MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
53,482
15,205



Apple is continuing to expand manufacturing efforts related to the production of its own chips, according to a new report today by Nikkei, which stated that the company aims to "better compete" in the artificial intelligence field and reduce reliance on major suppliers like Intel and Qualcomm. Nikkei's sources said Apple's interest lies in building "core processors for notebooks, modem chips for iPhones, and a chip that integrates touch, fingerprint and display driver functions."

Apple has reportedly "invested in research and development" for baseband modem chips -- currently sourced from Intel and Qualcomm -- which are required for cellular communication features on Apple's mobile devices. Analysts pointed towards Apple's legal fight with Qualcomm, and its poaching of Qualcomm modem chip engineer Esin Terzioglu, as examples to bolster the theory that the Cupertino company is ready to build its own modem chips.

ifixit-teardown-iphone-8.jpg
iPhone 8 teardown by iFixit


Building its own core processor chips for MacBooks would reduce Apple's dependence on Intel, with two industry sources stating that Apple would instead build its notebook chips using ARM Holding's technology, a British company that designs ARM architecture and licenses it out to other companies. Apple's interest in designing chips that integrate touch, fingerprint and display driver functions is said to be because the company "wants to control next-generation display technology and some related key components."

Multiple analysts provided theories behind Apple's move to design more of its own chips for its products, which included staying on the forefront of artificial intelligence, lowering production costs, better protecting proprietary technology, and more.
"By designing its own chips, Apple can better differentiate itself from others. Further, depending too much on other chip suppliers in the age of artificial intelligence will deter its development," said Mark Li, a Hong Kong-based analyst with Sanford C. Bernstein.

"We believe that more system houses will design their own chips. The purposes are to develop and protect their proprietary technology information, to make more efficient chips for their unique need, to lower [costs] and to do inventory control better and keep all logistic operation confidentially," Samuel Wang, a U.S.-based analyst at research company Gartner, said..
Apple has long designed and built the core processing chips found in iPhones and iPads, but this year reports began to emerge of the company's hope to expand the amount of internal iOS device components that it creates on its own. In April, Apple informed Imagination Technology that it would stop using its graphics technology over the next two years, aiming to make its own graphics processing chips and lessen its reliance on the supplier. Less official was a prediction by analyst Karsten Iltgen that Apple would drop Dialog Semiconductor from its supply chain and move to its own in-house power management chips for iPhones by 2019.

This week, Apple was part of a consortium that purchased Toshiba's much-sought-after NAND memory chip unit for $17.7 billion, another move that will eventually allow Apple to be less reliant on other suppliers for device components. Still, many of Apple's in-house chip production lines are many years off, with analyst Mark Li stating that it's "unlikely" Apple will be able to debut its own components -- specifically referring to the modem chips -- within the next two years.

Article Link: Apple Interested in Developing ARM-Based Mac Processors and iPhone Modems in House
 

MuzakaEklekta

macrumors regular
Dec 5, 2006
110
20
If this means an ARM-based Mac mini, I'll take it. ANYTHING will do, as long as it has enough horsepower to run macOS smoothly with real desktop horsepower.
 
  • Like
Reactions: femike

imran5720

macrumors regular
Dec 21, 2013
248
791
I would love a mac with 64 core arm bionic processor , and its quite possible when using ARM technology
 

tipoo

macrumors 6502
Jan 5, 2017
384
482
The Apple TV being actively cooled and already being well more powerful than the Mac Mini's CPU and GPU would be an interesting inflection point. More ports, more NAND, more RAM, and this would be an interesting place to start, and get devs to start compiling for ARM before the rest of the line moves (similar to their x86 transition, wasn't every system at once)

kgF5iYWX6bVZXBCl.huge



Question will be what becomes of Boot Camp. Though there will be ARM Windows builds too, and Microsoft was working on a binary translator in software...Perfect storm?
 

lowendlinux

macrumors 603
Sep 24, 2014
5,372
6,638
Germany
I'd be interested in an ARM powered MacBook/MBP if it can get within 20% of Intel and AMD running desktop programs.
 

BaccaBossMC

macrumors regular
Jul 8, 2016
204
728
NC, USA
No! Absolutely no ARM in a Macbook. I'm switching to a Hackintoshed Razer Blade if that happens, ARM just can't run any kind of power-heavy desktop application, and Solidworks requires a Windows environment, which I run in a VM so I only have to deal with Windows part of the time. I'm fine if its a Coprocessor, but the main has to be either x86 or, in the future, Quantum. If Apple switches to ARM, they are going to lose a large portion of their user base for the Macbook: professionals.
 

djcerla

macrumors 68020
Apr 23, 2015
2,034
9,593
Italy
They will probably start with an hybrid Mac/iOS device powered by a very fast A chip, and move up from there.

It would run initially the full iPad software catalog (so no WinRT) and as more and more developers optimize for the Mac-X, the need for Intel will reduce and Apple could be able to cut them out in 6-7 years.
 

sziehr

macrumors 6502a
Jun 11, 2009
671
488
I have said this for years and every one goes no no intel this intel that processor change this processor that. I go look apple is going to start the process of having the entire OS written in a higher level language or a modern level C so that they can combine it and all the built in libraries over to ARM. Then it is a simple re-compile for most not all applications to join the ARM OS X train. This is where apple is going. There is no reason to update the Dock or Finder ETC with a total re-write to a new language otherwise. They are moving the ball slowly and in clear view to ARM. The first mechanical cooled ARM chip is now in the ATV. They are getting ready to see how far they can push the Atv it is a low risk product with low sales currently. They can latter on push it hard and if they fail they have good understanding of thermal loads in the wild. They are going to make a MacBook A series chip. This is going to happen when is the only question I have left. They have several sub-systems left to migrate on the UI side of the house. They also need to start to get developers into the idea that the apps need to be universal again. This push will come with a new heavy push for the App Store. This why the universal binaries are handled on the back end away from the user. The arm user will not know they are using arm unless they look at the specs. This is where they want to go. So you can write it one time and have it run multi thread monster on the Mac Pro or multi thread mini on the ARM in the MacBook scales perfectly and is universal. This is where apple has pointed the ship. Intel has nothing on the road map at the sub 15 watt chip size that punches. I know now I will get the people who go but arm is not intel the benchmarks don't compare etc etc. This is going to happen. So strap in for the next decade cause it will be ARM and it will be universal binaries and it will all feel like a throw back to the early 2k.
 

thomasthegps

macrumors regular
Sep 23, 2015
220
145
France
that sounds like blatant speculation. Apple is probably not going to make a ARM macbook unless they are sure their chip is powerful enough. I wouldn't worry about people leaving apple because they use ARM chips.
 

zorinlynx

macrumors 604
May 31, 2007
6,657
11,348
Florida, USA
Arrghh, No! Not ANOTHER freaking architecture change.

Not to mention, ARM processors don't even come close to the performance of Intel. I would really hate it for Apple to gimp the performance of the Mac just to not depend on Intel anymore.

How about going dual supplier? Maybe go AMD for desktops (iMacs) and Intel for notebooks. You can keep the same architecture and performance and not be tied to one company.

It would be extremely frustrating if Apple went ARM for Macs. It would be a huge negative for the platform.
 

Hater

macrumors 6502a
Sep 20, 2017
898
883
Edinburgh, Scotland
They will probably start with an hybrid Mac/iOS device powered by a very fast A chip, and move up from there.

It would run initially the full iPad software catalog (so no WinRT) and as more and more developers optimize for the Mac-X, the need for Intel will reduce and Apple could be able to cut them out in 6-7 years.

The iPad catalogue? Why? Another device that is practically useless for doing anything productive on?
 
  • Like
Reactions: tf_dc

g.a.papavasileiou

macrumors member
Sep 29, 2017
35
31
Could there be any chance that Apple may use in future products BOTH Intel AND A chips?

I mean technically, could an A11 chip and an i5 share somehow the workload and coexist?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.