I remember that in the aricle he lists the pro's extensivly, but not the cons like increases app size more memory usage, apps not adapted,...
Same as he goes on how apple dominated the market for years or had an head start for years (or something like that) or that how the GPU is always far superior because the others are incapable,...
But no matter what I say you wont accept it and he will be the perfect reviewer, and for apple he is .
No, it isn't BS, it's all factual.
http://www.androidauthority.com/apple-samsung-ad-budget-2013-366238/
"As for the actual figures, Samsung splashed about $363 million on US phone ads, down 10 percent from 2012s cost of $401 million. Samsung was also the only smartphone company to cut its advertising budget last year. Apple, on the other hand, spent around $351 million on phone advertising in 2013, up 5 percent from $333 million in the previous year. As a side note, Apple spent more on TV ads in 2013 than it spent on all advertising in 2012."
If you have other numbers do give them on samsung and apple smartphone ad spending do give them.
Sure thats why I have samsung and apple devices .
http://www.asymco.com/2012/11/29/the-cost-of-selling-galaxies/
Obviously you realize that you only focussed on a single segment of a single country, right?
About the rest, stating the obvious (apple devices have superior CPU and GPU performance on ON SCREEN tasks) and saying that the benefits far outweight the negatives about 64 bit are only the truth. What is your problem?
Yes, you are biased and samsung sells inferior products.