why onot buy 5k imac?
Because it does not have a matte screen for photo editing without reflections!
why onot buy 5k imac?
I wonder what this means for the ones in the Apple stores... Will they be displaying these 'great third party displays'?
Great for laptops with those dinky screens, and you get a recharge at the same time.While sad, it makes a great deal of sense. Only Mac mini and Mac Pro need to be connected to the display (unless they run headless).
Okay. So this is the direction Apple is taking.
Unless Apple exceeds my expectations with the MacBook Pro refresh, I'm done with this company. There's nothing for me here anymore.
If only you could use it as a monitor, i.e. without the crappy mobile iMac computing parts.To be fair, the 27 inch 5k iMac is cheaper than some standalone 5k monitors.
Yeah, it was only worth it when it had just come out, maybe for a few years after. It's ancient now.In Australia,
A$1,600 - Apple Thunderbolt Display (27-inch) [1440p]
A$569 - BenQ GW2765HT 27in 2K IPS Monitor [1440p]
A$1,139 - LG 34UC87C 34in Curved UltraWide IPS Monitor [10-bit 3440 x 1440]
A$320 - OWC 12 Port Thunderbolt 2 Dock
The Thunderbolt Display likely has higher build quality, but I could buy 2x BenQ (+ Dock) or a 34" LG (+ Dock) and have $150 to spare. It's hard to justify a $700 Apple Tax with little incentive (it's not like I need to buy an Apple Display to use macOS).
No. They will be replaced with "The new watch bands".I wonder what this means for the ones in the Apple stores... Will they be displaying these 'great third party displays'?
What do USB ports on a monitor do? I'm not sure what function they serve.Not by a long shot. 2560x1440 110ppi display for $1000 in 2016? USB 2 ports?
My $500 Dell P2715Q blows it out of the water, is matte, 4K, IPS, 3X USB 3.0 ports, identified by macs as a Retina display with multiple scaling options and is an absolute dream to look at/edit video on. I'm sure anyone with $1000 could do even better than me, but I opted for two of these Dells to go with a custom built 12 core Haswell-E/980Ti hackintosh because I simply couldn't push myself to buy a 2013 Mac Pro with worse video and CPU for more money. I'll pay the apple tax all day, but for frick's sake at least keep the hardware current so I don't feel totally jipped.
Their official statement really leads me to believe they're just going to straight up not make a standalone display anymore, though.
I have a use Thunderbolt Display with rMBP. While very convenient, TD not being retina often makes me use smaller 15" screen. And it's also a shame that its connectivity is so outdated and power/Thunderbolt cable is not detachable (mine is fraying).Great for laptops with those dinky screens, and you get a recharge at the same time.
I cannot imagine anyone buying this for the last two to three years. I mean, it is 2011 tech costing one grand ...
Apple today told several news sites that it plans to discontinue its Thunderbolt Display, which has been available for purchase online and in Apple retail stores since it was first introduced in the summer of 2011.
Apple will continue to sell existing Thunderbolt Display stock so long as it remains available, but once stock is exhausted, the Thunderbolt Display will no longer be available as production is ceasing. It is not clear why Apple has decided to make an announcement concerning the discontinuation of the display and if it means a new 4K or 5K display is on the horizon.![]()
Stock shortages ahead of WWDC sparked rumors that Apple might be planning to introduce a new display at the event, but no new hardware appeared and Apple instead focused on software for iOS devices, Macs, Apple TVs, and Apple Watch devices.
Rumors have suggested Apple is working on a 5K display, and if true, such a display could feature a resolution of 5120 x 2880 pixels, USB-C/Thunderbolt 3 peripherals, and a design that mimics the latest iMacs. Speculation suggests it could come equipped with a built-in GPU or use a DisplayPort 1.2 Multi-Stream Transport setup to stitch two halves of a display together to make one seamless display.
If a new Thunderbolt Display is in the works, it could launch alongside next-generation Skylake Retina MacBook Pros, which are rumored to be in the works for late fall.
Article Link: Apple Discontinues Thunderbolt Display
Not by a long shot. 2560x1440 110ppi display for $1000 in 2016? USB 2 ports?
My $500 Dell P2715Q blows it out of the water, is matte, 4K, IPS, 3X USB 3.0 ports, identified by macs as a Retina display with multiple scaling options and is an absolute dream to look at/edit video on. I'm sure anyone with $1000 could do even better than me, but I opted for two of these Dells to go with a custom built 12 core Haswell-E/980Ti hackintosh because I simply couldn't push myself to buy a 2013 Mac Pro with worse video and CPU for more money. I'll pay the apple tax all day, but for frick's sake at least keep the hardware current so I don't feel totally jipped.
Their official statement really leads me to believe they're just going to straight up not make a standalone display anymore, though.