This design is over 15 years old and still looks better...
![]()
I got a 2010 one - then handles are a tragically bad piece of design.
This design is over 15 years old and still looks better...
![]()
Nooo - its a pro workstation. It needs XLR connectors - or 1/4 inch jacks (balanced - one per channel) at the least! And a 3.5"... no! 5.25" drive bay (not for a drive - for the audio breakout box!)
(NB: semi-joking please don't reply too seriously).
hehe … as long as they're Neutrix gold!
Special effects are the practical effects shot on set.
If it's in a rack, you're not going to open up the side very easily. Not sure what's so tough about moving it out from under a desk. I used to do that anyway on the side-door G4's. Not good to service a computer w/ all the cords plugged in.
Rack rails let the computer slide forward out of the rack. That's how all rack servers are built. There's nothing bad servicing a computer if you unplug it. Look at any enterprise computer, like Dell Optiplexes and HP Elites. They all have big access handle on the side.
The handles work fine grabbing from the top. We have these at work.
The Apple handles are form over function.
If I read the news correctly, the new MacPro will come in a rack model but what we're seeing now is not that.
If you don't like it or can't afford it, don't buy it.
It still fits inside the section 179 amounts, so it's basically your_tax_bracket% off. But really, a Mac Mini with 32GB of RAM, a 512GB drive and an ultra wide monitor is more practical.
Just for reference, this is the sort of monitors the new Apple Pro Display XDR is set to compete with:
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/prod...m_318g_31_1_true_4k_monitor_4096x2160_10.html
They will sell these to entertainment studios mainly and these won't care about having to pay for a stand for $999, they will probably get the VESA adapter or maybe even get custom adapters to fit exactly what they need so the all outrage about the stand price is ridiculous when you put things in context.
It's like Sunday drivers feeking outraged at the price price of Formula 1 tyres as if they could use the Formula 1 to its full potential in the first place.
Section 179 cannot be used if your company is in the red, which is where this machine will put it.
The case is great (pun not intended) IMO, and if Apple ever makes it available for a consumer-level machine, I would be extremely happyWhen Apple finally delivered an actual pro machine for pro prices the people waiting for consumer grade parts in an expandable tower style consumer product were disappointed. Maybe, someday, this will happen. At least Apple finally acknowledges a tower or rack machine is necessary for some applications.
Nope, not with those ports on the front.
https://www.asus.com/ca-en/Monitors/ROG-SWIFT-PG27UQ/
Granted it's 4k @ 27 inches, it's basically the big daddy of all monitors... it's got everything, including 144hz refresh rate. For 2 grand, not 6.... WITH A STAND! LOL @ Apple
I want those optional wheels on mine, so I can roll it from room to room unless I decide to buy one for every room in my house.
Just for reference, this is the sort of monitors the new Apple Pro Display XDR is set to compete with:
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/prod...m_318g_31_1_true_4k_monitor_4096x2160_10.html
They will sell these to entertainment studios mainly and these won't care about having to pay for a stand for $999, they will probably get the VESA adapter or maybe even get custom adapters to fit exactly what they need so the all outrage about the stand price is ridiculous when you put things in context.
It's like Sunday drivers feeking outraged at the price price of Formula 1 tyres as if they could use the Formula 1 to its full potential in the first place.
Just for reference, this is the sort of monitors the new Apple Pro Display XDR is set to compete with:
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/prod...m_318g_31_1_true_4k_monitor_4096x2160_10.html
They will sell these to entertainment studios mainly and these won't care about having to pay for a stand for $999, they will probably get the VESA adapter or maybe even get custom adapters to fit exactly what they need so the all outrage about the stand price is ridiculous when you put things in context.
It's like Sunday drivers feeking outraged at the price price of Formula 1 tyres as if they could use the Formula 1 to its full potential in the first place.
And that, ladies and gentlemen, is what we call an opinion!This design is over 15 years old and still looks better...
Yup. And don't even get me started on the scale at which we buy workstations... However, no need to posture about such things. Intel reference, blah, blah. Yeah, the cheap clones do that. Apple, HP, sometimes Dell, and others engineer their own (based on Intel specs).
The proof is in reality. Go ahead, anyone, walk on over to Lenovo.com, or Dell.com, or HP.com and customize yourself a Xeon based workstation identical (or as close as possible) to the entry level new Mac Pro...
I did this yesterday at Hp.com (a Z4) - $7200. I just did it a few minutes ago at Lenovo.com (a P720) - $6360 (sans a few features that just aren't available from them, like 10gbe)... The reality is that capable workstations are expensive, and Apple now has a solid offering at an outstanding price point of $5999.
If you don't like it or can't afford it, don't buy it.
It still fits inside the section 179 amounts, so it's basically your_tax_bracket% off. But really, a Mac Mini with 32GB of RAM, a 512GB drive and an ultra wide monitor is more practical.
It's a very mediocre Pro machine. It's a one socket Intel Purley platform, which is about 2 years old now. It's equivalent to an HP Z6 G4, which Apple used as a comparison. However HPs are notoriously overpriced. You can get this same machine with an extra processor socket from Lenovo as a ThinkStation P920 with a starting price of $1279.
The huge thing though is all of the PC workstation manufacturers know many domains like scientific computing and machine learning need NVidia, not Apple's proprietary compute on mediocre AMD GPUs.
Unless you need MacOS for your pro application, PCs are simply more attractive.
This design is over 15 years old and still looks better...
![]()