People *will* buy however,
My aren't we the optimist.
I bet people won't buy.

People *will* buy however,
You can and they are. You can also use the 5500 on the single socket board. Quickpath shuts down links that are not fully connected. The daughter card with the CPUs and memory is quickpath connected. The X58 DP northbridge is on the main motherboard.
Also, the "Xeon 3500 series" chip that is in the single-socket machine is essentially identical to the 2.66 GHz Core i7, only with ECC added. Also, that *guarantees* that the 'quad-core' system only has one physical socket. Xeon 5500 series chips can be used in a single-socket board; but Xeon 3500 series chips cannot be used in a dual-socket board. (aka, the chips are downward compatible, but not upward compatible.)
Yup, those G5 benchmarks are appreciated. Unfortunately, not quite 2x the performance on Photoshop for the octo 2.93GHz versus the G5...as that would infer that the octo 2.26 will only be roughly a 1.5x gain.
Apple is just another company without Steve Jobs.
macrumors a place for crybabys as usual.
A lot of people are afraid of drastic change.
On the contrary, it is Job's aversion to Blu-ray (a format not easily pirated nor downloaded) that wrote the epitaph of Apple.
![]()
What the hell? What is with the entry level price point??
From what I understand:
$150 graphics card
$100 SuperDrive
$200 HDD
$373 processor
$150 memory??
=========
$973
So the logic board (again without wireless) and the case costs OVER $1500? I'm sorry, but Apple's ENTRY LEVEL PowerMacs used to be $1500, TOTAL. What ever happened to that? I know asking $1499 for the entry level is stretching it, especially in these economic times, but even $1999 would have been better then what they're asking for now.
I mean, really... people complain about the iMac prices, but this is just pathetic... I almost hope the iPhone starts getting smacked around, so Apple realizes it has to give a ***** about it's desktop market again.
I am disappointed. I would have expected a better price at those configurations.
Apple is just another company without Steve Jobs.
Massive fail. And I'm not alone in that assessment.
http://www.pcworld.com/article/160608/mac_fans_fume_about_updated_desktops.html
Apple... meet Amigaworld. It's a very pathetic place.
![]()
They are the only company selling Macs legally. So they can sell overpriced computers.
Completely difference architectures and sockets. They're Intel and x86/64 but alien to each other nonetheless.I'd assume that these new CPUs can't be added to January 2008 Mac Pros? Specifically the 3.2GHz 8-core one?
The RAM is ECC. This is cleverly hidden on the Mac Pro's Tech Specs page.Is the memory in this beast ECC, even though it is not FB-DIMM?
This is the setup for the return of Steve Jobs in June/July! I can almost taste it.
Severe drop in sales for this quarter and half of next. Jobs returns with present company still intact. He muscles a severe important meeting - stock split occurs in the interim - and BANG impressive updates like ...
MacMini $100US price drop on the top or $150 incl iTunes Store gift of $50.
iMac entry 24" gets shunned completely! 512MB GT 120 goes mid or high with BTO on low 20".
MacPro gets 2nd QuadCore on the low end, Bump HDD, cpu speed on high end with more BTO options.
all equaling better $$ purchase value to customers. "They have spoken"
All the while MB & MBP sales steady or increase.
I'd be happy with my current machine rather than play the restock game, return the RAM, and start all over again.Since we don't have any official benchmarks out yet on the Nehalem 2.26's - the only thing even NEAR what I could afford (but not really afford) I want to check my following logic.
2 weeks ago (to the day) I purchased the previous version of the MP with 2x2.8 processors on a student discount. After adding extra ramjet memory to get it up to 6 gb and going back to apple today to get the end of life rebate which was $300 back since the price dropped within the 2 weeks since I bought the machine I ended up with the following:
2x2.8 processors on previous version
6 Gb memory
256 video card (the only other difference I see from the base 2.26 nehalem model now which is at 512)
Total cost of my 2 week old previous model = $2655
So all that to say here is my question:
If I were to return this machine to apple and get the new 2x2.26 GHz machine it looks like it would cost $3611.58 to get the new model and pay the $250 restocking fee.
It seems to me that I should be happy as hell that I got my Mac Pro for $2655 (with airport and 6 Gb ram) 2 weeks ago when then performance difference between the new 2x2.26 Ghz nehalem and the 2x2.8 Ghz Harpertown I have will definitely not outweigh that $1000 difference I'd have to eat.
Just looking for confirmation on this - the new pricing seems ridiculous and I'd be much better off putting that extra $1000 I saved into getting more memory for my harpertown version or finally getting that coveted CalDigit Raid Card (http://www.CalDigit.com/RAIDCard/)
Thoughts?