Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
iCloud works great for me.

So 2011 was the last time they launched a successful service?
Or are you counting all the iterations it took them to get it to be reliable, fast and responsive?

Sidenote..
It is pretty funny how Steve used to say Dropbox was a "just feature, not a product" and didn't buy them.

And then Apple ended up going all in on iCloud and F-ed around for years and years to get it right and working even just "on par" with Dropbox.

Some would argue that even to this day Dropbox is still better.
 
Intense navel gazing. Lineup of politically correct, no violence, no cursing, bland video content. iPad and iPad mini speed bumps. New iPod. News subscription service

Colorful Spring watch band collection

Very exciting stuff. Apple is firing on all cylinders

Honestly, based on past events, this is EXACTLY what it will be. It’s kinda sad. Bland TV and weak upgrades.

We’ll have to wait for WWDC and September for the juicy announcements.
 
So 2011 was the last time they launched a successful service?
Or are you counting all the iterations it took them to get it to be reliable, fast and responsive?

Sidenote..
It is pretty funny how Steve used to say Dropbox was a "just feature, not a product" and didn't buy them.

And then Apple ended up going all in on iCloud and F-ed around for years and years to get it right and working even just "on par" with Dropbox.

Some would argue that even to this day Dropbox is still better.

Hmmm. Does Dropbox offer continuous and seamless backups of my iPhone? Does it offer all the Continuity features I get from Apple where I can move from device to device and continue what I was doing?

As to Apple services, what about Apple Music? I’d call that a highly successful service given how many users it has.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RandomDSdevel
Hmmm. Does Dropbox offer continuous and seamless backups of my iPhone? Does it offer all the Continuity features I get from Apple where I can move from device to device and continue what I was doing?

Very difficult to compare the two at this point, I agree.
For the core function of Dropbox I’d say people who prefer it have a point though.
[doublepost=1552448139][/doublepost]
As to Apple services, what about Apple Music? I’d call that a highly successful service given how many users it has.

Hard to say, at least to me

They have the natively integrated and default application advantages.

I’d imagine they are counting on those advantages to also translate to a news subscription.
We shall see on that ont.

I personally use local music and Pandora for streaming though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RandomDSdevel
Very difficult to compare the two at this point, I agree.
For the core function of Dropbox I’d say people who prefer it have a point though.
[doublepost=1552448139][/doublepost]

Hard to say, at least to me.
They have the natively integrated and default application advantages.

I personally use local music and Pandora for streaming though.

It’s not hard to say at all. Dropbox offers neither of those features (along with several others) so in that regard it’s useless compared to iCloud.

Whatever you use for music is irrelevant. Apple Music is a very successful service, which is what you asked for (any successful service Apple has launched).
 
It’s not hard to say at all. Dropbox offers neither of those features (along with several others) so in that regard it’s useless compared to iCloud.

It’s not useless to compare folder and file syncing, where they both compete and Dropbox is arguably better, faster and more reliable, informative and consistent - at least according to those who care about those features above all else.

I agree that iCloud attempts to do more.
The value of that is subjective and not necessarily of interest to all.
[doublepost=1552448500][/doublepost]
Whatever you use for music is irrelevant.

I was sharing what I use to indicate that I’m not a great person to comment on personal experience with Apple Music.

I was simply adding a data point and some clarity on my perspective.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RandomDSdevel
Hey Greymacuser, what's your hardware/os setup for your hackintosh? I looked into it a while ago and it seemed like a bit of a nightmare to get something running well!
I opted for the CustoMacPro option.
https://www.tonymacx86.com/buyersgu...ntosh-the-ultimate-buyers-guide/#CustoMac_Pro
If you do a 'vanilla install', it will be amazingly easy.
Best instruction guide out there-> https://hackintosh.gitbook.io/-r-hackintosh-vanilla-desktop-guide/
If you do the TonyMacX86 way, you'll be pulling your hair out. Vanilla is the cleanest, hassle free method of installation.
 
If you do the TonyMacX86 way, you'll be pulling your hair out. Vanilla is the cleanest, hassle free method of installation.

Just to mention it..

Not all the User Builds at Tonymacx86 actually use Unibeast/Multibeast (their tools).

The one I linked is one that didn't use Tonymac's Multibeast (which is where problems tend to occur).
Unibeast is a pretty handy and usually flawless USB install creator in my experience.

It's a great site mainly because so many people congregate there so lots of helpful forum posts and users are available to assist those trying to navigate any challenges.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RandomDSdevel
We? You can speak for yourself, I always look forward to these types of events, because generally, we really never know what to expect, and any hardware is merely a bonus for an event that may not necessarily be solely focused on hardware like the fall keynote is. Try staying open minded, that way you don’t set yourself up for disappointment for something that’s not guaranteed.

nice!
 
32GB isn't enough ram to comp 5K DPX frames in After Effects. (neither is 64GB really) My 2018 MBP is not PRO enough and the iMac is a stop gap. Where the HELL is the new MacPro?!?!
 
  • Like
Reactions: RandomDSdevel
Same here! I really wanted a new Mac Pro after owning a 2006 and 2009 Mac Pro but the processors and especially the GPUs in them were hot garbage. I can't believe that building your own computer for 1/4th the price would get you a better performing computer than a 'legit' Apple Mac computer.

The Hackintosh has easily been my favourite computer and one that's given me the most use. I've had it for 4 years now and I still don't have any plans to upgrade any time soon OTHER than the GPU (would love a GTX 1070 or something better, but my 980 is still more than adequate).

Same. I remember being so excited with each event announcement, can’t wait to watch.
Now you don’t expect to see anything interesting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RandomDSdevel
Best guess is the World Wide Developers Conference.

If it isn’t announced by the end of wwdc then I think that’ll be a serious indicator of where Apple stands on pro users. It was meant to be released last year but that never happened. At this point, if they are having issues with the design of the Mac Pro then they are massively over complicating something really simple.

Let’s face it, the older Mac Pro (not the cylinder one) was a masterpiece of design and surely would be a great starting point for a new design? All pro users want is the ability to upgrade and replace components over time (I’m not a pro so it doesn’t affect me, but it concerns me that pro users are being left in limbo)
 
s face it, the older Mac Pro (not the cylinder one) was a masterpiece of design and surely would be a great starting point for a new design? All pro users want is the ability to upgrade and replace components over time (I’m not a pro so it doesn’t affect me, but it concerns me that pro users are being left in limbo)
Problem is that's the exact opposite of what Apple wants. The new Mac Pro will be "modular" in the sense you buy priority "modules" from Apple. How does allowing a user to buy a graphics card off Amazon increase the average selling selling price (ASP) of that user? It doesn't therefore Apple will not allow it.
 
News and video streaming services that nobody cares about because they're just going to clone existing serrvices without adding anything new - brand and advertising cannot do everything, just look at Apple Music.

New Macs would be welcomed, but given Apple's distinct lack of interest in computers and the pro market as of late (and last year's insanely disappointing updates, and the total no-show of that promised Mac Pro we've heard mentions in the last 3 years), I wouldn't hold my breath.
 
Problem is that's the exact opposite of what Apple wants. The new Mac Pro will be "modular" in the sense you buy priority "modules" from Apple. How does allowing a user to buy a graphics card off Amazon increase the average selling selling price (ASP) of that user? It doesn't therefore Apple will not allow it.

I agree with you but it’s not necessarily the case. The situation with the older Mac Pro’s was that you generally ended up buying the upgrades from Apple. If they really want to lock you in then I’m sure they could use proprietary connections for each of the components forcing you to only buy from Apple. The problem with that is we end up back in the same position that the Mac Pro was in years ago... long waits for newer gfx cards etc
 
  • Like
Reactions: WatchFromAfar
News and video streaming services that nobody cares about because they're just going to clone existing serrvices without adding anything new - brand and advertising cannot do everything, just look at Apple Music.

New Macs would be welcomed, but given Apple's distinct lack of interest in computers and the pro market as of late (and last year's insanely disappointing updates, and the total no-show of that promised Mac Pro we've heard mentions in the last 3 years), I wouldn't hold my breath.

I quite like Apple Music but I have zero interest in the news or Netflix style tv service. I have Netflix and I’m happy with it.

I would love to see new macs that feel like proper workhorse computers but somehow I don’t know if that will happen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RandomDSdevel
"Apple is working on a $9.99 per month subscription news service that would give Apple News users unlimited access to stories from paywalled sites like The New York Times and the Washington Post."

Nope. Not one dime to either of those so-called "news organizations".

Whatever you think about the NYT and WaPo in particular (I would strongly disagree with your assessment of the former, at least), subscription based news services are a good thing for journalism.

If anyone has any doubt that the 'free' ad based model of news is pure cancer for democracies everywhere, just look at the clickbaity **** more and more news outlets put out.

Huffington Posts daily "Ten reasons why white people suck" or "men are garbage and here's why" clickbait article is guaranteed to be more lucrative than any detailed exposé of Trump's shady business dealings. Outrage sells ads, even if the content is lazy, vapid and repetitive.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.