Not really, despite what people here claim, there are plenty of suppliers out there that can match Samsung's quality. The quality Apple demands will be the same and has likely already been assured for anything they are removing from Samsung, the LG problem was an anomaly it was not based on leaving Samsung, it was needing more supply in a hurry.
You really have not paid much attention to anything. These changes have been going on for well over a year.
Apple's $7.3b in profit is more than twice Samsung's $2.6b in profit last quarter. Profit is considerably more important than revenue. Particularly when we are discussing the ability of a company to react to change. If you want to look at trends. Apple set a record last quarter and Samsung profits have declined for at least the past two.
How terribly they must be run to have a large financial services component and tiny little profits. What point were you attempting to make?
So Samsung is a terribly inefficient company. I get it. Most conglomerates end up being terrible investments. The profitable pieces are just drug down by the trash. Think about it for a minute. Apple made twice the profit on 7% of the revenue...
While you just called nearly everyone else on the forum delusional, you seem to be the one with blinders on. Apple can have any supplier they want. They are the biggest customer in the world for all of these components. If you believe losing them will have no impact, you are well beyond delusional.
