIS GRAVE!!!!!!







Apple today removed the iPod nano and iPod shuffle from its website and online store around the world, and it has since confirmed the iconic portable media players have been discontinued. Apple continues to sell the iPod touch with updated pricing and storage, including a 32GB model for $199 and 128GB model for $299.

ipod-nano-generations-800x486.jpg

For now, it appears the iPod nano and iPod shuffle are still available to purchase at many Apple Stores and other resellers, but that likely won't be the case for too much longer. In the United States, the latest iPod nano started at $149 with 16GB of storage, while the iPod shuffle cost $49 with 2GB of storage.

Beyond new colors and storage capacities, Apple had last updated the iPod nano in October 2012 and the iPod shuffle in September 2010. Apple last updated the iPod touch in July 2015 with an A8 chip and an 8-megapixel rear camera.

Apple introduced the iPod shuffle in January 2005, followed by the iPod nano in September 2005. In total, there were seven generations of the iPod nano, and four generations of the iPod shuffle.

ipod-shuffle-generations-800x442.jpg

iPod sales had been declining for several years. Apple reported 2.6 million iPods sold in the fourth quarter of 2014. Since then, Apple has grouped iPod sales under its "Other Products" category in earnings results. iPod sales peaked at 54.8 million in 2008, compared to 14.3 million in 2014.

The success of the iPod, first introduced in 2001 by the late Steve Jobs, helped Apple reestablish itself as one of the world's most successful technology companies at the turn of the millenium. But, after the iPhone launched in 2007, the iPod nano and iPod shuffle became increasingly niche products.

Update: "Today, we are simplifying our iPod lineup with two models of iPod touch, now with double the capacity starting at just $199, and we are discontinuing the iPod shuffle and iPod nano," an Apple spokesperson told Business Insider.

Article Link: Apple Discontinues iPod Nano and iPod Shuffle
 
Just a question to anyone saying they use the shuffle at the gym. Why not put music on your Apple Watch ? Which would in fact be better because it's wireless. This is probably why Apple is doing it as well.
I really don't like any wireless headphones I've ever tried. I have very old school wired "on the ear" (not in ear, not over the ear) super lightweight headphones. iPod+headphones+cable all clip nicely on my hat, so I just put my hat on at start of run. If I ever find wireless headphones that aren't in ear and feel good, then I'll start using my Apple Watch for music while running. iPod Shuffle stays charged for two weeks or more (five hours running/week). Love that.

Someday when wireless gets more variety, better battery.
 
That's a real shame. Have just ordered another nano as a spare, they're really convenient for running and I'm not convinced the Apple Watch has enough battery to drive Bluetooth and GPS for the distance
 
The iPod Nano was my first Apple product. Until I saw this article I had forgotten Apple even still sold them.
 
Last edited:
Good on Apple for continuing to clean up the product lineups. Now all they need to do is rebrand the iPod Touch to simply iPod the next time they refresh it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dan110
The first-generation iPod changed my life — literally.

I bought one in 2004 specifically so I could also buy the newly introduced Nike+iPod Sports Kit. I had gained too much weight in the previous couple of years, and wanted some motivation to get moving again.

That little combo did just the trick. Within two years, I had logged 5,000 Nike+ miles and shed 10 kilograms. I haven't looked back since, and continue to use the Nike+ system daily.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.