Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Maybe, but why try to make new features work with old hardware that is approaching end of support?

I get it, nice for the customer, but as far as apple is concerned, it is adding complexity to the codebase for hardware that won't be viable for many more years.

And un-necessary complexity in software is a major source of bugs.
“End of support”? bro we’re talking about the 2020 iPad Pro here, less than a year ago that was the most expensive iPad they sold and now they’re saying “it isn’t powerful enough” 🤣
 
  • Like
Reactions: klasma
I don’t own a M1 iPad Pro, which resolutions are supported for stage manager? For example I have a Samsung CRG9 32:9 display, is that supported?
 
A12z in the 2020 DTK was powerful enough to run macOS… yet the Apple is saying a12z isn’t powerful enough to run stage manager? I don’t buy any of it.

That being said, I have the m1 iPad Pro so I’m looking forward to proper external monitor support on iPadOS. Finally after all these years.
That chip was paired with 16GB of RAM and ram, the CPU ran at a higher frequency and had its own fan and heatsink.
 
Key being that they would like. No sense in letting the user get what they can out of their existing devices.
Hardly. They drop support for 1 feature and support everything else. It’s not like they aren’t releasing iPadOS 16 at all for them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Greezeg
What a lame excuse of Apple, they simply don’t want to invest a bit more of resources to make it work properly on older iPads, it’s called lazy programming and purely based on business strategy. The older iPads would be able to run it, just like the Intel Macs, too.
But yeah when you run out of ideas hardware wise, you have to invent senseless software limitations and try to drag people to stores that way.

Just like they decided to drop the iPhone 7 support for iOS16, despite…
  • The iPhone 7 devices use the A10 Fusion, a chip that also powered iPads that are supported by iOS 16.

E.g. look at what you can do with FreeBSD/Linux (+ Compiz) on 15years old far less capable hardware with crapy shared memory Intel GMA Graphics and uncountable of Windows running at same time.


Do they really want to make us believe that 1-2ys old iPads are not capable of displaying a few skewed thumbnails with downscaled Apps? Sorry Apple, in that case the coding skills of your Devs and your Metal API just sucks.

Anyway, this was probably my last iPad, I use it for drawing, a bit of couch 3d concept sculpting and tech notes. Since MS fixed the Surface 8 Pen Jitter I’m thinking about getting me one, it runs a proper OS and does all this and more just fine.
 
Last edited:
Hardly. They drop support for 1 feature and support everything else. It’s not like they aren’t releasing iPadOS 16 at all for them.

You aren’t making the point you think you are. The question is why? The answer, they gave, is crap.
 
You aren’t making the point you think you are. The question is why? The answer, they gave, is crap.
Apple, the experience was **** on iPads with 4GB of RAM (slower memory speed too). We didn’t think it was much better for the 3 guys that bought 1TB units with 6GB of ram, especially as the storage was 50% slower.
 
If only older iPad Pros had that much RAM. If they have less, it's a decision Apple made not to do it.

Too bad Apple can't look 2 years into their own product roadmap to figure out that 6GB RAM might be a "Pro" problem.
The A12 is a 4 year old cpu… the 2020 iPad was known to be the iPad not to get, as the update from the 2018 were LiDAR and more cores.
 
Ok Stage Manager doesn’t work due to lack of RAM I get that, although I still think its BS and a way of forcing upgrades. However true external display support there is no excuse for not properly supporting that even if its a simple case of one app on one screen and another on the other screen with no fancy window manager.

Far less capable laptops have been doing proper 2nd screen support for many years now so there is no reason the older iPad Pro’s cannot do this properly. This is an iPadOS release from the bean counters not the engineers.
 
I never said you couldn’t ask. You are not however entitled to receive the information you want. Nor is a company morally or legally obligated to provide that. Internal testing did not show performance meeting the minimum standards they were looking for.

Whether I “believe anything big companies are saying” is ultimately irrelevant. Access to the why behind the decisions Apple makes is not your right, regardless of how much you may wish that to be you. You are not the one they are accountable to, and you are not the one who is going to receive the information behind those decisions. This is not unique to apple.
Then I also have the right to say that Apple’s statement is purely BS. :) If Apple doesn’t want to be honest to what they themselves claimed, then I have the choice not to believe what they said. ;) I have the right to come up with the conclusion that the motivation here is financial, not technical.
 
When I switched to the Mac, I started with an iMac 2006 C2D with 1GB of memory. Coming from Windows, I was blown away by its smooth animations (Expose, Front Row, etc.) and multi-tasking capabilities. The last couple of A-series chips are so much better than that old T7200 chip, I’m sure Apple could have found a way to make it work. The Mac Mini A12 ran macOS wonderfully and it didn’t have that weird limit on opened windows.
Against the last comment about the DTK, yeah you have a 8/8 A12Z running in a Mac mini 16GB RAM/512GB SSD running a beta of Big Sur with full multitasking, fluid movable windows. So a 4th gen A12Z based iPad Pro should be able to run Stage Manager under iPadOS 16 you would think if it could run Big Sur just fine. Even with this attempt to broaden iPadOS to be multitasking, seeing that example of 12.9" iPad Pro using Stage Manager with a Studio Display is a lot of money just for that IMHO.
 
Apple knew this would be a point that was going to be brought up and surely even had this statement and response ready.

Apple challenged themselves with their new M1 chip to push iPadOS to a new limit and achieved it.

Stage Manager looks great. And true external monitor support, cmon.

:apple:
Yeah, but basically what they say is that most iOS devices are underpowered when it comes to memory.

I am in no way interested in stage manager, not even on my Mac. I always liked my apps to be full screen instead of this overlapping clutter. Gives me focus. And Windows has always been the OS with the better window management (snapping, switching etc - so fast with a few key clicks or mouse movements)

But it annoys me that even on my new iPad (not pro and not M1) I can too often sense lack of memory when switching between apps and I am probably not even close to what some try to do. This part of the experience has always annoyed me on iOS.
 
When I switched to the Mac, I started with an iMac 2006 C2D with 1GB of memory. Coming from Windows, I was blown away by its smooth animations (Expose, Front Row, etc.) and multi-tasking capabilities. The last couple of A-series chips are so much better than that old T7200 chip, I’m sure Apple could have found a way to make it work. The Mac Mini A12 ran macOS wonderfully and it didn’t have that weird limit on opened windows.
16GB of RAM along with a CPU cooler and fan kinda helps. Same people moaning about this were the same that said Apple could do more with the M1 chip on iPadOS. 🤣
 
  • Like
Reactions: cupcakes2000
When M1 iPads were released, there was a lot of talk in the theme of: "M1 is excessive for iPads, don't need it, my 2018 serves me more than enough, etc etc."

Are the same people now upset they don't get the latest features for their old iPads? Sounds absurd in my view. Of course newest features are also tied to the newest architectures. It makes sense they focus only on the M-series for new features. Your A-processor series iPads serve you well enough, you don't need anything new.
 
They could have probably made the feature work on older iPad Pro's without the external display support, but you could still have it on the device.

The 2018/2020 were pretty powerful chips.
Exactly. That way everyone gets something new while people still get reasons to upgrade.
But nah, lets force them to upgrade to get any subtantial features apart from a weather app and incomplete lock screen. Might as well make iPadOS upgrades paid again, actually Apple don't even think about it.
 
Given that my very first PC with Windows 3.1 did support resizable windows almost 30 years ago (a feature even older Macs also supported even long before that date), this statement that 2020 iPad Pros do not have enough memory to support such a desktop does not speak highly about the efficient use of modern hardware.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.