So much hassle for a flop product.
Yes, 25-30M the first calendar year... Flop (soc).
First message and already ignored. Good going there hey!
So much hassle for a flop product.
Why? What do non-obese people get for free at the Apple Store?
Which is why I think they should have made a 46mm watch as well. Most everyone I know, including women, chose the 42, and many wanted something larger.
The Apple Watch and it's accessories are a joke. Amongst the worst products to have come out of Cupertino in recent times.
That would've been good. I mean I'm no stick insect, but I'm not chubby either - I'm built like a fairly average 20-something guy, and the 42mm is verging on the small side.
Well, it's worth whatever people are willing to pay for it.
So if people are willing to pay $200+ then that's what it's worth.
Well I'm a woman with smaller wrists. I didn't want 42 and certainly wouldn't want anything even largerthan that. I'm glad Apple is one of the few actually catering to women (or men) with small wrists.
Why? What do non-obese people get for free at the Apple Store?
Apple catering for the fatties now
I didn't know Apple used Watchdots for their promotional images!
(I think someone forgot to add that bit of the crown back in in Photoshop...)
Calm down, I was half joking. I just found it hard to believe that the crown would be perfectly white.I think you don't know what your talking about and clearly don't understand how light reflects off types of metal... unedited picture of my watch I took just now
Calm down, I was half joking. I just found it hard to believe that the crown would be perfectly white.
Bravo.You realize that someone who is 6ft4 and thin as a rail in perfect shape, yet can't fit into a large Apple Watch, yet someone who is 5ft2 and weighs 240 lbs can fit into a small band because their bones aren't thicker, they're just overweight. Maybe you should stop and think about what you say before you say it.
HAHA, quick to tell me to calm down, and quick to accuse apple of bad photoshopping... Hopefully in real life you're not so quick to jump to conclusions without first thinking through what you're saying. LOL ;-)
I can't wait for you to say that to the football players and weight lifters who are the most likely ones to be buying those extra links to fit around their big boned wrists.Apple catering for the fatties now
To my (obviously untrained...) eye, it looked unnatural.
By calm down, all I meant was you could've pointed it out without the sarcastic tone and condescending attitude. I'm perfectly happy to be corrected when I'm wrong (which, as I'm human, is pretty often).
From the pricing is it fair to deduce that Apple's $450 link band costs less than $100 to produce?
No it's not.I'm confused here. Lebron James wears a size 15 shoe. His wrist circumference is 302 mm.
LOL.Does that make him obese? You really ought to educate yourself.
But yes, the only non-obese people in tip top shape with such a wrist size are athletes at the extreme edge of the athletic spectrum. I wonder, do you complain at your favorite department stores that they don't sell 200cm belts at no extra charge, because there are sumo wrestlers in tip top shape requiring such belts? Oh why am I asking this? I am sure you do that!On the flip-side, maybe they should surcharge based on body mass index. Maybe you would reconsider your position... just cause someone is 5ft2 and overweight but since their frame is smaller they can fit into a small Apple Watch doesn't put logic to their argument that someone in tip top shape that's 6ft4 and has a large wrist is obese.
No it's not.
Yeah, something doesn't sound right about that measurement. That's just shy of 12 inches (11.89"), and would be (at least, seem like) a massive wrist on someone like LeBron (even with his height/weight).