Just let me translate it to human speech: Money and fear to lose power/control.
Last edited:
No. Your point doesn't "remain" but rather it changed.And my point remains, as Mac does better job as a “real work” computer, Apple keeps Macs in check when it comes to some hardware features.
Apple makes sure iPad holds up and differentiates with best built-in display, touchscreen, Pencil support, iPhone-level cameras and lighter chassis. Give those away to Mac and sure, no point of selling iPad Pros.
Apple will take years to develop whatever it is they believe will be a quality product. Be it software, features, or hardware. Both the iPad and iPhone were not feature complete at the time they came out. But, they excelled overtime by adding features that either should have already been there. Or features that are requested. The latter speaks more to the iPad now with OS 26. People wanted it to do more. So they uplifted the OS to do that in a way that fits the iPad. Not by installing macOS, but by making iPadOS better for the iPad.When you buy a Mac, even for basic use, you’re getting a powerful machine. It comes with capable native apps, and for most everyday tasks, there’s no real need to purchase additional software—unless you’re doing professional work. The same can’t be said for the iPad. Even for something as simple as note-taking, third-party apps often outperform Apple Notes. Meanwhile, Samsung offers a more seamless user experience in some areas. Perhaps iPadOS 26 will change that.
Sure, it’s my choice whether or not to spend money on apps, and Apple isn’t forcing anyone. But it often feels like Apple intentionally holds back certain features, nudging users toward paid alternatives.
This is a strange take.When you buy a Mac, even for basic use, you’re getting a powerful machine. It comes with capable native apps, and for most everyday tasks, there’s no real need to purchase additional software—unless you’re doing professional work. The same can’t be said for the iPad. Even for something as simple as note-taking, third-party apps often outperform Apple Notes. Meanwhile, Samsung offers a more seamless user experience in some areas. Perhaps iPadOS 26 will change that.
MacBook Air can run all the same things that a MacBook Pro can.Actually they do distinguish between a MBA and MBP.
It's different, but I never really found file management on the iPad that much more complicated. But I have also been using an iPad since 2012 (long before the iPad had the files app or supported external storage), so it's possible that for me, iPad's style of file management is "the norm" while PC-style file management is the "anomaly". The iPad was just so new and revolutionary to me that I was willing to invest the time and resources to make it work.It's the iPad file system that I find very different to the more simple oe on my MacBook Air. - Saving, moving and opening files on iPad is more difficult than on MacBook - maybe I should think differently on iPad ?
What can you run on an iPad Pro that you can’t run on an iPad Air?MacBook Air can run all the same things that a MacBook Pro can.
It's getting the balance right, more advanced functionality without compromising the simplicity of the OS for average users.It's nice, but must lose limitations that block using iPads for more advanced workflows.
It's getting the balance right, more advanced functionality without compromising the simplicity of the OS for average users.
meant my files were readily available across all my computing devices, which in turn meant less of a need for external storage.
Apple IS letting you decide. Buy the hardware (Mac or iPad) that does what you want. Geeks don’t seem to understand: iPad is a finished product, not a naked robotic core that you can tinker with to your heart’s delight.let both os’s keeps their core strengths, but let me decide how to use the hardware. at keast the ipad pro should have this option, that would give it a real selling point, though all of them could definitely run this way.
You wan’t all that stuff? Then BAFMA! (Buy A Freakin’ MacBook, Already).UI is fine.
All the limitations are things Apple has chosen to block. Removing those limitations changes nothing for “common users”, but would make the platform usable for “advanced users”. All those can me opt in to ensure literally nothing changes for a common user.
Options like
- Terminal available
- Never terminate a process (swap it out instead)
- Allow background processes from Terminal
- Allow JIT
- Allow Docker
- Allow running these apps (from outside App Store)
- Allow running self compiled apps
Totally! Apple’s product and marketing philosophy has never been about shoehorning one product’s OS onto another just to appease a few tightwad geeks.GOOD. The iPad should NEVER run a Mac. It's a ridiculously stupid idea. Touch first devices should run touch first operating systems.
Those who want a Mac on an iPad should just buy a freaking Mac. 🤦♂️
You wan’t all that stuff? Then BAFMA! (Buy A Freakin’ MacBook, Already).
Not directed specifically at you, but really tired of all these people who already have great MacBooks, Mac Minis, iMacs and Mac Studios for their use not being satisfied and grateful for this, but instead want to greedily takeover iPad, too. What’s it hurting you folks to let the rest of us have our device?I don't understand what is the value add of this answer. I mean, buy whatever it fits your case is a tautology. There is no need for feedback then ... no learning involved.
I can only imagine the aggravation of opening up an iPadOS version of Activity Monitor, tapping on and quitting various apps and processes that are running in the background. Apple has no interest in opening up the iPad to that extent. Or even worse, Windows' Task Manager, which is multitudes more complicated.I like the direction that iPadOS is going in. This is a BIG step forward.
Running MacOS on it - IMHO would pose a lot of problems.. iPads can run hot just doing iPad things.. I can't imagine what MacOS would to the the heat that the passively cooled device would be able to manage.
Imagine Lightroom - the Desktop version and all the complaints - do we blame Adobe, Apple? This is just one example.
Make iPadOS better, and then better again.
You wan’t all that stuff? Then BAFMA! (Buy A Freakin’ MacBook, Already).
Not directed specifically at you, but really tired of all these people who already have great MacBooks, Mac Minis, iMacs and Mac Studios for their use not being satisfied and grateful for this, but instead want to greedily takeover iPad, too. What’s it hurting you folks to let the rest of us have our device?
just in imagine if iPads had Mac OS on it. It would be no need for people to buy MacBooks
Why then is the first device in the morning that he uses for an hour a Mac?He's not a Mac guy. He never has been.
Yep, people generally ignore reality until it bites them in the a$$.This is literally the WORST take I’ve ever read in these forums.
Until it goes out of sync. Until you are managing fairly large files ... so on and so forth. Don't get me wrong, I use Cloud Storage all the time, but the idea that local storage can be replaced with Cloud Storage, in practice does not work well.