Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
People download illegal products for a multitude of reasons - trying to weed it down to a single reason is silly. The fact that they're free is certainly a big part of it, but you'd be remiss in claiming that the increasingly stronger chokehold that content producers are exercising on their customers through DRM has nothing to do with it. For me, at least, the scenario of buying content to support the studio (if its something I'm buying I'm going to want them to make more of it, after all) and then downloading or somehow producing a copy of it with the DRM stripped is much more likely than simply living with the DRM.

Oh, and I could easily get all the music I want for free off of <name-your-sharing-method-here>, but the $.99 songs off the iTunes store are priced low enough where I'd rather buy my music and support the artists than just download it for free. Your claim kind of falls apart there - given good products at reasonable prices that don't ridiculously restrict your usage of the product after you've already bought it, people WILL pay for media.
It may not be the only reason why people are downloading stuff for free, but it sure is the number 1 reason, why pay when you can get something for free.
 
This is why people download illegally movies, CDs and software.
Correct.

It's interesting to see the reaction of people here. I guess the people that defend every single action Apple takes haven't had their coffee yet. (please take this and run with it)

The DRM-free store was not a gift; it was a must, and at a higher price. This didn't help the cause.
 
Let me get this straight....

In past threads leading up to the release of the new MB and MBP line, there were many people crying out for HDMI.

Folks, HDCP is a requirement (i.e. non optional) part of HDMI. For all of you who wanted HDMI and were mad about DisplayPort, guess what? Both are bad with respect to HDCP. DVI does not require HDCP (although it can use it).

Is this really a surprise to anyone? Is the lust for HiDef so great that people have forgotten that they've bought into HDCP with Blu-Ray, HDMI and DisplayPort?

:confused:
 
Somebody Hack It!

This is the worst news in consumer rights i've heard in a long time...

I bought my DisplayPort to VGA adapter just so that i could do things like this, in my own home, but now i can't? :mad:

Somebody should hack the software and get rid of it!

It's wrong to punish their responsible consumers by limiting what they can do with the products they purchase without telling them!

I might sue them, unless they drop all movie prices by $2-3:mad:
 
Really, this is just dumb stuff, DRM is a pain and should be eliminated, if I buy something, I should be able to do what I want with it, so long as that isn't giving it to a friend or selling it.

You know, there is an interesting question here. At one point when Apple started selling DRM-free music, there was a belief (which was later disproved) that the songs were tagged to show who bought them. How would you feel about that? If they nixed the DRM but tagged the copy that you bought as yours? Then, the people who would try to distribute movies illegally could be tracked, but our ability to use our content wouldn't be impacted. Anyone have any thoughts about that?
 
No the reason people download illegal mvoies, cd, and software is because they don't want to pay for it.

I don't have any figures, but that's not universally true. Pirating is so much easier and more convenient than purchasing, it's often the more favorable option. To me, iTunes Plus makes pirating music pointless.

Whatever the number is of people who both can afford to pay and choose to pirate, it's hardly big enough to bring down these companies, and as near as I can tell copy protection only makes it worse. None of these copy protection measures have prevented, or, it seems, at all deterred the availability of pirated content--and if it isn't doing that, I really don't see the point. All it does is prevent people sharing with friends. I don't believe in that. On the other hand I'm not in charge of maximizing profits at a record company or film studio.

What is this fascination with maximizing profits? I would think it would be more gratifying to one's vanity to be known as a saint, rather than a billionaire.
 
Not sure sure I like that idea. Having HDCP is not they way to go.

Yes it is, because they need to be standards compliant so they can actually support DVD and Blu Ray and whatnot correctly. Yes, it's all a joke and sucks, but they NEED to do it to avoid being the only company that can't play media.
 
A friend of mine had to buy a crappy old DVD player because his Xbox 360 refused to play movies on his 60" rear-projection TV.

Well, if he were able to switch the 360 to component it would not be an issue as component is analog and not digital.

From what I have heard HDCP only applies to digital, not analog.
 
I don't have any figures, but that's not universally true. Pirating is so much easier and more convenient than purchasing, it's often the more favorable option. To me, iTunes Plus makes pirating music pointless.

Whatever the number is of people who both can afford to pay and choose to pirate, it's hardly big enough to bring down these companies, and as near as I can tell copy protection only makes it worse. None of these copy protection measures have prevented, or, it seems, at all deterred the availability of pirated content--and if it isn't doing that, I really don't see the point. All it does is prevent people sharing with friends. I don't believe in that. On the other hand I'm not in charge of maximizing profits at a record company or film studio.

What is this fascination with maximizing profits? I would think it would be more gratifying to one's vanity to be known as a saint, rather than a billionaire.
The majority of the world doesn't use itunes, just because you use doesn't mean everyone else is. Sure there's a big market of those who are willing to pay for digital downloads. But there is an even bigger market of those who don't want to pay and get it off torrent sites, limewire, and the rest of those sites.
 
Right and mot of the songs on itunes already come with restrictions but yet more and more people keep buying.

Er yes but you can simply burn them to a CD and play them in your car - you can even rip them back into iTunes with no restrictions.

If I want to project a movie I have bought why should I not be allowed to - I believe that DRM is the biggest hurdle that is blocking the uptake of Blu-Ray disks - people want the HD but don't want the restrictions that come with it.

I have a PS3 yet have not bought a single movie on Blu-Ray - I will stick with DVD's and upscale them thanks. :mad:
 
These movies will not play on any display that does not support HDCP (most). So no watching on your TV or your apple monitor either.

To be clear then, we are only talking about the new Mac's with the mini-DVI port.

What I do wonder, how would this work with an older Apple Cinema Display. We should have people out there with that configuration.
 
Don't support it? don't buy it!

My own policy is not to support rubbish like this by simply not buying it when ever possible.

Any DRM is a business model that has to make profit or it fails, if you don't like it then don't buy in to it and make it profitable.
 
To be clear then, we are only talking about the new Mac's with the mini-DVI port.

What I do wonder, how would this work with an older Apple Cinema Display. We should have people out there with that configuration.

AppleTV, "brick" models of the Macbook, Macbook Pro, and Macbook Air 2.0 all support HDCP and thus will prevent you from watching TV Shows and Movies purchased from iTunes that have been secretly protected with HDCP (both Fairplay 2.0 and Fairplay 3.0 files and both SD and HD)
 
Well, if he were able to switch the 360 to component it would not be an issue as component is analog and not digital.

From what I have heard HDCP only applies to digital, not analog.

So you're left with a choice between having the highest quality connection for your games but not being able to see your movies, or downgrading the quality for everything (and buying and putting up with the hassle of a component switch, since I'd be willing to bet his are full).

I still say the studios are dumb-lucky he didn't just say 'screw it' and download his movies from then on. And that's not a way I would want to run my business, is all I'm saying. Divx plays fine from a USB stick.
 
The stupid part about this whole thing to me is, what is stopping people who rip content from building a hardware system with HDCP incorporated into the device? Seems like anyone could rip the components out of a computer or a monitor, or get cheap knock off chips from China. With the components available one could easily have a ripping machine.

There is no way to stop totally stop copy protection as long as the content is actually able to be viewed or listened to.

This has already been done, at least according to:

There's already devices (repeaters) That can strip the HDCP part and pass it to the display, and echo back the HDCP hand shake.


To each their own for a sense of humor. As for Hellboy 2, it did not live up what I had hoped for. Guillermo del Toro didn't do nearly as well with this film, but I still enjoyed it. Anyway, we are getting off topic.

My comment is not about saying you are wrong with your concern, but I would say to two things.

1. Apple probably didn't have a choice.

2. Apple really wants people like you to purchase the Apple TV.

Apple TV is a non-starter for me. Apple TV is not compatible with the EyeTV, so it can't play actual TV content. Apple TV doesn't have an optical drive, so it can't play DVDs. And, to top it off, Apple TV would also deny playing back of HDCP content to my projector, as it does not support an HDCP connection protocol.

As to whether or not Apple had a choice, they may not have had a choice about whether or not to implement it, not if they needed it to get BR going. But they certainly had a choice about HOW to implement it. And they could have limited the HDCP checking to BR movies...
 
LOL'ing @ the thought of a DRM-free world... DRM ain't dead, it's just evolved...


The digital electronics industry doesn't care... they chose HDCP, you'll like it, and you'll say thank you. End of story. And since you can't do anything about it, you'll just have to go out and buy new monitors and tvs. Just think of it as "contributing to the economy."
 
This bites

I am glad I did not rush out an buy one of the new laptops. This really sucks. As someone who works frequently with audio and video for a living I foresee this as being a major headache and am very disappointmented. Dropping the firewire port was bad enough especially since almost all professional audio interfaces use the firewire port - now this is a new headache to look forward too. Thanks Apple.
 
Bye Bye iTunes!

I don't like it. But then again, I don't buy any movies from iTunes... I buy them on DVD and then rip them to my computer to watch.

I am pretty upset that I spent afew hudred dollars on music from iTunes. It is such a pain in the a$s when I am buying a new computer. I have 4 macs (not counting the old iMac G4 I use only for word processing) and mistakenly started using one username when I started iTunes and now have another.

What if I decide to get a PC netbook (since apple refuses to make one)? I may do this to have a lightweight Skype device and maybe I want music on it.


I wont even consider gettign in to the iTues movie mess now. I was looking at the new mini projector coming out in December and dont want to get screwed
 
So all the people who have been venting about wanting to be able to play BluRay disks in their Macs are now realising that it's a double-edged sword? I love these forums. :D

I have no problem with this move, by the way, but won't be buying any new Apple tech until the dust settles a bit.
 
I am glad I did not rush out an buy one of the new laptops. This really sucks. As someone who works frequently with audio and video for a living I foresee this as being a major headache and am very disappointmented. Dropping the firewire port was bad enough especially since almost all professional audio interfaces use the firewire port - now this is a new headache to look forward too. Thanks Apple.

The firewire port is still there for pete sake, it's just on thej "Professional" laptops. You claim to be a professional and use professional hardware, so buy the appropriate Notebook. Cripes.
 
I don't see why people are getting mad about this. You asked for HD video output, you got it. You all been requesting for Blu-Ray, they are taking necessary steps to make this happen. Apple is just a company who is incorporating what industry standards are. They can't leave out HDCP and expect HD video or Blu-Ray movies to run like a charm.

I don't understand why Apple Fanboys are getting all pissy about this but take a look at Dell, HP, Gateway, Toshiba, Sony and many other companies who have added HDMI or Blu-ray to their machines. They all had to put in HDCP into their product. Do you hear customers from those companies complaining about this? I have yet to hear someone complain.

We are moving fast into the digital age only because people are setting higher standards to what they want. In order to get what they want there should be some form of regulation to control anything. I don't like it as much as the next person, however. The real people you should be mad at is the all of us who asked for any of this.

just my thought on this...
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.