Explain what’s happening in Israel, Seychelles, UK, Iceland and Gibraltar?
Re-read what I wrote.
Explain what’s happening in Israel, Seychelles, UK, Iceland and Gibraltar?
Has the CDC, NIH, FDA or Vaccine manufacturer even done studies and trials on mixing vaccines or was the person you personally know used as an experiment subject by their doctor.No, I know someone personally who needed epinephrine after getting first shot of Pfizer (exactly why they require you to stick around after getting the shot). She went to the doctor and he recommended to get a J&J shot to get fully vaccinated.
CDC literally recommends this: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/recommendations/specific-groups/allergies.html
This isn't hard.
That poster is providing an example, I find nothing racist in that example or inciting another to take any action.That's racist for you even to joke about that.
Has the CDC, NIH, FDA or Vaccine manufacturer even done studies and trials on mixing vaccines or was the person you personally know used as an experiment subject by their doctor.
![]()
NIH clinical trial evaluating mixed COVID-19 vaccine schedules begins
Trial to evaluate safety, immunogenicity of various vaccine booster regimens.www.nih.gov
Insulting. Reported. Not going to talk with you anymore. Here I thought we were having a civilized debate but you resorted to this awful type of behavior.Grow a pair.
So you are dismissing my point and fact that even if fully vaccinated it does not stop infection or illness. But you insist that fully vaccination is the answer.Re-read what I wrote.
That poster is providing an example, I find nothing racist in that example or inciting another to take any action. Grow a pair.
How is that insulting in any way? I hear you, cannot defend yourself don’t want to share your ball so throw a fit and go home. Got it.Insulting. Reported. Not going to talk with you anymore. Here I thought we were having a civilized debate but you resorted to this awful type of behavior.
No studies or trials have been done with mixing vaccines how is your doctor making this decision. If the patient died who is going to wear it the doctor, nah I forgot under EUA everyone has immunity from liability, got it.Re-read what the CDC recommended. CDC recommended those who are allergic to discuss with their doctor to see if cross vaccination is the right choice for them.
I did not say CDC recommended mixing vaccines
I think this is the problem you have. You don't read any links that are handed to you and you immediately get defensive.
No studies or trials have been done with mixing vaccines how is your doctor making this decision. If the patient died who is going to wear it the doctor, nah I forgot under EUA everyone has immunity from liability, got it.
Maybe the example was in poor taste, I just don’t get the overreaction by the other poster. People need to chill and tone down the “woke-ness”.They provided an example by comparing a long list of people who have done no harm to anyone around them with a group who does.
I know this story is floating around, but it isn't true/is incredibly misleading.Very good. I’m not for mandates at all, especially for something that’s still in a clinical study till 2023.
Even though Delta is much more infectious, the vaccines make it significantly less likely you'll get infected to begin with, as well as ensuring that if you do, your immune system will already have protective antibodies and t-cells to kick its arse and help you recover, and therefore not be infectious anymore, more quickly.Aren’t the vaccinated also equally spreading Delta. Help me understand your logic.
This isn't true. The efficacy of the authorised vaccines against Delta is much higher than that, and much higher than that when it comes to preventing serious cases that cause hospitalisation and death.It’s politically driven and done without transparency plus being less than 50% effective against Delta while FDA requires at least 50% or higher efficacy means the FDA is being disingenuous.
What? The main Pfizer trial involved 43,448 participants in multiple countries.Pfizer basically tainted the trial group and used the global population in mass with the aid of FDA to conduct its trial.
Greetings from the UK, where 88.2% of those eligible to be vaccinated (16+) are vaccinated, with the chart below showing our second and third waves, with the difference between the two being our vaccine rollout.The group on the right can also include the vaccinated, look at Israel, Seychelles, UK, Iceland and Gibraltar.
Aside from how antibody levels declining was expected, fortunately they aren't the only part of our immune response, and the evidence shows that there's still a lot of t and b-cells left over as well.Stop spreading FUD and read up on waning antibodies and ADE. It does not matter if you are injected people are carrying the same level of viral load and spreading it while also getting sick, hospitalized and dying.
Them unblinding participants (telling people who got the placebo and who didn't) after the phase 3 results were published, and offering those in the placebo group the real thing, does not "taint" the study group, nor invalidate any of the study results in any way. Furthermore, it would have been a violation of medical ethics for them to not do so once the vaccine was authorised, and would have been utterly impractical as well, as many/most participants would have simply quit the study and gotten vaccinated regardless.Well documented, you mean like Pfizer tainted the study groups by offering them the injection after the trials which was designed for 2 years. Only a few decided not to get injected after and it’s not enough data to make any conclusions.
Are you referring to the air one breathes? Food perhaps? Most modern countries have reports on air quality and one can choose ways to control the air they breathe, via home/office purifiers, or moving. Food? Folks have the right to grow and/or purchase organic. It's actually pretty easy to get an idea of what you're taking in, should you choose to do so.In a modern country, you are forcefully taken in foreign substances all the time. Mostly without a clue what it is as opposed to vaccines that are extremely well documented.
That article claims “boost immune response” and studies are required to see if it’s safe and effective it also has a published date of June 9th, 2021. No long term studies or trials, no mention of waning antibodies and how long and concentration of neutralizing antibodies.![]()
Mixing COVID-19 vaccines appears to boost immune responses
Findings from combination studies support measures to stretch supplies, avoid side effectswww.sciencemag.org
You said no studies. You were wrong.That article claims “boost immune response” and studies are required to see if it’s safe and effective it also has a published date of June 9th, 2021. No long term studies or trials, no mention of waning antibodies and how long and concentration of neutralizing antibodies.
Is there a reason why WHO is against mixing vaccines and has the US officially supported such measures. It also depends on when the personal friend of the poster received the recommendation to mix vaccines from their doctor.You said no studies. You were wrong.
”Canada and several European countries are now recommending a different vaccine for the second dose in some patients. Early data suggest the approach, born of necessity, may actually be beneficial.”
There’s also an uncontrolled study going on in Canada and several European countires, and I’ve heard nothing so far of widespread disaster.
You said no studies. You were wrong.
Perhaps because human beings should possess the right to not be forced to have foreign substances injected into their bodies for fear of losing their jobs. Educate > Debate > Freedom of choice
Whatever happened to “They are a private company and can make their own policy?”Mandate. Easy. Don’t like the policy, find another job.
![]()
Last year, Pelosi said the federal government " mandate vaccines, saying "it's a matter of privacy"
Last year, Pelosi said the federal government, mandate vaccines ," saying "it's a matter of privacy."rumble.com
Yeah, plus I don't really get why what Nancy Pelosi might have said last year, matters here? I mean unless I missed a load of people here pledging undying loyalty to going along with what she might have said in 2020, how is it relevant?The grammar is so broken on that post and article that I can’t tell what it means. That’s probably evidence of the quality of the source.
Nothing about this statement is true.Most who gained natural corona immunity don't need a vaccine.