Girl in the picture looks like a Memoji
Which you can get on the iPhone 15.You should exit the forum mentality. People buying a 16 are maybe former iPhone 11 owners, so there are PLENTY of reasons to buy anyway. Performance, battery life, better camera, USB C…
Good point.I think Apple is going to settle early and partially refund the iPhone 16 buyers.
I was just able to replicate this.
Just noticed notification from Apple Store to buy 16 pro because ‘it’s built for Apple intelligence’. Guess technically not misrepresenting.They've attached "built for Apple Intelligence" to things that were designed and released before it was even a going concern of theirs.
It's gaslighting to make it look like this was all a grand plan, as opposed to what really happened -- getting caught with shorts off when the tide went out.
No way they are going to offer free services instead of a partial refund IMO. They are going to want to get out from under this early.Good point.
My guess is that they'll take the Apple way out and offer 'X months free' to whatever subscription service they have.
I'm not a tax attorney by any measure, but I believe a company can claim both what you and I theorize as a settlement as a tax write-off. Think it's called "an ordinary and necessary business expense."
Fines or penalties aren't deductible however, at least not to my knowledge.
We'll have to see what happens.No way they are going to offer free services instead of a partial refund IMO. They are going to want to get out from under this early.
Anyway, the attorneys would not even accept that offer.
Their gaslighting is part of their new net zero emissions strategy.It's gaslighting to make it look like this was all a grand plan, as opposed to what really happened -- getting caught with shorts off when the tide went out.
If the wife was relying on Siri to remind her of the husbands birthday...Instead now we get:
Wife botched husbands birthday ... totally forgot ... but she's saved by quickly getting him a "gift" of her iPhone making a photo slideshow
So much love
So heartwarming
/s
That was one of the worst ADs I've ever seen. The fact that it made it past concept stage, all the way to production and release shows that something is SERIOUSLY wrong inside Apple.
Who purchased those phones for those features? No one, that's who. This won't of no whereId be pissed too if I purchased a new iPhone to get those features
There's the Gemini app for iOS but as you know, Apple has system integration locked down to Siri, which everyone else knows, is pure garbage.is there any possibility to use gemini system wide in iOS?
Kind of agree.
Apple has been accused of false advertising and unfair competition for delaying the Siri Apple Intelligence features that it promoted when launching iOS 18 and the iPhone 16 models, reports Axios.
![]()
The suit targets Apple ads that showed off Siri features that were unavailable, and claims that Apple cultivated "a clear and reasonable consumer expectation that these transformative features would be available upon the iPhone's release," while also driving "unprecedented excitement" that convinced millions consumers to upgrade their devices when the upgrades were not necessary.
After confirming that the Siri features would be delayed until the coming year, Apple removed the ads, but that was after they had been running for several months. Apple is accused of advertising functionality that did not exist, and continuing to promote the Siri capabilities well after the company was aware that they would not be available on time.
The lawsuit was filed in a San Jose, California court and the plaintiffs are seeking class action status along with damages for customers who purchased an Apple device that supports Apple Intelligence.
Article Link: Apple Facing False Advertising Lawsuit Over Apple Intelligence Delay
Who purchased those phones for those features? No one, that's who. This won't of no where
No need to argue about it, but I’m sure there are plenty of people there who don’t even use their services. Makes no sense.We'll have to see what happens.
Opposing counsel can reject the settlement of free services under the argument that said settlement doesn't fully address the harm(s) caused by the misrepresentation, however that burden of proof is then upon opposing counsel to effectively argue.
Feel free to exclude yourself from the class action if it comes to that.Who purchased those phones for those features? No one, that's who. This won't of no where
🙃It’s good to see the lawsuit, but sadly the US consumer protections are simply not up to snuff to have something like this go in favour of the consumer.
Stupid of Apple to put a feature that wasn’t anywhere close to shipping in an ad that ran during NFL football games. Who the heck approved that?
People are ridiculous defending Apple for this. The point of the whole topic is that Apple pushed the hell out of AI as THE SELLING POINT of the iPhone 16 series (along with almost every product this cycle). It now appears to be almost certain that these features will not arrive until the iPhone 17 series (and probably post-launch). It could have been any other feature. It just happened that they false advertised AI to drive sales. Mentioning it at WWDC is one thing. Putting it in EVERY SINGLE ad for your products as the tag line is another.
Enough with the individualistic overkill, where people want to blame individuals for being deceived. Oh, someone robbed you? That’s your fault for being an idiot and not protecting yourself. Should have known there are thieves out there. /s
What’s the point in getting an inferior phone ? iPhone 16 is a better product, even without AI.Which you can get on the iPhone 15.
Count me in. I want a full refund in fact.
Apple has been accused of false advertising and unfair competition for delaying the Siri Apple Intelligence features that it promoted when launching iOS 18 and the iPhone 16 models, reports Axios.
![]()
The suit targets Apple ads that showed off Siri features that were unavailable, and claims that Apple cultivated "a clear and reasonable consumer expectation that these transformative features would be available upon the iPhone's release," while also driving "unprecedented excitement" that convinced millions consumers to upgrade their devices when the upgrades were not necessary.
After confirming that the Siri features would be delayed until the coming year, Apple removed the ads, but that was after they had been running for several months. Apple is accused of advertising functionality that did not exist, and continuing to promote the Siri capabilities well after the company was aware that they would not be available on time.
The lawsuit was filed in a San Jose, California court and the plaintiffs are seeking class action status along with damages for customers who purchased an Apple device that supports Apple Intelligence.
Article Link: Apple Facing False Advertising Lawsuit Over Apple Intelligence Delay