They are not silencing anyone, the developer signed a contract with Apple, which is confidential between the two parties,
And this is a good thing... why? Please explain that to me. Imho, this type of thing doesn't benefit ANYONE. Even Apple.
why should they go outside of that agreement and blab to the whole word because they didn't what they want.
Again, you never answered my questions in one of my previous posts. The problem was (in the case of Podcaster and the MailWrangler app) is that Apple wasn't consistent. Before or After.
I don't give a d*mn about the agreement. Imho, this is stuff that people should know.
When the App store was formed, I knew this would happen, a developer gets rejected, they go and cry to the media and everyone says Apple are the bad guys and feels sorry for the small developer.
Do you really side with Apple 100% like it seems like right now?
Yes I would like to see this court, I'm sure Apple would win.
Sony felt the same way before they lost in the Rootkit debacle. Guess what, the rootkit stuff was IN the EULA. Guess what, Sony STILL LOST.
Like I said the world is not fair, why can't I go and sell the bread that I made in my house at the local grocery store, if they don't let me sell it there, they are being anticompetitive, what a joke.
Poor example, a better example would be:
- Hey make bread and apples and we'll sell them in our store.
You make some bread and try to sell it to the store.
- Oh, sorry, we can't allow sale of this because it's Rye bread. We don't allow rye bread b/c we sell it already.
Ok, but where's it in the NDA?
- Oh, we just added it. Sorry, it duplicates functionality already.
What a minute, but you're selling green apples, but there are 100 other green apple types being sold.
- No comment.