With the Apple Watch as the buckle? You sir are a genius.If you bought enough links I wonder if you could make a belt?!
That would be the ultimate accessory!
With the Apple Watch as the buckle? You sir are a genius.If you bought enough links I wonder if you could make a belt?!
That would be the ultimate accessory!
I look forward to hearing the first success story on these forums of someone who has gone from 500 lb to a svelte 300 lb courtesy of the Apple Watch. Thinner than Thin.
How could offering an extension to a wrist bracelet that was created before the launch be a "hassle"?They already know how to shorten and extend it. Done deal before the watch ever appeared, no hassle.So much hassle for a flop product.
I know you're joking and I totally agree that watch bands cost more than they should. That said, IF the watch really was able to slim a 500 pound person down to 300, then it'd be saving them a LOT of money. They could buy extra links instead of "get slim fast" supplements; and they'd be saved the money they were spending on medical bills (a lot of heath problems if one is that overweight); they wouldn't have to buy a "breather" device to make sure they don't choke/suffocate in their sleep, or a mobility scooter; and they'd never again have to buy a second seat on a airplane. In short, if an AW can actually help someone slim down like that, then it's worth every penny, extra links included. And this person would end up with more than enough money for groceries left over.Because they won't have enough money left over for groceries.
- Apple is already manufacturing these bands; now they're just selling a smaller portion of the final product. Even if the product were a flop, this seems to be a minimal hassle money-making grab.
- Anybody who doesn't consider the Apple Watch a flop most likely wouldn't condenser the ability to expand their watchband a hassle.
Why? What do non-obese people get for free at the Apple Store?Six links for $49 is a decent price. But people with large wrists should be given extra links for free at the Apple Store.
Exactly!With the Apple Watch as the buckle? You sir are a genius.
With the Apple Watch as the buckle? You sir are a genius.
AngerDanger, has anyone ever told you you're running the risk of making far too much sense for this place?
Two words: wrist detection.With the Apple Watch as the buckle? You sir are a genius.
I'm not saying the watch is a flop, I'm sure Apple will sell lots of them and profit, but I am saying that the apple watch is definitely a clumsy ineligant kludge.
aha! That had me giggling away to myself!Now I'm just envisioning someone hopping up on a checkout counter and humping the credit terminal trying to use apple pay. My mind can't unsee that :-O
Which is why I think they should have made a 46mm watch as well. Most everyone I know, including women, chose the 42, and many wanted something larger.
Yeah... for a pimp!If you bought enough links I wonder if you could make a belt?!
That would be the ultimate accessory!
Well I'm a woman with smaller wrists. I didn't want 42 and certainly wouldn't want anything even largerthan that. I'm glad Apple is one of the few actually catering to women (or men) with small wrists.
If you bought enough links I wonder if you could make a belt?!
That would be the ultimate accessory!
or just get one of those kickstarter adapters and use your own band for significantly less.