Has anyone heard anything about a 10.5.5 release also coming Sept. 9? My guess is that iTunes 8 will require it. Of course that would leave the question of whether the new iTunes will run on Tiger.
Has anyone heard anything about a 10.5.5 release also coming Sept. 9? My guess is that iTunes 8 will require it. Of course that would leave the question of whether the new iTunes will run on Tiger.
itunes8 will be for all macs/windows machines.
I am 100% certain it will not run on my Powerbook 1400.
I am 100% certain it will not run on my Powerbook 1400.
Upgrade it with a G3 chip, use that hack that will let you run OS X, then run Tiger 10.4.11 and you be sure as daylight to be able to run iTunes 8 on your PB 1400.
depends on how fossil your laptop is. im sure it will, but very slowwwlly.
16 threads per Mac would come with the first Nehalems (4 cores/CPU, 8 threads/CPU, 2 CPUs/Mac).Yeah I really screwed that up, I guess I meant to say 16 threads? What I mean is double what there is now.
Help a brotha out.![]()
Just like how the iPod touch augmented the iPod lineup (not replace the iPod (classic)) and how the MacBook Air augmented the Mac lineup (not replace the MacBook), I think that any touchscreen/tablet Macs will start off as augmentations to the current lineup. Same with the tablet-inside-an-iMac mockup.I have to say that, if true, this kind of scares me more then excites me.
If Apple wants to launch a new line of portable products to augment their existing MacBook and MacBook Pro line (I can see the MBA going away), that is fine.
But if they're going to replace the existing MacBook and MacBook Pro line with this new product, while it might play well with well-heeled retail consumers, I expect it will not play well with corporate and many "corporate professionals" (people who use Macs to make a living).
Oh I see what happened there.:ost … ::
Is it just me, or is that some sort of effed up grammar? "iPhone mobile devices"? Iphonic mobile devices?Apple, which also makes iPhone mobile devices, e-mailed reporters an invitation […]
I see new MacBooks in either September 16 or September 23 dates.
you guys ever considered the WIDESCREEN of the event poster means "laptops?" cuz i know the ipod status bar and music and such, but the widescreen?
you guys ever considered the WIDESCREEN of the event poster means "laptops?" cuz i know the ipod status bar and music and such, but the widescreen?
It's possible that Apple has done so. They purposely let the aluminum keyboard pictures "get away" and also had fake iPhone prototypes.1) I find it bizarre that the whole events itinerary has essentially leaked. Since Im of the mind that Apple itself is behind most leaks, it seems odd that it would want to deflate the event...unless the leaks are distractions away from a more guarded unveil.
Add multitasking (even if only 1 app is visible at once) and iLife mobile, and you get a nice little device with multi-touch and without the hardware-intensive Mac OS X.Im beginning to see the market for the long-rumored device like the iPod touch, but 1.5 times bigger, with a 720 x 480 display. Its a long-shot, but Apple may want to capitalize on the popularity of netbooks, while think[ing] different[ly]. A 1.5 times bigger iPod touch, with iWork mobile, will be able to handle the web surfing and light productivity that netbooks are mainly used for, with the graceful aplomb that only Apple can provide.
Or in the SDK?Anyone unearth any new device codes in the iPhone OS 2.1 betas?![]()
But I'm expecting this device at MWSF 2009 or so, and if so, we'll start hearing some good rumors in Q4 2008.Mike Cane said:But if any of you are expecting the iPod Air to be leaked, dont hold your breath. Apple just extended the NDA on the iPhone OS SDK. That means any developer who leaks about upcoming device resolution independence features the key point that would reveal an iPod Air will be toast.
I find it bizarre that the whole events itinerary has essentially leaked.
I'd wager that the leaked dimensions of the iPod touch are accurate. Now, why would the new iPod touch be slightly thicker? I dont think larger capacities are the reason; a 64 GB iPod touch would be a little too pricy, in my opinion.
New features: GPS, speaker, two-megapixel camera
New prices
8 GB: $199
16 GB: $299
32 GB: $399
I think the iPod classic will offer more storage for the dollar:
120 GB: $249
250 GB: $349
Im beginning to see the market for the long-rumored device like the iPod touch, but 1.5 times bigger, with a 720 x 480 display. Its a long-shot, but Apple may want to capitalize on the popularity of netbooks, while think[ing] different[ly]. A 1.5 times bigger iPod touch, with iWork mobile, will be able to handle the web surfing and light productivity that netbooks are mainly used for, with the graceful aplomb that only Apple can provide. Anyone unearth any new device codes in the iPhone OS 2.1 betas?![]()
Add multitasking (even if only 1 app is visible at once) and iLife mobile, and you get a nice little device with multi-touch and without the hardware-intensive Mac OS X.
Nah, I can't say it's "possible". It's INEVITABLE Apple did this to hide another product.It's possible that Apple has done so.