Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
A. Apple could pick up and move overseas more than it has.

B. Are you kidding me?? The city and county still gets sales taxes from employees buying fuel, food, and from their payroll...which for a company that size is quite a bit.

Texas is a right to work state...Apple is anti union..they have little interest of relocating to a union state.

Apple was founded and is based in a union state and as far as I know they have no desire to relocate to aright to work (without pay) state for those are known to attract only second class talent.
 
I'm really tired of silly rhetoric like this. They are not creating jobs out of the goodness of their hearts. Companies hire as an investment. It is not a favor to the local populace. The mentality that you should be grateful is beyond silly.
Choice: Be grateful and get jobs. Be ungrateful and not get jobs. Seven cities are in line to get the deal, six of which are in another country.

The government frequently says, lay down and pay a fine or, go to court and roll the dice.

The former paragraph is far more constitutional than the latter.

Rocketman

Proposed policy modification: "So long as this government has a tax and spend policy and continues to run deficits causing annual monetary and buying power destruction, to the pain of its own citizens and us, we elect to bias our business activities overseas. Starting today our domestic US operations will be owned overseas in tax friendly regions and we will operate them accordingly."

The government will then have a choice of its own. Deficit and roll the dice.
 
Last edited:
So that's the barometer of a state's health eh? I'd like to hear who is in better shape than Texas. You better not say california

California is in poor shape as a state (referendum process locks down revenue streams), but they send out more funds than they receive back.
 
Choice: Be grateful and get jobs. Be ungrateful and not get jobs. Seven cities are in line to get the deal, six of which are in another country.

The government frequently says, lay down and pay a fine or, go to court and roll the dice.

The former paragraph is far more constitutional than the latter.

Rocketman

Proposed policy modification: "So long as this government has a tax and spend policy and continues to run deficits causing annual monetary and buying power destruction, to the pain of its own citizens and us, we elect to bias our business activities overseas. Starting today our domestic US operations will be owned overseas in tax friendly regions and we will operate them accordingly."

The government will then have a choice of its own. Deficit and roll the dice.

There is something fundamentally wrong with many americans - especially the republicans. They love their constitution but hate the government failing to realize that the two are inseparable. The main goal of the constitution is to define how the government gets elected and how it operates. Americans first elect the government and then treat it as a hunta. Corporations are not humans. They can't hold government a hostage. Those perverted thoughts of yours belong to spcific individuals, usually republicans, who in perverted way think they are "great americans".
 
There is something fundamentally wrong with many americans - especially the republicans. They love their constitution but hate the government failing to realize that the two are inseparable. The main goal of the constitution is to define how the government gets elected and how it operates. Americans first elect the government and then treat it as a hunta. Corporations are not humans. They can't hold government a hostage. Those perverted thoughts of yours belong to spcific individuals, usually republicans, who in perverted way think they are "great americans".
Interesting anarchist argument. And personal attack.

My take on my words is keep your government on a short leash, and give it feedback when it is doing something objectionable. We do live in a Republic after all. We have to communicate with our representatives to get results and voting alone is too crude.

Corporations could use a serious legal and priority downgrade as compared to natural persons.

Rocketman
 
Choice: Be grateful and get jobs. Be ungrateful and not get jobs. Seven cities are in line to get the deal, six of which are in another country.

The government frequently says, lay down and pay a fine or, go to court and roll the dice.

The former paragraph is far more constitutional than the latter.

Rocketman

Proposed policy modification: "So long as this government has a tax and spend policy and continues to run deficits causing annual monetary and buying power destruction, to the pain of its own citizens and us, we elect to bias our business activities overseas. Starting today our domestic US operations will be owned overseas in tax friendly regions and we will operate them accordingly."

The government will then have a choice of its own. Deficit and roll the dice.

Usually you make better posts than this, even if I don't always agree with them. Buying power has been headed in a poor direction for a long time, and many things have contributed to this including the wars and bad banking policies over the past two decades. They aren't the sole problem, but the scope of their impact makes it more difficult to interpret the rest of the data.

At some point we will have to drastically cut things like defense budgets, cut subsidies, cut services, and maintain taxes. It won't be pretty. Anyway the problems we're facing didn't start within the last few years.
 
Texas is in a better economic position than much of the US right now. Maybe they don't need to bend over for Apple?

Austin is in the best shape economically out of all of the cities in the country right now but they're not dumb enough to pass on 3200 jobs being added to the area.
 
Usually you make better posts than this, even if I don't always agree with them. Buying power has been headed in a poor direction for a long time, and many things have contributed to this including the wars and bad banking policies over the past two decades.
Evidence it is largely this administration's policies:

http://www.currencywarsbook.com/201...g-committees-subcommittee-on-economic-policy/

Also:

http://www.newsmax.com/BradleyBlakeman/U-Seconomy-velocity-money/2012/03/02/id/431249

http://historysquared.com/2012/04/1...in-etns-money-velocity-changes-like-the-wind/

http://youcreatemoney.com/16-money-velocity-slows/

https://mises.org/daily/918

"What matters right now is the fact that money is growing at an alarming rate, which sets in motion an exchange of nothing for something and, hence, economic impoverishment and consequent boom-bust cycles. Furthermore, since velocity is not an independent entity, it as such causes nothing and hence cannot offset effects from money supply growth."

:D

As I pointed out in another thread, in light of these facts, for Cook to essentially double the capabilities of iPad3 (and soon iPhone5 and MacPro and Powerbook), for the same price with a declining currency purchasing power in major countries, he is doing some serious supply chain magic and it can't last much longer. Buy now.

Rocketman
 
Last edited:
Looks like we have some conservatives here who are in favor in corporate welfare who also probably complain about social welfare.

:apple:
 
There is something fundamentally wrong with many americans - especially the republicans. They love their constitution but hate the government failing to realize that the two are inseparable. The main goal of the constitution is to define how the government gets elected and how it operates. Americans first elect the government and then treat it as a hunta. Corporations are not humans. They can't hold government a hostage. Those perverted thoughts of yours belong to spcific individuals, usually republicans, who in perverted way think they are "great americans".

So, what you are saying is, the Government hates competition from the evil Corporations (criminals)! You are right, the constitution and government are inseparable. But, the preamble and section 8 states:

"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."​

Section. 8. "The Congress shall have Power to lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;"​

I put these two quotes up for a reason. Section 8, to remind you, is for the federal side of taxes not generally for the "local" side. "Local" governments that want to bring jobs and companies can provide "incentives" through tax relief can do this under their own constitution. But, to demonize any company for trying to get a better deal is wrong. We built this country on blood, sweat and tears of our ancestors. And remember, it was the government that took advantage of the Native Americans way before your accusation of corporations.

The "perversions" that you mention are among ALL party lines. I love my government, but I hate the politicians! I have served in the military for over 20 years and I am proud to do so. As with any writings (good and bad) we do take it and read it in different interpretations.

Have a great day!
 
That's not what he said. Let them set the tax rates but require that those be equal for all companies.

But that does absolutely nothing to keep states from fighting with other by lowering the tax rates. Since that was the specific problem he was addressing, I find it hard to believe that's what he meant.

No, it is not one big mixing bowl. Not where the provision of government services are concerned. They are paid for out of tax collections. The "economic development" benefits are amorphous, at best. Construction doesn't even have to go to local firms. The jobs can be low-paying and go to people who don't live in the city and county. For certain these inflows don't make up for the tax loss. It's cost-shifting. Companies extort these give-backs out of local governments because they can.

So it sounds like, to you, Austin should just let Apple go somewhere else and the city just shouldn't care? Do I have that right? The benefits of them being there are not worth Austin worrying about?
 
Last edited:
They don't need any tax breaks ... And why should they get any ... What a joke ... They need to keep this sort of stuff quiet or they'll be loosing sales ... And quite frankly its what used to be called corruption

I don't know if some of you live in the 1920s or what but companties getting tax breaks for locating sizable businesses in an area is standard these days. Municipalities want businesses for a number of reasons and benefit from then greatly outside of short term tax revenue. Nobody is forcing anyone to give tax breaks but large businesses are in demand and cities compete for them. To not take advantage of that would be dumb and fiscally irresponsible.
 
So it sounds like, to you, Austin should just let Apple go somewhere else and the city just shouldn't care? Do I have that right? The benefits of them being there are not worth Austin worrying about?

Not sounds like, is. Local governments set tax rates to pay for services. If someone gets preferential treatment on taxes, then someone else has to make up the difference. Pretty straight forward.
 
3,600 people paying income tax and sales tax and homeowner taxes and car taxes provides lots of revenue.

It's up to Texas and Arizona to fight over that revenue.

What do you suggest? If you're on that city council you'd say "yeah, sure. Go send all that money to Arizona. We don't need it"? (Not to mention that your unemployment rate is worse since there are 3,600 fewer jobs than there otherwise would have been.)

That's not a move that will get you reelected.




Then give us a solution. What should that city council do?

FYI Texas does not have income tax but the rest stands.

----------

Given the current situation, where they apparently do have to fight with Arizona over tax subsidies, is what is indefensible and no, I don't have a short term solution. The real solution would be to ban tax breaks, subsidies and corporate welfare nation wide for publicly traded companies.

That is dumb. Many a city have prospered due to relationships and deals with corporate partners. In some cases there are issues that would prevent some cities from ever seeing new large businesses moving there without incentives. Your take on this is short sighted and naive. Nobody is being forced to do anything. No municipality should enter into an agreement unless they feel it is beneficial to them long term.
 
Warren Buffet pays less taxes than his secretary.

Sorry to pick on you, but this comment, in my opinion, illustrates why the American public elects idiots to political offices: the electorate gets sloppy with simple facts. While I don't have either of their tax returns in front of me, I am fairly confident Warren Buffet pays far more taxes than his secretary. What Mr. Buffet stated in the media was that his tax rate was lower than his secretary's.
 
Not sounds like, is. Local governments set tax rates to pay for services. If someone gets preferential treatment on taxes, then someone else has to make up the difference. Pretty straight forward.

It is not a zero-sum game. If the income to the local government generated by a business exceeds the cost of the tax breaks given to the business, then the local government realizes a net increase in their revenue, regardless of what other businesses are being taxed. In this case, the long-term economic gain to the local economy is likely to be substantial.
 
This sounds like standard negotiations to me. Both sides what a deal that is favorable to them, but the customer (Apple) can go else-where to build their campus, so they are threatening to use a different supplier (of land).

----------



Because they are saying "We will create thousands of jobs in your city". "After the tax breaks go away, you'll get lots of money from us."

Actually, after the tax breaks go away...Apple will threaten to move again unless new breaks are put in. All companies do it and it's terrible.
Tax breaks should be banned. Let companies build where they want at the market rate.
 
Not sounds like, is. Local governments set tax rates to pay for services. If someone gets preferential treatment on taxes, then someone else has to make up the difference. Pretty straight forward.

So why do governments all over do this?

You say there's no reason for it, so why do they do it?
 
So why do governments all over do this?

You say there's no reason for it, so why do they do it?
Because you pretty much have to as long as municipalities are willing to under cut one another. You just hope that you don't go one incentive too far and screw yourself (like Michigan did w/their film making incentive from a couple years ago).

To steal a phrase, the only thing worse than doing business with them is not doing business with them. ;)


Lethal
 
Ricky's follies

It should be everyone's wish from deep in their souls that Apple tells the people in and around Austin - JAM IT IN YOUR AS** . Apple should move out of Austin - COMPLETLY .....

Austin is a rat pit. The weather sucks, the people suck, the local government is terrible, the racism is blatant and outrageous, bigotry in every fabric of daily life tears families art at an enormously high rate, and most had rather cut you ear to ear with a beer bottle than look at you.

AND, worst of all, it's TEXAS. They truly believe that the only way to " correct" their direction for their constituents is turn back the calendars for their 'followers'. It's time to throw those folks off a building and move on.

Apple should just say NO... NO THANKS. WE'RE LEAVING.
 
I don't think Apple should be getting a tax break, average Joe should have tax breaks. Apple has quite a lot of cash, some of which could be spent on improving the country.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.