Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster


Apple hardware engineering chief John Ternus and marketing chief Greg Joswiak recently did an interview with Tom's Guide, where they shared new insights into the MacBook Neo, AI, and spatial computing.


Ternus and Joswiak made it clear that the MacBook Neo isn't your average low-cost device. Apple doesn't typically put a lot of focus on its more affordable devices, but marketing for the Neo has been expansive, and that's because Apple sees it as a "reinvention" of the entry-level laptop. From Ternus:
I think maybe another one from our past is this idea that Steve talked about is the Mac being the bicycle for the mind, right? And you know, from the very beginning, the vision was let's make personal computing as accessible to as many people as possible. And that was the mission of the MacBook Neo.
Ternus said the MacBook Neo required "building something completely new from the ground up" to provide customers with quality at a low price. "We never want to ship junk," he said. "We want to ship great products that have that Apple experience."

Joswiak said the MacBook Neo's quality was important to Apple, and the Neo's build sets it apart from competitors.
You know the products in this space that it's competing against. They're plastic, they're little, you can flex them. They're so cheap, because what have they done? They just tried to cut a nickel, cut a quarter, cut a dollar out of everything to try to make it cheaper, and as a result, they made it cheap, which is very different than making it a lower price and high value, which was the approach we were taking.
Along with discussing the Neo, Ternus and Joswiak talked about the differences between the iPad and the Mac. Ternus said that Apple isn't going to merge the products, and similarities are because Apple focuses on what would make a device better and not on how one product might impact another.
We're going to make the best iPad we can possibly make. We're going to make the best Mac we can possibly make. Some customer is going to choose one, some customer is going to choose the other. A lot of customers actually like to have both, and that's great too. So yeah, we never think about... there's never been this idea of mashing these two things together.
On AI, which is an area where Apple has been struggling, Joswiak said it's not a sprint.
We've been doing things with intelligence for many years, right? And gen AI allows us an opportunity to do that even more. So I'm excited about that, but boy, this is not a sprint. This is a marathon, right? We're going to be doing stuff with intelligence for decades, not months or years.
Joswiak dodged a question about a potential touchscreen MacBook Pro, which Apple is rumored to be working on for launch as soon as this year. He also declined to comment on smart glasses, but said we're in the "early innings of spatial computing," while Ternus said that combining the digital and physical world is an "inevitability." The two were tight-lipped about any upcoming Apple products, but Joswiak said Apple is "working on some pretty cool stuff."

The full interview, which goes into more detail on the MacBook Neo, AI, and includes a Steve Jobs anecdote, is well worth watching.

Article Link: Apple Execs Say Spatial Computing Is 'Inevitable' and AI Is a 'Marathon, Not a Sprint'
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: Z-4195 and Starfia
I’m still thinking that MacBook Pro rumor is a larger screened iPad. Especially if it’s going to be the only device that ships with that new chip.
 
Real innovation is the profit we made along the way.

If you're an Apple shareholder, you should arguably be happy that Apple has not sent the bulk of said profit to NVIDIA.

You look at "cutting edge" AI companies like Anthropic losing a hundred-billion plus a year via "wealth transfer" to the GPU and server hardware companies and yet still do not have a viable business model for all that spend.
 
Trying to save face because they have failed to accomplish what other companies have done with regards to AI.

Edit to add: what was quoted would be more genuine and less save-face had they not gave in to FOMO and attempted badly at implementing "AI" features for the past two years.
 
Last edited:
If you're an Apple shareholder, you should arguably be happy that Apple has not sent the bulk of said profit to NVIDIA.
I am (via ETFs), but I’d gladly give up that profit for devices with improving rather than degrading usability.

You look at "cutting edge" AI companies like Anthropic losing a hundred-billion plus a year via "wealth transfer" to the GPU and server hardware companies and yet still do not have a viable business model for all that spend.
Anthropic currently has the problem that they don’t have enough compute to serve all the customers they have. Meaning they could up their prices if they wanted to.
 
Spatial computing might be the future, but AVP, or anything resembling it, won't be the device leading us there.
Considering how every current device, including devices that shipped years earlier are adopting a hand tracking option (for some reason, not a requirement until after AVP shipped) and a UI that looks more like what Apple has popularized (some even straight up copying Apple’s icons), it’s quite literally the device leading us there.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.