I like the island, how it works, and how it gives me info on multiple items at once - time counting down and music playing for example. I can see the potential.
Isn’t it just easier to say, we couldn’t fit all the sensors under screen, so until we do that this is the best?
Apple knows its users would never stop complaining about how the underscreen-camera image quality is worse and the array is not flawlessly hidden.
Which is why we have notches/cutouts instead.They’d be correct to complain.
Which is why we have notches/cutouts instead.
I meant the blacked out pixels in between the face id / front facing camera. I don't mine the cut outs and I thought the "i" looked better than the pill. Those extra pixels while DI is not in use should be turned on.Apple knows its users would never stop complaining about how the underscreen-camera image quality is worse and the array is not flawlessly hidden. #badcameragate #shimmergate #thehiddencamerasaredistractinggate
Like Android, while not being like Android. 😁Apple is masterful at milking a months-long PR campaign out of a single feature that solves a very first-world problem (having to switch apps for notifications on your iPhone).
Well, will it? I have no in-depth knowledge of how OLED works but here's what already was done: too many pixels get "sown together" into lesser-resolution images but with better colors and light sensitivity. "Virtual zoom" which is a seemless transition between physical cameras with different focal lengths. And for that matter - terrestrial optical telescopes which were so far greately limited by mostly atmospheric density related image skewing/disturbance are now compensated for this and reach levels ever closer to that of orbital telescopes. There is a whole bucket list of things "optically impossible" that are now solved via software and/or some sort of hardware assistance. To assume this task of under-screen camera is not solvable is somewhat akin to under-screen fingerprint sensors, way back in the day.Never, I hope. The camera getting worse isn’t something that excites me.
It doesn't affect videos for me because when the video fills the height there is no video content there. You would see it when scaling video to fit the width, but that crops off the top and bottom of the video so I never watch that way.I rarely even notice the notch on my 11 or 13 (so, I’m now about three years in). It’s a bit weird when watching a video / playing a game in landscape, but I rarely do that.
Well, will it? I have no in-depth knowledge of how OLED works but here's what already was done: too many pixels get "sown together" into lesser-resolution images but with better colors and light sensitivity. "Virtual zoom" which is a seemless transition between physical cameras with different focal lengths. And for that matter - terrestrial optical telescopes which were so far greately limited by mostly atmospheric density related image skewing/disturbance are now compensated for this and reach levels ever closer to that of orbital telescopes. There is a whole bucket list of things "optically impossible" that are now solved via software and/or some sort of hardware assistance. To assume this task of under-screen camera is not solvable
is somewhat akin to under-screen fingerprint sensors, way back in the day.
No reason for the iPad to get it since the bezels are large enough for the cameras and sensors. But imagine instead of putting the DI in the screen, there were small screens inside the bezel centers.Will this Dynamic Island come to the ipad as well? Or imagine a macbook with a dynamic island.
How about then I'll make the same statement and I've had every iPhone since the 3G. It's not worth the upgrade for a stupid pill thing and an upgraded camera.Because she is such an expert? Who cares.
I really don't see the point of implementing something like the Dynamic Island on a Mac environment.Coming to a Apple computer, in the future.
I agree.Well, will it? I have no in-depth knowledge of how OLED works but here's what already was done: too many pixels get "sown together" into lesser-resolution images but with better colors and light sensitivity. "Virtual zoom" which is a seemless transition between physical cameras with different focal lengths. And for that matter - terrestrial optical telescopes which were so far greately limited by mostly atmospheric density related image skewing/disturbance are now compensated for this and reach levels ever closer to that of orbital telescopes. There is a whole bucket list of things "optically impossible" that are now solved via software and/or some sort of hardware assistance. To assume this task of under-screen camera is not solvable is somewhat akin to under-screen fingerprint sensors, way back in the day.
It's a great solution to an issue that so many people have whined about. Sadly, I expect that will continue, though.
Seems many need a little bit of joy in their lives. Maybe the island can help a few out.
Last I checked there is still a big black blob(s) on my iPhone screen.
I doubt this user wants Android. He wants an *iPhone* without blobs.Go Samsung next time and find happiness.
Reminds me of the Touch Bar for the MPB. The sheer fact of having to look down is a distraction.The Dynamic Island is garbage and unintelligent design. It is pure distraction and I’m embarrassed the designers are so inept.
The STATUS BAR NEEDS TO BE STATIC. IT NEEDS TO BE SUBTLE. IT NEEDS TO NOT DISTRACT.
I doubt this user wants Android. He wants an *iPhone* without blobs.
Samsung don’t have black blobs on their
Phones, do they? So if they can do it, so can Apple, right?