I'm sure Stage Manager could work on non M1 iPads but the number of apps that could run simultaneously would be more restricted than Apple would like.
“End of support”? bro we’re talking about the 2020 iPad Pro here, less than a year ago that was the most expensive iPad they sold and now they’re saying “it isn’t powerful enough” 🤣Maybe, but why try to make new features work with old hardware that is approaching end of support?
I get it, nice for the customer, but as far as apple is concerned, it is adding complexity to the codebase for hardware that won't be viable for many more years.
And un-necessary complexity in software is a major source of bugs.
Yes agree with everything you say, you posted whilst i was typing my postSee my most recent post just above.
I'm sure Stage Manager could work on non M1 iPads but the number of apps that could run simultaneously would be more restricted than Apple would like.
That chip was paired with 16GB of RAM and ram, the CPU ran at a higher frequency and had its own fan and heatsink.A12z in the 2020 DTK was powerful enough to run macOS… yet the Apple is saying a12z isn’t powerful enough to run stage manager? I don’t buy any of it.
That being said, I have the m1 iPad Pro so I’m looking forward to proper external monitor support on iPadOS. Finally after all these years.
Hardly. They drop support for 1 feature and support everything else. It’s not like they aren’t releasing iPadOS 16 at all for them.Key being that they would like. No sense in letting the user get what they can out of their existing devices.
Hardly. They drop support for 1 feature and support everything else. It’s not like they aren’t releasing iPadOS 16 at all for them.
Apple, the experience was **** on iPads with 4GB of RAM (slower memory speed too). We didn’t think it was much better for the 3 guys that bought 1TB units with 6GB of ram, especially as the storage was 50% slower.You aren’t making the point you think you are. The question is why? The answer, they gave, is crap.
The A12 is a 4 year old cpu… the 2020 iPad was known to be the iPad not to get, as the update from the 2018 were LiDAR and more cores.If only older iPad Pros had that much RAM. If they have less, it's a decision Apple made not to do it.
Too bad Apple can't look 2 years into their own product roadmap to figure out that 6GB RAM might be a "Pro" problem.
Then I also have the right to say that Apple’s statement is purely BS.I never said you couldn’t ask. You are not however entitled to receive the information you want. Nor is a company morally or legally obligated to provide that. Internal testing did not show performance meeting the minimum standards they were looking for.
Whether I “believe anything big companies are saying” is ultimately irrelevant. Access to the why behind the decisions Apple makes is not your right, regardless of how much you may wish that to be you. You are not the one they are accountable to, and you are not the one who is going to receive the information behind those decisions. This is not unique to apple.
Against the last comment about the DTK, yeah you have a 8/8 A12Z running in a Mac mini 16GB RAM/512GB SSD running a beta of Big Sur with full multitasking, fluid movable windows. So a 4th gen A12Z based iPad Pro should be able to run Stage Manager under iPadOS 16 you would think if it could run Big Sur just fine. Even with this attempt to broaden iPadOS to be multitasking, seeing that example of 12.9" iPad Pro using Stage Manager with a Studio Display is a lot of money just for that IMHO.When I switched to the Mac, I started with an iMac 2006 C2D with 1GB of memory. Coming from Windows, I was blown away by its smooth animations (Expose, Front Row, etc.) and multi-tasking capabilities. The last couple of A-series chips are so much better than that old T7200 chip, I’m sure Apple could have found a way to make it work. The Mac Mini A12 ran macOS wonderfully and it didn’t have that weird limit on opened windows.
Yeah, but basically what they say is that most iOS devices are underpowered when it comes to memory.Apple knew this would be a point that was going to be brought up and surely even had this statement and response ready.
Apple challenged themselves with their new M1 chip to push iPadOS to a new limit and achieved it.
Stage Manager looks great. And true external monitor support, cmon.
![]()
16GB of RAM along with a CPU cooler and fan kinda helps. Same people moaning about this were the same that said Apple could do more with the M1 chip on iPadOS. 🤣When I switched to the Mac, I started with an iMac 2006 C2D with 1GB of memory. Coming from Windows, I was blown away by its smooth animations (Expose, Front Row, etc.) and multi-tasking capabilities. The last couple of A-series chips are so much better than that old T7200 chip, I’m sure Apple could have found a way to make it work. The Mac Mini A12 ran macOS wonderfully and it didn’t have that weird limit on opened windows.
Exactly. That way everyone gets something new while people still get reasons to upgrade.They could have probably made the feature work on older iPad Pro's without the external display support, but you could still have it on the device.
The 2018/2020 were pretty powerful chips.