Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Is it just water in liquid cooling or are there any sort of chemicals involved? If so I guess that’s the reason. Apple is obsessed with the enjoyment - for which I’m glad.
Often water, though there are exotic systems that use different kinds of compressible fluids or even aerosols.
 
This is awesome, if I lived in the Northeast. I could warm my apartment just from running an Mac Pro.;)

Not so great down South where it's hotter than the devil's butt crack. Well, that's an issue with all computers that uses top of the line processors, not just Mac's. I hope I don't need to have a dedicated AC just to use a Mac Pro during the 100 degree summers here.
 
The outside cutouts and inside cutouts are symmetric. If you look directly behind it the way it’s turned won’t make a difference as far as the cutouts go. Apple has a switch that allows it to rotate 90 degrees. I see the way it vents won’t make any lick of difference. But they look the same turned as they do horizontal.
We are talking about the internal cooling fins, not the holes in the back.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cmaier
The outside cutouts and inside cutouts are symmetric. If you look directly behind it the way it’s turned won’t make a difference as far as the cutouts go. Apple has a switch that allows it to rotate 90 degrees. I see the way it vents won’t make any lick of difference. But they look the same turned as they do horizontal.

the fins are different than the cutouts. Fins run in parallel and air is channeled through them, hopefully in a turbulent manner. Heat from the components under the fins radiates into the fins and is carried away by the airflow.
 
With the amount of emphasis and design philosophy structured towards avoiding LOUD NOISE at all cost...couldn't Apple have went towards liquid cooling? I'll never understand Apple's love for silence at the cost of adequate/bad cooling in all of their machines.

They’ve dove liquid cooled in the past. One model of the Power Mac G5. Would imagine it was a service nightmare due to the chemical used for it. There’s a video of a vintage Mac collector who received one, it was damaged in shipping and broke the pipe. Bricked the entire Mac.
 
Initial reports from the youtube influencers who received mac pro's from Apple said it was quiet. BUT... what was their ambient room temperature? How does the mac pro and the monitor perform when ambient temperature is 35C? I'm sure 4 fans will cool it adequately but it won't be quiet.

you can afford a Mac Pro but not an air conditioner?
 
Lots of weird concerns about dust - do y'all not have basic filtration on your HVAC systems at home/work? How disgusting are your workstations? Use a feather duster once a month.

Dust will still exist regardless of your HVAC situation at home / office.

Dust is perfectly natural and normal accumulation of micro particles. While your home HVAC will do a good job at reducing a lot of the airborne dust, it can never be 100%.

A computer, with constant airflow will be a natural vacuum to suck up dust particles that we all shed off constantly (a lot of dust is just skin particles that we shed). unless you have a clean room that has the proper setup to eliminate dust, you will always have dust.

And computers, as I said with the fans always going act almost like a vacuum in that it will suck in anything in the air around the workstation. Dust included.

The thing that is oddly questionable is why there is no dust filter on the front intake. if the air flow is properly balanced (which I would imagine so), than a single dust filter would legitimately reduce the potential dust intake by leaps and bounds.

However, lack of dust filters is a common theme in a lot of cases. this isn't something that Apple's exclusively missed. When shopping for cases, it's often an additional featureset that one has to look out for.
 
They’ve dove liquid cooled in the past. One model of the Power Mac G5. Would imagine it was a service nightmare due to the chemical used for it. There’s a video of a vintage Mac collector who received one, it was damaged in shipping and broke the pipe. Bricked the entire Mac.

At exponential technology we would test our chips (PowerPC) in macs with added liquid cooling (Allowing us to overclock, etc). I seem to recall that the liquid cooling caused lots of problems and had to be babysat quite a bit.
 
At exponential technology we would test our chips (PowerPC) in macs with added liquid cooling (Allowing us to overclock, etc). I seem to recall that the liquid cooling caused lots of problems and had to be babysat quite a bit.

not really true with modern liquid cooling. Especially the All in Ones. They are fairly plug in and forget. no maintenance required.

They however, do have a shelf life and will need to be fully replaced once they loose their efficacy.

No real babysitting needed with modern coolers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nickgovier
The low noise levels are going to make it so much better for my home theatre computer.
Go with the 58 core model, it will handle Netflix at 8K and stream some tunes to another room without buffer issues. ;)
 
Given the cost to develop the Pro Line, I wonder how profitable it is; as the sales price is prohibitive for most prosumers. At half-price; it would be something that the "average" (imho) prosumer would consider. But, unless you make a bit more than the average engineer/programmer - I just can't imagine dropping that kind of coin.

Bottom line: Does Apple realize a Net Profit off this line?
Probably. But it wouldn’t at half price.

The average prosumer buys MacBook Pro, iMac, iMac Pro or mini. Ten years ago they had to buy a Mac Pro to get the performance they need. Now they don’t.

In fact, even many pros don’t need Mac Pro anymore. They buy MBP, iMac, iMac Pro or mini. Few need Xeon tower workstations anymore, but those who do now have the choice again.
 
  • Love
Reactions: Alan Wynn
With the amount of emphasis and design philosophy structured towards avoiding LOUD NOISE at all cost...couldn't Apple have went towards liquid cooling? I'll never understand Apple's love for silence at the cost of adequate/bad cooling in all of their machines.a

They already tried that in PowerMac G5.
And you do remember this Mac Pro 2019 has totally no internal cable at all right? Everything including power is carried by PCBs. So a ugly tube is 100% not in this picture.

And almost all rack mounted servers are using this kind of air cooling system.

PS: water cooling is still air cooled by fans. Water can not cool your system. It just transfer heat faster in longer distance so you don't have to put large heatsink just on top of your heat generate components.
 
The lowest end Mac Pro is ridiculously priced in comparison to equally performant computers you can build today

However, once you start scaling into the upper configurations, that margin does decrease.

I believe it's related to the motherboard they've designed here. Probably costs a ridiculous amount for the lower volume of sales that are expected for this device.

That means that on the low end side of performance tier, that motherboard is likely a massive bulk of the actual costs as a percentage. But as you upgrade, that cost stays the same while the other components make up larger percentage of the price tag.

I haven't yet done a full blown comparison of all the Mac Pro sku's and what you could buy similarly, but I'd wager the point that this actually is in line is about midway up the upgrade path.

The aluminium casing is not cheap either, I bet it's also quite more expensive to make than most think it is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: buckwheet
most of the article from Apple is pure marketing spin. They do this a lot when they use standard tech from other companies.

I still remember when Ive was talking about the Apple watch's display. He did everything he could to resist calling it OLED display. He used a lot of words to describe the process of OLED display and that Apple was now using a new screen type they've never used before, and it was completely innovative.

A lot of Apple's mareting over it's life has been to differentiate itself from it's competition. Somehow "better". Just calling it the same thing as everyone else doesn't help that.
I mean, yes, but you just described marketing departments in general. I didn't read the article directly, but from what was quoted here it sounded like, at the very least, the engineers were basically just saying "we designed these fans from scratch for this application, and we used industry-accepted 'best' techniques to make them as good as they could be."

But I can totally buy the rest of the article being marketing spin, because that's what marketing departments do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LordVic
The aluminium casing is not cheap either, I bet it's also quite more expensive to make than most think it is.

yeah, that case looks serious.

There's been a copy already that mimmicks the look of the case (even down to the round bits, Love the round bits)

But it definitely looks like a ridiculously cheap knockoff from a quality perspective. I'd be damn willing to pay a good $300-$400 for the case if it were sold on it's own. And that's not terribly unreasonable for the pricing of some ATX cases these days.

Heck, there are PC cases now that cost a good $600+ on their own. Like look at this beast: https://www.newegg.com/black-deepcool-gamer-storm-e-atx-mid-tower-chassis/p/N82E16811853057
 
  • Like
Reactions: FairlyKors
Dust will still exist regardless of your HVAC situation at home / office.

Dust is perfectly natural and normal accumulation of micro particles. While your home HVAC will do a good job at reducing a lot of the airborne dust, it can never be 100%.

A computer, with constant airflow will be a natural vacuum to suck up dust particles that we all shed off constantly (a lot of dust is just skin particles that we shed). unless you have a clean room that has the proper setup to eliminate dust, you will always have dust.

And computers, as I said with the fans always going act almost like a vacuum in that it will suck in anything in the air around the workstation. Dust included.

The thing that is oddly questionable is why there is no dust filter on the front intake. if the air flow is properly balanced (which I would imagine so), than a single dust filter would legitimately reduce the potential dust intake by leaps and bounds.

However, lack of dust filters is a common theme in a lot of cases. this isn't something that Apple's exclusively missed. When shopping for cases, it's often an additional featureset that one has to look out for.
It's entirely possible that a dust filter fine enough to make a significant difference was actually causing noise or heat issues due to impeded airflow. And given the subject matter of this article they may very well have scrapped it in favor of a less restricted intake and a more "pleasing" noise.
 
  • Like
Reactions: chabig
I mean, yes, but you just described marketing departments in general. I didn't read the article directly, but from what was quoted here it sounded like, at the very least, the engineers were basically just saying "we designed these fans from scratch for this application, and we used industry-accepted 'best' techniques to make them as good as they could be."

But I can totally buy the rest of the article being marketing spin, because that's what marketing departments do.

yes, I know I was pointing out what should generally be obvious

Unfortunately, been here long enough to know that what we believe should be obvious, gets repeated over and over again by those who actually take the words on face value without questioning the motive.

sometimes, we need to point out the obvious :p
[automerge]1576168117[/automerge]
It's entirely possible that a dust filter fine enough to make a significant difference was actually causing noise or heat issues due to impeded airflow. And given the subject matter of this article they may very well have scrapped it in favor of a less restricted intake and a more "pleasing" noise.

Could be. Can't judge cause they don't have one available.

a dust filter is an absolutely nice to have. But not a requirement if you maintain your workspace and clean out your computer regularly enough.

my current build doesn't have one. it has not posed a problem because once every few months you open it. take a can of air and clean it. 5 minute job at most. And judging by how ridiculous easy it is to get inside the new case, with how much space is inside it. Cleaning it should be routine and very easy.
 
The article states: "According to Apple, the reworked "cheese grater" look achieves around 20 percent more airflow compared to the Power Mac G5 that preceded it"

I'm confused, or am I reading that wrong? The cheese grater style system that directly preceded this was an intel xeon system, released in 2012. Not the G5.

Well, but the case for the Intel was the same as the G5. So design-wise, it is the precedent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: autrefois
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.