Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I (and anyone) can run a local LLM on their computer that is nearly as good as ChatGPT for most things. It's free and community trained. That being said, the fact that apple is so far behind on this makes me wonder how bad 'missing this ship' is going to hurt the company. Siri is pitiful.
 
Bad voice recognition where "play elton john" looks for elon musk songs has nothing to do with privacy.

Having basic functions not work - like telling siri to play a playlist, and getting something completely different, or a message that there is no playlist, or telling it to add a task to an app and getting told that there's no app installed (when the same command worked fine the day before), has nothing to do with privacy.

Being able to chain commands together like 'set the lights to 50% red' instead of having to say 50% and red as two commands has nothing to do with privacy.

Taking actions without repeating back the entire command has nothing to do with privacy.

The dreaded 'here's what I found on the web' response because it's brain dead has nothing to do with privacy.

Having it take massive engineering effort to remove 'hey' from 'hey siri' has nothing to with privacy.

Letting users set their own keyword instead of Siri, has nothing to do with privacy.

Privacy ahead of functionality is just a cop out for not investing in the product. Siri hasn't improved in years, even with massive computational improvements in the hardware platform. The code is the problem.

We don't need generative AI that has a huge built in bias, is built on stolen IP, obscures sources, and hallucinates facts. We need an AI assistant that's not still the same 1.0 code when Apple bought the company.
 
I'm guessing you're not a successful author, or a successful writer in general. I mean it would be great if folks wrote successful books or music and said "this is now owned by humanity, so it's free to all", but that's not how the world works.
100% agree, and the key there is that it's yours. You can decide to give it away or sell it. People can decide to buy it or not. But using IP without compensation or consent is theft. I expect ChatGPT and stable diffusion to be sued out of existence in the next few years (the Getty case is a great example of that).

Without copyright we wouldn't have MacOS, ARM chips, or pretty much anything else Apple sells.
 
The above shows just how different the public thinks AI is from how it really works. The current technology can not create new things. Yes you can ask it write a program in Python that already exists. Like "write a program to blink an LED" and this works because the model was trained on hunded of blogsthat show beginnig students how to make an LED blink.

But what it can't do is this "Hey GPT, our robot code is designed to keep the center of gravity inside the support polygon. This is good, but to work better we need to keep the zero-moment point inside the polygon. Can you modify the code to use IMU data to do this."

The current tech is not able to do the second example, and it is not "just a matter of time" until it can. It is like waiting for railway locomotive technology to be able to fly. It never will. We need very different technology to fly, not just upgraded trains.

Our current AI tech has ZERO understanding of what it does. The harder coding request absolutely requires understanding and not just a huge memory.

That said, MANY interesting problems can be solved using only "huge memory". Most of us in our day-to-day lives don't need to invent new things
Technically the railway locomotive is already flying for ten years in certain countries. Do not underestimate AI. Everyone did, if not, nobody would be caught by surprise by ChatGPT.
 
At this point ChatGPT and similar seems very overblown. When I have used it, it just seems like a super powerful search engine that puts "results" into paragraph format like a person summarizing what it finds. When I ask it for directions to do things I often find errors in the steps and have to have it correct itself or start over. I tried to have it write an example essay for one of my graduate courses and the sources it gives me sometimes don't exist (???) and once it rick-rolled me on a YouTube video source which was funny but not helpful.

I assume AI specialized for specific purposes is obviously much better, but all of these data-based chat AI don't seem much more helpful than the MSN bots of old at the moment.
there is a reason why prompt engineering is so popular right now. Learning how to talk to ChatGPT and prompt it correctly is everything. I have had it write CSS and html, macros for excel and tons of blog posts and other SEO needs. It is wild how good it is. I couldn't do any coding before it. Not only that, but just how rapidly it's improving is probably the scariest/coolest thing.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Pinkyyy 💜🍎
The current “AI” (which has nothing Intelligent about it) is just a hype like all the other hypes before it. In 3-5 years AI will be like self driving cars all over. We thought it was the be-all-end-all to the intire industy, but it turned out that what we wanted was WAY more complicated than what it can do. But it does have some real potential in certain and well controlled situations.
 
" data-source="post: 32326725" class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch">
Not enough courage. I guess Apple wants to create it's down version of ChatGPT and claim they re-invented it?

At the current rate, I give it another 1-2 years before AI becomes another dirty word like add or social media. Giving Apple the opportunity to swop in with their own privacy-focused alternative with fewer drawbacks.
 
I am not sure you should call Siri an AI, it is an assistant program not an artificial agent. Also machine learning is not AI as it doesn't have ability to 'think' but rather 'to supply the best answer based on neural patterns'. I am happy with Siri as it is, it doesn't need an intelligent, just something I can call out for weather, timer, schedule, calling, switch on my kitchen lights. Thanks Siri for being a good maid you are.

Apple might comes out with new software that has capability to 'think' not just 'learn' in the future. As for today, I don't think it is necessary to replace homo sapiens yet with a machine.
 
I’m a frequent user of ChatGPT. The more I use it, the more moronic Siri comes across.
Apple has not put enough effort in evolving their assistant. In order for such a thing to work you have to involve the public and work with beta programs. Now they are in a FOMO mode.
 
Siri still doesn’t reliably recognize my mother’s name when I ask her to start a FaceTime call. 20% fail rate

She even seems to get worse if I enunciate.

If I ask for my sister, I always have today her last name then first name, if I don’t she 100% fails.
 
  • Sad
Reactions: Pinkyyy 💜🍎
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.