I don't see this either....I see the "up to 16GB of RAM" but I don't see any choice on the webpage. Will it be exclusive to the 2TB option like 2017 pro 6GB?
I don't see this either....I see the "up to 16GB of RAM" but I don't see any choice on the webpage. Will it be exclusive to the 2TB option like 2017 pro 6GB?
Sounds more like something to announce at WWDC to give developers a head start, and announced to the public for the new iPadOS. Hopefully? Crossing my fingers.This is really tempting. I have a 2-year-old vanilla iPad that I don't use much, mainly because there isn't a lot I can do with it. But these new models look much more useful. I'm surprised they didn't announce that Mac apps could run on it. There doesn't seem to be anything preventing that now, especially with a connected keyboard and trackpad.
lol I just bought a house. I don’t want another iPadyou know you want it - go for it![]()
Apple now can officially let macOS run on the ipad...like dual boot ipadOS and madOSBOTH MODELS GETTING 16GB OF DDR4X RAM😲 only 1/2TB get 16. Other ones get 8GB
EDIT: first iOS/iPadOS product for Apple to mention how much RAM it has
Get over it, iPad wont (and shouldn’t) run macOS.
The iMac powers a bigger screen, and maybe MacOS requires more power to run?It uses the same chip as the new iMac, but they made a point in the new iMac video of showing that it still needs cooling fans. So that pretty heavily implies that the M1 in the iPad is either under-clocked relative to other devices using it, or that its performance will be bursty rather than continuous due to heat.
It goes to only 800.The iPhone goes to 1200 nits peak what are you talking about.
The new iPhone 12 and iPhone 12 Pro have on paper almost the same display characteristics, both being 6.06” OLED panels with 2532 x 1170 resolution, however they differ in their characteristics when looking at the peak maximum brightness achieved, with the regular iPhone 12 model peaking at 625 nits and the 12 Pro peaking at 800 nits.
I said most, not all. But congrats on finding one example lol. Again, nothing impressive...humble yourself
They’ve had years already. You don’t get to restart the development clock every time someone mentions running OS X on an iPad is possible.Yes, improving iPadOS is the way, though it’s difficult and will need some time.
It uses the same chip as the new iMac, but they made a point in the new iMac video of showing that it still needs cooling fans. So that pretty heavily implies that the M1 in the iPad is either under-clocked relative to other devices using it, or that its performance will be bursty rather than continuous due to heat.
Awesome to see, now they just need to allow for a dual boot option - WWDC maybe?
I think with M1 and 8-16Gb RAM, developers will be targeting the iPad Pro and Mac line simultaneously within X-Code. I doubt that there’ll be any reason to run MacOS when the Apps will have parity.From a purely commercial point of view you are obviously correct, and this is probably the line Apple will take for the foreseeable future.
From a technical point of view the new iPad Pro can run MacOS as well as any other M1 powered Mac.
iPad Pro has no heatsink and we've seen A14 throttle in the iPhone.
It's strange, but that $0.50 piece of aluminum is the main limiter of performance.
This is really tempting. I have a 2-year-old vanilla iPad that I don't use much, mainly because there isn't a lot I can do with it. But these new models look much more useful. I'm surprised they didn't announce that Mac apps could run on it. There doesn't seem to be anything preventing that now, especially with a connected keyboard and trackpad.