Close but not quite. The technology is entirely inert. It's people always, yes. But the value or detriment of LLMs specifically is defined by who trains and thus controls them. That is why the investment is so high; it simultaneously creates a dependency on the service both from and end user and provider perspective and a method of controlling thought and communications used within its scope.
If you want to see this in action, ask various LLMs about the Tiananmen Square Massacre and see who they are associated with. Then ask yourself where we'll be in a decade.
That's not a bicycle for the mind. That's a tram that goes on rails laid by someone else with a monthly fee.
On a side note, looking at JP Morgan and BoA's recent analytics, it's a financial dead end anyway, as I predicted from my original financial modelling I did.
we're talking about pretty different things here.
Your concern is for the business case of it and how it can be used as a control and manipulation tool. I agree with what you write.
But that doesn't discount the fact that it's also an incredibly power tool when used in the correct way, as millions of people will attest to.