that looks nasty
Right on...and only 3x the price of a Mag or HP or Westinghouse! A bargain, eh? I think not - I am very disappointed to say the least. SUCKS!
D
that looks nasty
I keep hearing that but why nobody explains why?
This is turd and way over priced for what it is. I will not be buying this.![]()
What will us pro shooters do now that Apple appears to be removing matte screens across the line? Especially for the MacBook Pro's, it now looks like we'll no longer have the ability for true color editing on the road. Apple really needs to offer an HD-matte option for at least their 17inch MBP, if not the 15" as well. Their cinema displays should also be available in both flavors too. Thank you
~Dave
Wow, you found a way to buy a Dell 24" Ultrasharp monitor for LESS than $450 when they retail for $699 ??? Check your facts before posting.
Wow, you found a way to buy a Dell 24" Ultrasharp monitor for LESS than $450 when they retail for $699 ??? Check your facts before posting.
Glossy makes the colors look better, period.
Glass enclosure ... graphic designers and photographers will have a field day trying to calibrate that thing.
Too bad the 2408FPW doesn't have the same killer look as the 3008WFP though :/Looks nice enough, but I'm still content with the $300 I saved on my Dell 2408FPW.
Open mouth. Insert foot.
http://www.etech4sale.com/412430/dell-ultrasharp-2407wfp-black-24.html
Wow, you found a way to buy a Dell 24" Ultrasharp monitor for LESS than $450 when they retail for $699 ??? Check your facts before posting.
does anyone know the specs? in the past Apple has consistently had the some of the worst brightness and contrast ratios.
....and, uh...you need a new MacPro or Macbook...who are they kidding?
did anyone also notice that they are now charging $19 for remote controls that used to be free!!!!!
Display
24-inch (viewable) LED-backlit thin film transistor (TFT) active-matrix liquid crystal display
Supported resolutions:
1920 by 1200 pixels
1280 by 800 pixels
1024 by 640 pixels
Display colors (maximum): 16.7 million
Viewing angle: 178° horizontal; 178° vertical
Brightness (typical): 330 cd/m2
Contrast ratio (typical): 1000:1
Response time (typical): 14 ms
does anyone know the specs? in the past Apple has consistently had the some of the worst brightness and contrast ratios.
....and, uh...you need a new MacPro or Macbook...who are they kidding?
did anyone also notice that they are now charging $19 for remote controls that used to be free!!!!!
Glossy compensates for a lower quality panel.
What will us pro shooters do now that Apple appears to be removing matte screens across the line? Especially for the MacBook Pro's, it now looks like we'll no longer have the ability for true color editing on the road. Apple really needs to offer an HD-matte option for at least their 17inch MBP, if not the 15" as well. Their cinema displays should also be available in both flavors too. Thank you
~Dave
I've came to the conclusion today that Apple Doesn't Need Us Pro Users anymore. It's a business decision, now the only difference in notebooks is size of screen. NO advantage to buying a "pro" machine. No Matte finish, no easy to hook up for new monitors to our $2,700 new purchased Mac Pros. they look where can they make the most money now and go there. More Virus and Security Holes are coming soon, just as the customer service has gone down the hole over the past few months. A very sad day.
STEVE, WHAT ABOUT THE MAC MINI!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!