This is just stupid. Why must lawyers continue to do shady nonsense. Every time I tell people I'm in law school they think I'm 'scum' and going to do this type of nonsense.
I would never take a case like this!
why not? it's lucrative stuff
This is just stupid. Why must lawyers continue to do shady nonsense. Every time I tell people I'm in law school they think I'm 'scum' and going to do this type of nonsense.
I would never take a case like this!
I've got a conscience and would prefer to be able to sleep at night!why not? it's lucrative stuff
I can understand the reasoning. These people are paying a fairly heavy premium for yearly access to the latest model. A simple solution for the future. Would be for Apple to open up ordering to premium members a day or two before it opens to everyone else. But limit early orders to the number of phones they currently have the requisite 12 payments on.
Ambulance chasing bastards didn't even pretend to give an opportunity to cure the (supposed) tort.
.. either apple breached contract or some people signed up for something and they weren't fully aware of what they were signing up for.. (which, i suppose, could add complications to the case as it could then be argued the ads were misleading)
do you think it's only americans who are involved in this lawsuit?Only in America![]()
Yes.
Sound ridiculous: yes.
Valid financial argument: yes.
I pretty much disagree with all the comments disregarding this lawsuit.
Sure it might seem petty but they should have been allowed to pre-order just like everyone else for pick up in store. Being forced to only pick from apple store stock is 'restricted access'. I hate lawyers but apples policy is a wrong one, you can't just ask for the change it won't happen.
Btw i dont understand the need to upgrade every year, this is the most mental part. Apple should have know they'd collected the crazy then created a storm.
We went from "this is the worst iPhone ever" and "nobody wants this iPhone" and from "Apple is doomed" or "Apple can keep it's iphone without a jack" to If I don't have it now I am sueing.....
Wow talk about being coherent.
Yes and no. If you signed up purely to get your upgrade after 12 payments, but in fact you end up paying 13 to get the same upgrade that's not really OK is it?
Give it a chance! What a heck is wrong with people? If they don't get the phone on the very first day the world comes to an end?? Geeezzz!!
In law school. But if you read all my previous posts I am totally against this lawsuit. Most ridiculous thing I've heard in a while.
Pathetic - ask them to do a monthly regular payment to "Water Aid".
http://www.wateraid.org/uk
View attachment 650804
say what?
no she didn't.
This is a moronic first world problem, just pure disgusting greed on the part of skumbag Lawyers looking for any stupid reason to sue and make money - and i'm in the iUP program. All these frivolous lawsuits cause so much more damage than the alleged "problems" they fix. Our insurance rates are going thru the roof because of these stupid lawsuits. Not getting an iphone on launch day is not an issue that harms anyone and I'm sure Apple will make good on any payments made in errs. The judge that allows this case to go thru needs to be put out to pasture and replaced. My life will somehow continue if I don't get the phone this friday . And guess what - COFFEE IS FREAKING HOT!!!!!
Have you made
have you made 12 payments. The first 12 months won't be up until at least the 23rd or the 26th of September. Did you ready terms of the program? Eligible to upgrade after 12 months....
And soon in UK and China as they are getting this program this year ... this will happen if they continue the same practice.Only in America![]()