I love how people judge Apple's "success" by how bloated its stock looks. Is that kind of "success" sustainable?
Bloated? Underpriced at the moment, you mean. Pick up some now at ca. 168 so you can sell them in a few days above 200.
I love how people judge Apple's "success" by how bloated its stock looks. Is that kind of "success" sustainable?
I'm not a fan of the price hikes at all. Was just pointing out people's exaggerations. If the price stays the same this year, I'll probably be going back to Android again.
It's more about principle than price for me at this point. I can afford these devices just fine, but it's getting a bit ridiculous.The "me" from five years ago would find this idea totally abhorrent. My my the difference five years makes.
The prices themselves don't really bother me; I can handle them. What does it for me is my perception of value. In that regard my opinion is the value Apple brings to the table today with their product lineup is at an all time low and has been on the downward trend since about 2014-15. Sure the iPhone X icosts $1500 - but it's not a $1500 phone.
I guess I'm unlike some people in that I do not exist to transfer wealth.
Doomed, I tell you.
I feel like phrase "Apple is doomed" should be added to a forum blacklist or something.I think the "Apple is doomed" narrative is more of an easy strawman these days than an actual argument made by detractors.
We all loved SJ, but you’re right that he totally missed the boat by not offering a premium version with some exclusive features alongside the iPhone 4. A lost opportunity!Best iPhone under SJ (iPhone 4 - 2010) started at $599, now it is $999. Is iPhone X 67% more innovative than the iPhone 4 was at the time of the release? I don't think so.
Give me one metric that supports AAPL’s valuation being bloated. Do you even follow the market? AAPL is trading under 19 times 2018 earnings and has $269B in cash.I love how people judge Apple's "success" by how bloated its stock looks. Is that kind of "success" sustainable?
Sure Apple has made mistakes but things like the Airpods are just plain awesome and have become mainstream within less than a year. Apple can still innovate, they are just misguided in certain areas. When they have real focus, they can do things well.They're proven 66.6% wrong. Two out of three ain't bad.
Well the high end samsung galaxy phone used to cost 400$, now it's 800/900$
I mean ... the point is pretty obvious ... all flagship devices from various companies have gone up in price.So what??? Whataboutery, seriously?
Um, this is where the entire market is headed. Phones aren’t just phones anymore. People are addicted to them. People will pay even more. Get over it.So what??? Whataboutery, seriously?
That's definition of 'catching a falling knife'.
People celebrating billionaires getting more billions for products that pale in comparison to their competition.
And charge more for the ‘privelege’.
Only Apple can do this.
It’s incredibly awesome. They will make $22B in PROFIT. In a quarter. What a company. I love it.You're a slave to capitalism, it's not awesome.
Did the same thing in my head yesterday and bought more shares. Absolutely dead on accurate.Good explanation of how stupid these iPhone X demand rumors are.
![]()
When I go to AT&T or Verizon I don’t see full price I see monthly. Verizon show full price but it’s small print. The monthly installment price is in big, bold font.But it didn’t start at $599. That was the subsidized price. The actual cost was hundreds more. Phones are not subsidized anymore so the price tag consumers see is more.
The WSJ and others can’t be bothered to pull up Apple’s financials to see how stupid these rumors are. But we’re supposed to believe this isn’t intentional and these articles are written in good faith. BS.Did the same thing in my head yesterday and bought more shares. Absolutely dead on accurate.
Oh it’s intentional. It’s also highly illegal so I don’t understand why we have his dog and pony show every quarter. Nikkei has done it before. It’s wiping a lot of shareholder value out very quickly and it’s just idiotic. I am buying more today. I might be wrong, but I will hold until the real facts change.When I go to AT&T or Verizon I don’t see full price I see monthly. Verizon show full price but it’s small print. The monthly installment price is in big, bold font.
[doublepost=1517343119][/doublepost]
The WSJ and others can’t be bothered to pull up Apple’s financials to see how stupid these rumors are. But we’re supposed to believe this isn’t intentional and these articles are written in good faith. BS.
Can we not? Please.
Get an iPhone SE which is cheaper(399) and way more powerful than iphone 4.Best iPhone under SJ (iPhone 4 - 2010) started at $599, now it is $999. Is iPhone X 67% more innovative than the iPhone 4 was at the time of the release? I don't think so.
Moderator Note:
Can everyone just give the 'Apple is doomed' crap a rest.
We don't care if you are pro-Apple, anti-Apple or indifferent, please give it a rest as it's not funny any more and is getting really boring.
Thank you.
Incorrect. $599 WAS the full price. The subsidized price was $199
Nope. The iPhone 4 was 1€ on a 39€ plan or 599€ without contract. Now it’s like 399€ for the iPhone X on a 49€ plan. Insanity.
No sir, you got it wrong. The subsidized price of the iPhone 4 was $199 and $299 for the 16GB and 32GB model respectively. $599 was the off-contract price for 16GB.
Historical revisionism is hard in the age of the internet.
https://mashable.com/2010/06/07/iphone-4-pricing-2/#cbrZHDjbjmq9
And I bought a 4S without contract in Canada for $649 CDN directly from Apple on pre-order day.
Back in 2010 all you needed was £500 and you would buy the latest iPhone! Now, you can't buy anything with £500.