Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
How is Apple supposed to implement Apple Intelligence without giving third party AI programs the same core OS access that Apple Intelligence will have? (Chat GPT does not have that same access, it will be more akin to a wrapper that Siri will pass requests to)

That depends how deeply integrated Apple Intelligence will be with the OS, doesn't it?

The DMA doesn't specify that whole OS components have to be interchangeable with alternatives, otherwise, they would've said something about Siri already.

This feels like Apple is holding out because the EU was mean to them. Either that, or this is a more preferable excuse than "new Siri doesn't speak French"
 
But how can Apple know what "the spirit of the law" is? The EU thinks it's being clever, but there are always consequences to these things.
The EU's laws are designed to protect consumer rights, privacy, and fair competition. The "spirit of the law" is about ensuring technology benefits everyone safely and fairly. It's not about being clever; it's about setting standards that protect citizens. Adapting to these laws may have consequences, but they push companies to innovate responsibly.
 
No one in Europe seriously expected the features within the next year. The models are not trained on the different languages. However, not releasing iPhone mirroring is pretty embarrassing. Is this the way Apple intends to build political pressure? I must say, as a European customer, that's a bit weak. To be honest, I don't even think many people will notice.
 
No one in Europe seriously expected the features within the next year. The models are not trained on the different languages. However, not releasing iPhone mirroring is pretty embarrassing. Is this the way Apple intends to build political pressure? I must say, as a European customer, that's a bit weak. To be honest, I don't even think many people will notice.
You're jumping pretty far ahead from Apple not having this and not disclosing exactly why to this being a strategy to create political pressure.
 
The EU's laws are designed to protect consumer rights, privacy, and fair competition. The "spirit of the law" is about ensuring technology benefits everyone safely and fairly. It's not about being clever; it's about setting standards that protect citizens. Adapting to these laws may have consequences, but they push companies to innovate responsibly.
No, they don't. They insert unnecessary and vague laws and rules that interrupt fair competition.
 
That depends how deeply integrated Apple Intelligence will be with the OS, doesn't it?

The DMA doesn't specify that whole OS components have to be interchangeable with alternatives, otherwise, they would've said something about Siri already.

This feels like Apple is holding out because the EU was mean to them. Either that, or this is a more preferable excuse than "new Siri doesn't speak French"
It doesn’t matter, if it is a judgement call. Companies will not take a chance, the moment EU inserts itself in to the OS. Apple or any other company will not risk even if there is a hint of DMA lurking over the head. It’s enterprise risk management 101.
 
EU or China, lines are continuing to blur
Comparing the EU to China is ridiculous and shows a lack of understanding. The EU enforces regulations to protect privacy, consumer rights, and fair competition, ensuring tech companies operate ethically. China is known for its censorship and state control, which is the opposite of the EU’s commitment to democracy and individual freedoms.
 
It is the not the feature, it is access to the relevant API, so someone could also build a screen sharing app. That is called competition.
I think it’s pretty clear the DMA is about services they make money from… Unless Apple intends to charge 30% from a developer because you were mirroring your screen to a Mac or whatever (which at this point I don’t necessarily doubt)
 
Comparing the EU to China is ridiculous and shows a lack of understanding. The EU enforces regulations to protect privacy, consumer rights, and fair competition, ensuring tech companies operate ethically. China is known for its censorship and state control, which is the opposite of the EU’s commitment to democracy and individual freedoms.
I'm completely with EU in the spirit of these laws...but take away the layer of why each is doing these things and it is definitely starting to overlap.
 
  • Love
Reactions: wilhoitm
I think it’s pretty clear the DMA is about services they make money from… Unless Apple intends to charge 30% from a developer because you were mirroring your screen to a Mac or whatever (which at this point I don’t necessarily doubt)
I think it's pretty that you never read or understand the DMA, it is about market control, not making money.
 
The irony that we're talking about having Stockholm involved in telling you what you can do with your device...

You're confusing an EU member with Apple

Apple is the one trying to tell you what you can and can't do with your device

The ironic part is that you're actually proving the existence of the syndrome here
Four key components of Stockholm Syndrome -- pay attention to #1 and #4

  • A hostage's development of positive feelings towards the captor
  • No previous relationship between hostage and captor
  • A refusal by hostages to cooperate with police and other government authorities
  • A hostage's belief in the humanity of the captor, ceasing to perceive them as a threat, when the victim holds the same values as the aggressor
 
I figured this was going to happen to Apple Intelligence but iPhone Mirroring, really? 😵‍💫 I was looking forward to that
Yeah, when they initially accepted the iPad as not being a gatekeeper, then included it even though it absolutely doesn’t meet some of the requirements… there’s literally no way for Apple, in this type of mercurial environment, to be able to hit a regulatory target. And that’s just with something as simple as “is the iPad considered a gatekeeper?” Apple Intelligence is a whole ‘nother level of complexity that requires more certainty from regulators “build it, release it and we’ll tell you if we’ll fine you”.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.