Form ahead of function? To an extent, certainly.
SkAlex said:
The "squeeze" activating dashboard seemed a little awkward to me...dashboard was only active while you kept squeezing.
Just give it a quick "single-squeeze"--equivalent to a single click--and it should toggle Exposé (or Dashboard). It should stay on until you "click" again.
duke49er said:
Not that I care about non-mac users...but I'm just saying, they're gonna start clicking and it's gonna start doing things that they've never seen before and they're gonna be pretty annoyed and confused.
I don't think people will be confused as you describe. If they don't understand that they can right-click, and treat it like a single-button mouse... it will work that way just fine. EVEN if it's configured for right-clicking, it won't be triggered accidentally. Press the left and get a left-click. Press the middle, or across the whole thing, and get a left click. Only if you press the right side ALONE will you get a right click, and people expecting just one button won't do that anyway.
Nonetheless, the truth people need not bother denying is this:
the design COULD be better. True of most products, isn't it?
There's no question that the benefits of this unified zero-button design are minor and superficial to most people, while the disadvantages are more obvious (especially the inability to combine buttons).
So I do think this mouse would be a better mouse with 2 completely separate clicking buttons. Better in terms of usability for a greater number of people, better for a wider range of tasks (game support), better for sales, and better for Apple's reputation.
But... how MUCH better? Not that much. The monobutton is a choice I wouldn't have made, but I doubt it's a deal-breaker for that many people. And there are SOME advantages--including the "cool" factor which does count for something.
And offsetting that one "bad choice" are some really GOOD things--especially the scroll ball... and the squeeze-trigger which you can use without affecting your click/scroll fingers at all, and without moving your other fingers away from where they normally rest... and the customizability... and the ability to set very different motions to be your main click (variety is good for your hand)... and the overall shape which is still the best mouse shape ever in my opinion.
So this may not be a perfect mouse for everyone, but then what mouse is? It's still a very GOOD mouse. (And BT is coming in the end, fear not.)
I DO like it despite the issues noted, and I'm trying to justify getting one

It would be fun and useful. But I don't feel the need to deny the flaws it DOES have. It's a personal call whether the flaws are important to each buyer or not. I think they're minor flaws for most people--once they TRY it--but they are still real and people aren't wrong to point them out.