Odd, in these parts an iPhone costs
exactly the same as a comparable Android model.
See iPod touch and iPad for equally competitive pricing.
The tired old "Apple makes overpriced toys" chestnut just doesn't work in the mobile device world.
Really, now?
iPhone 3GS = £420
HTC Desire = £380
iPhone 3GS specs = 800MHz processor underclocked to 600MHz, 256MB RAM.
HTC Desire specs = 1GHz Snapdragon, 576MB RAM
Huh. Well, let's look at the latest offerings from both companies.
iPhone 4 = £500 (16GB model)
HTC Desire HD = £470
iPhone 4 specs = underclocked 1GHz A4 (it runs at 800MHz, right?), 512MB RAM
HTC Desire HD specs = latest generation 1GHz Snapdragon, 768MB RAM
Who gives you a better deal?
"Choice" as in fewer available apps and lower quality apps? Good for them. There are pros and cons with every choice. I find the available of apps and higher quality of the iOS platform to be a superior "choice" then the ability to apply themes to my mobile OS and easily obtain pirated software. To each his own.
The quality of the apps is fine, who's the one falling for myths now?
As for the pirated apps thing... You act like it's actually a challenge to crack iOS apps.
I think you just described Android perfectly. They get the iPhone substitute their carrier provides, or they get those freebie deals. "Buy a decent Android phone, get this crappy Android phone FREE!"
Or maybe they don't want to pay stupidly high prices for a bloody phone? The prices for iPhones increase every single year. They'll be running at £1,000 soon.
The Android astroturfing around here (and everywhere else on the Web - "ANDROID FTW! ZOMG!!!!") grows tiresome.
Same can be said of the iPhone fanboys, my friend.